case study agriculture international business

AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Fall B – 2018

Evaluation Criteria Excellent Very Good Adequate Needs Improvement No Credit

Content (18 points)

Complete and organized

submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions.

Submission is missing minor elements

and/or is not well- organized and/or

missed an assignment instructions.

Submission is missing minor elements

and/or is not well- organized and/or

missed an assignment instructions.

Submission is missing elements and/or is not well-organized

and/or did not adhere to assignment instructions.

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

18 13.5 9 4.5 0

Application (18 points)

High quality submissions that

clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials.

Thorough explanation of source

of dispute in US-EU beef hormone case;

result or decision rendered by WTO,

knowledge of international trade, workings of WTO.

Good submissions with some

connections to course materials.

Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal

experience, materials and/or comments.

Moderate explanation of source

of dispute in US-EU beef hormone case;

result or decision rendered by WTO,

knowledge of international trade, workings of WTO.

Good submissions with some

connections to course materials.

Occasionally contributes ideas, relevant personal

experience, materials and/or comments.

Adequate explanation of source of dispute in US-EU beef hormone

case; result or decision rendered by WTO, knowledge of international trade, workings of WTO.

Little to no evidence that course materials

are understood or incorporated into submissions. Poor

explanation of source of dispute in US-EU beef hormone case;

result or decision rendered by WTO,

knowledge of international trade, workings of WTO.

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

18 13.5 9 4.5 0

AGB 302 Grading Rubric – Case Studies Spring B – 2018

Organization and Grammar (4 points)

Properly formatted submissions

demonstrating professional, college-

level tone, no spelling or grammar

errors and well- documented sources

(when applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper formatting or

professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar

errors or is not well- supported (when

applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper formatting or

professional tone or may contain minor spelling/ grammar

errors or is not well- supported (when

applicable).

Submission may be lacking proper

formatting and/or professional tone

and/or may contain multiple

spelling/grammar errors and/or is not

well-supported (when applicable).

Did not submit or submission

unacceptable.

4 3 2 1 0