case study .1

AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018

Evaluation Criteria Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs Improvement No Credit

Content (18 points)

Complete and organized

submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions.

Submission is missing minor elements

and/or is not well- organized and/or

missed an assignment instructions.

Submission is missing minor elements

and/or is not well- organized and/or

missed an assignment instructions.

Submission is missing elements and/or is not well-organized

and/or did not adhere to assignment instructions.

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

18 13.5 9 4.5 0

Application (18 points)

High quality submissions that

clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials.

Thorough understanding and

explanation of sustainable value

chain, local sourcing, country Ethiopia,

local brewery.

Good submissions with some

connections to course materials.

Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal

experience, materials and/or comments.

Moderate explanation of

sustainable value chain, local sourcing,

country Ethiopia, local brewery.

Good submissions with some

connections to course materials.

Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal

experience, materials and/or comments.

Adequate explanation of sustainable value chain, local sourcing,

country Ethiopia, local brewery.

Little to no evidence that course materials

are understood or incorporated into submissions. Poor

explanation of sustainable value

chain, local sourcing, country Ethiopia, local

brewery.

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

18 13.5 9 4.5 0

Organization and Grammar (4 points)

Properly formatted submissions

demonstrating professional, college-

level tone, no spelling or grammar

errors and well- documented sources

(when applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper formatting or

professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar

errors or is not well- supported (when

applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper formatting or

professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar

errors or is not well- supported (when

applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper

formatting and/or professional tone

and/or may contain multiple

spelling/grammar errors and/or is not

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Spring B – 2018

well-supported (when applicable).

4 3 2 1 0