expert

Criteria Ratings Points

Comprehension 50 to >39.0 pts

Advanced

Project submission demonstrates proper analysis of all main points of the selected field activity (overview of the activity, strategic impact, and recommendations). A comprehensive analysis of the selected field activity is offered. Strongly relevant applications of the course principles are made.

39 to >29.0 pts

Proficient

Project submission demonstrates proper analysis of most main points of the selected field activity (overview of the activity, strategic impact, and recommendations). A basic analysis of the selected field activity is offered. Generally, relevant applications of the course principles are made.

29 to >0.0 pts

Developing

An incomplete analysis of the selected field activity (overview of the activity, strategic impact, and recommendations) is offered and application of the course principles is not appropriate or relevant to the content of the project.

0 pts

Not Present

Project submission does not demonstrate proper analysis of the main points of the selected field activity.

50 pts

Research Support

25 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

The paper uses 15 scholarly sources, plus the course text. Biblical integration is included and fully supports the analysis of key concepts throughout the paper.

17 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

The paper uses 13-14 scholarly sources, plus the text. Biblical integration is included but does not fully support key concepts.

10 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The paper uses less than 8-12 scholarly sources, and/or the course text is missing. Biblical integration does not support key concepts.

0 pts

Not Present

The paper uses less than 8 scholarly sources, and/or the course text is missing. Biblical integration is missing.

25 pts

Organization of Content

23 to >14.0 pts

Advanced

The organization of the content is clear and easy to follow. The layout is logical and maintains the flow of thought throughout the paper. The presentation of content is logical and flows from 1 point to the next.

14 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

The organization of the content is mostly clear and easy to follow. Content shows basic connectivity and flow. The presentation of content progresses logically.

10 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The organization of the content detracts from the message. The content is disjointed and lacks implied transition of thoughts.

0 pts

Not Present

The organization of the content is not clear and is difficult to follow. There is no connectivity or flow.

23 pts

Field Activity: Completed Activity - Overview, Research Support, Analysis, Recommendations Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230

Criteria Ratings Points

Current APA Formatting

22 to >14.0 pts

Advanced

The paper is accurately formatted in current APA format. The abstract is included and is in current APA formatting. References are cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. The evidence is properly cited with 0–2 errors and supports the main points.

14 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

The paper is formatted in current APA format with 3-4 errors. The abstract is included and contains 1-2 APA formatting errors. References are cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. The evidence is properly cited with 3–4 errors and supports the main points.

10 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The paper formatting contains more than 5-6 APA errors. The abstract is not included or contains more than 2 APA formatting errors. References are not cited using current APA style and formatting guidelines. The evidence is not properly cited and does not support the main points.

0 pts

Not Present

The paper (including abstract and reference page) is not formatted in APA or contains more than 7 errors.

22 pts

Page Count 20 to >14.0 pts

Advanced

The paper contains 15-20 pages of content.

14 to >10.0 pts

Proficient

The paper contains 13-14 pages of content.

10 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The paper contains 8-12 pages of content.

0 pts

Not Present

The paper contains less than 8 pages of content.

20 pts

Total Points: 140

Field Activity: Completed Activity - Overview, Research Support, Analysis, Recommendations Grading Rubric | BUSI691_B01_202230