Financial Management

profilejenny2000000
GradingRubric_Template.xlsx

Sheet1

Financial Management Midterm Project
0 Max
Student Name:     ________________________________________ Total Score 0 25
CATEGORY Excellent 90%-100% Good 80%-89% Satisfactory 70%-79% Deficient <70% COMMENTS Score
Key Tables, Topics and Components Included (Weight 10/25) Tables are neat and very clear and all ratios fully addressed and all questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. (9 - 10 pts) Tables are clear and most ratios are addressed and most questions answered with at least 2 sentences about each. (8 - 8.9 pts) Tables are done and some ratios are addressed, and some questions answered with 1 sentence about each. (7 - 7.9 pts) Table is not clear and/or one or more ratios were not addressed. (< 7 pts)
Logical, Relevant, In-depth, Insightful (Weight 10/25) Information is in-depth and clearly supports main topic. The information is logical, coherent, and very well-written . Student uses own insight and includes several well thought-out supporting details and/or examples. (9 - 10 pts) Information supports the main topic, with some logical and coherent info. Student uses own insight and provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples. (8 - 8.9 pts) Information relates to the main topic. Student puts little effort with no details and/or examples are given. (7 - 7.9 pts) Student puts no effort and information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. (< 7 pts)
Individual Summary Slides and Presentation (Weight 3/25) Slides are clear and covers all the key points of the assignment in-depth. Presentation points, diagrams and illustrations are all neat, accurate and add to the audience understanding of the topic. (2.7 - 3 pts) Slides are mostly clear and hits on many key ideas. Presentation points, diagrams and illustrations are accurate and add to the audience understanding of the topic. (2.4 - 2.6 pts) Slides with unclear ideas. Presentation points, diagrams and illustrations are somewhat accurate and sometimes add to the audience understanding of the topic. (2.1 - 2.3 pts) Slides displaying little or no knowledge of the material they have created. Presentation points, diagrams and illustrations are not accurate OR do not add to the audience understanding of the topic. (< 2.1 pts)
Group Presentation Points (Weight 2/25) Group and teamwork is very clear, prepared, and evident. All conclusions are logical and coherent. (1.8 - 2 pts) Group and teamwork is prepared and evident. Most conclusions are logical and coherent. (1.6 - 1.8 pts) Group and teamwork is somewhat prepared, and evident. Conclusions are somewhat logical and coherent. (1.4 - 1.6 pts) Group and teamwork is not clear, prepared, and evident. Conclusions are not logical and coherent (< 1.4 pts)