sex education II
PHI103.W5A1.02.2021
Description:
Total Possible Score: 20.00
Introduces Readers to the Topic and Includes a Brief Preview of What the Paper Will Accomplish
Total: 1.00Distinguished - Clearly introduces readers to the topic and includes a thorough, but brief preview of what the paper will accomplish.
Proficient - Introduces readers to the topic and includes a brief preview of what the paper will accomplish. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
Basic - Vaguely introduces readers to the topic and includes a limited preview of what the paper will accomplish. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to introduce readers to the topic and include brief preview of what the paper will accomplish; however, significant details are missing and unclear.
Non-Performance - The introduction of readers to the topic and brief preview of what the paper will accomplish are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents the Best Argument, in Standard Form, on One Side of the Issue
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Clearly presents the best argument, in standard form, on one side of the issue.
Proficient - Presents a good argument, in standard form, on one side of the issue. The argument is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Presents an argument, in standard form, on one side of the issue. The argument is underdeveloped or there are errors in the use of standard form.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present an argument, in standard form, on one side of the issue; however, the argument is significantly underdeveloped or not in standard form.
Non-Performance - The presentation of the best argument, in standard form, on one side of the issue is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents the Best Argument, in Standard Form, on the Other Side of the Issue
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Clearly presents the best argument, in standard form, on the other side of the issue.
Proficient - Presents a good argument, in standard form, on the other side of the issue. The argument is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Presents an argument, in standard form, on the other side of the issue. The argument is underdeveloped or there are errors in the use of standard form.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present an argument, in standard form, on the other side of the issue; however, the argument is significantly underdeveloped or not in standard form.
Non-Performance - The presentation of best argument, in standard form, on the other side of the issue is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates the Quality of the Two Arguments, Explains Any Fallacies, Biases, or Rhetorical Tricks Committed, and Justifies Why One is Stronger Than the Other
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Thoroughly evaluates the quality of the two arguments, comprehensively explains any fallacies, biases, or rhetorical tricks, and clearly justifies why one is stronger.
Proficient - Evaluates the quality of the two arguments, explains any fallacies, biases, or rhetorical tricks, and justifies why one is stronger. Minor details are underdeveloped or missing.
Basic - Minimally evaluates the quality of the two arguments, partially explains any fallacies, biases, or rhetorical tricks, and somewhat justifies why one is stronger. Relevant details are underdeveloped and/or missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the quality of the two arguments, explain any fallacies, biases, or rhetorical tricks, and justify why one is stronger; however, significant details are underdeveloped and missing.
Non-Performance - The evaluation of the quality of the two arguments, the explanation any fallacies, biases, or rhetorical tricks, and the justification of why one is stronger, are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents One's Own Argument, in Standard Form, on the Topic
Total: 3.00Distinguished - Clearly and accurately presents one's own argument, in standard form, on the topic.
Proficient - Presents one's own argument, in standard form, on the topic. The argument is slightly unclear or underdeveloped.
Basic - Minimally presents one's own argument, in standard form, on the topic. The argument is unclear or underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present one's own argument, in standard form, on the topic; however, the argument is not in standard form, is unclear, or has significant errors.
Non-Performance - The presentation of one's own argument, in standard form, on the topic is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents the Best Possible Objection to One's Argument
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Clearly and accurately presents the best possible objection to one's argument.
Proficient - Presents an objection to one's argument. Minor details are slightly unclear or underdeveloped.
Basic - Vaguely presents an objection to one's argument. The objection is unclear and/or underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present the best possible objection to one's argument; however, significant details are unclear and underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The best possible objection to one's argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Presents the Best Reply to the Objection to One's Argument
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Clearly and accurately presents the best reply to the objection to one's argument.
Proficient - Presents a reply to the objection to one's argument. Minor details are slightly unclear or underdeveloped.
Basic - Presents a vague reply to the objection to one's argument. Relevant details are unclear and/or underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to present the best reply to the objection to one's argument; however, significant details are unclear and underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The best reply to the objection to one's argument is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Summarizes the Evidence and Evaluates How Controversial Topics Should Be Addressed by Critical Thinkers
Total: 1.00Distinguished - Comprehensively summarizes the evidence and evaluates how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers.
Proficient - Summarizes the evidence and evaluates how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers. Minor details are slightly underdeveloped or missing.
Basic - Minimally summarizes the evidence and evaluates how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers. Relevant details are underdeveloped and/or missing.
Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize the evidence and evaluate how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers; however, significant details are underdeveloped and missing.
Non-Performance - The summary of the evidence and evaluation of how controversial topics should be addressed by critical thinkers are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 2.00Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 1.00Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 1.00Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 1.00Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Powered by