Decision Making/Business Management Project Due In 3 Days, 9am EST.

Criteria Excellent Good Developing Needs Improvement

Failing

Quiz Comparison: Evaluate the Changes

2 points

Identifies all the

changes in the scores

and uses the questions

to explain why they

have occurred. The

discussion is insightful

and covers all changes

(1.80 - 2.0)

1.695 points

Identifies most of the changes

in the scores and uses

the questions to explain why

they have occurred. The

discussion of the reason for the

changes needs more

development of 1-2 of the

conclusions made.

(1.60- 1.79)

1.495 points

Identifies most

of the changes in the

scores and uses

the questions

to explain why they

have occurred. The

discussion of the

reason for the

changes needs more

development of 3 or

more of the

conclusions made.

(1.4- 1.59)

1.295 points

Attempts to

identify score

changes but

minimal

reference to

the questions is

made and/or the

explanation as to

why change may

have occurred is

minimal.

(1.2-1.39)

0 points

Little to no

attempt at

identifying

changes is

made and

or No

discussion as

to why the

changes has

been made.

No Quiz

changes were

discussed

(0- 1.19) Explanation of how the questions reflect the skills needed in making decisions

2 points

Discussion insightfully

explains how the

questions used in the

quiz reflect the skills

needed to make

decisions

well. Conclusions were

drawn from the

questions

themselves and

1.695 points

Discussion explains how the

questions used in the quiz

reflect the skills needed to make

decisions well. However, while

most conclusions were drawn

from the questions, 1-2 were

not supported with the

questions and or class material.

(1.60 - 1.79)

1.495 points

Discussion explains

generally how the

questions used in

the quiz reflect the

skills needed to

make decisions

well. However,

while most

conclusions

were drawn from

1.295 points

Attempted

discussion of

how the

questions used in

the quiz reflect

the skills needed

to make

decisions. Howe

ver, few

conclusions

0 points

Discussion

was implied

but not

supported or

clear to the

reader; No

attempt was

made to

discuss the

questions and

supported from class

material.

(1.8 - 2.0)

the questions, more

than three were not

supported with the

questions and

or class material.

(1.4 -1.59)

were drawn and

those that

were had little to

no support

from the

questions and

or class material

(1.2 - 1.39)

their

relationship

to good

decision

making.

(0- 1.19)

Identification of areas of improvement supported and explain by the quiz questions and class material

2 points

Identification of the

areas of skill

improvement that are

suggested by the quiz

was insightfully and

completely discussed.

Conclusions were

supported by the use of

the questions and the

class material.

(1.8 - 2.0)

1.695 points

Identification of the areas of

skill improvement that are

suggested by the quiz

was discussed well. Most

conclusions were supported

by the use of the questions and

the class material with the

exception of 1 or 2.

(1.60 -1.79)

1.495 points

Identification of the

areas of skill

improvement that

are suggested by the

quiz were discussed

generally. Most

conclusions were

supported by the use

of the questions and

the class material

with the exception

of 3.

(1.40 -1.59)

1.295 points

Attempt is made

to discuss

the personal

skill

improvement that

the quiz

suggested but

the conclusions

were not

supported by the

class material

from the question

s from the quiz.

(1.20 - 1.39)

0 points

Little to no

attempt was

made to

identify and

discuss class

themes in

relationship

to skill

improvement.

(0- 1.19)

E Decision Fit Plan 10 points

Identification of the

skills needed for

improvement and 4 or

8.5 points

Identification of the skills

needed for improvement and 3

specific ways to accomplish

7.5 points

Identification of the

skills needed for

improvement and 3

6.5 points

An attempt was

made to identify

skills needed for

0 points

No attempt

was made to

develop a

more specific ways to

accomplish effective

improvement are made.

Discussion reflects an

insightful and

proficient

comprehension of the

skills and tools needed

to make decisions well.

It was done through a

thorough use of class

material to support the

reasoning and

justification for the

conclusions made.

(9.0 - 10.0)

effective improvement are

made. Discussion reflects a

proficient comprehension of the

skills and tools needed to make

decisions well. Conclusions

drawn mostly used class

material to support the

reasoning and justification for

the conclusions made. 1 to

2 suggestions were weakly

developed.

(8.0 - 8.99)

specific ways to

accomplish effective

improvement are

made. Discussion

reflects a general

comprehension of

the skills and tools

needed to make

decisions

well. Suggestions

drawn mostly used

class material to

support the

reasoning and

justification as a

result they were

underdeveloped.

(7.0 - 7.99)

improvement.

Discussion was

minimally

supported with

class material

and

conclusions/sugg

estions were

based mostly on

opinion.

(6.0 - 6.99)

decision fit

plan or the

discussion

was opinion

and not

supported by

specific skills

to improve or

ways to

improve the

skills.

(0- 5.99)

Attention to Instructions

2 points

The assignment

contains completion

of all major assignment

tasks. The assessment

also includes

completion of all minor

aspects of the

assignment such as use

of page/paragraph

number, third person

writing, required use of

1.695 points

The paper contains completion

of all major assignment

tasks. missed one minor aspect

of the assignment such as use of

page/paragraph number, third

person writing, required use of

course readings, outside sources

if needed, and assignment

format

(1.60 - 1.79)

1.495 points

The paper missed

one major

assignment task

or two minor

aspects of the

assignment.

(1.40- 1.59)

1.295 points

The paper missed

two major

assignment, one

major assignment

task & one

minor tasks, or

three or more

minor aspects of

the assignments.

(1.20 - 1.39)

0 points

The

presentation

missed three

or more

major

assignment

tasks.

(0- 1.19)

course readings,

outside sources if

needed, and assignment

format.

(1.8 - 2.0) Writing Mechanics 1 point

Strictly adheres to

standard usage rules of

written English using

paragraphs and

sentence rather than

bullets, including but

not limited to

capitalization,

punctuation, run-on

sentences, missing or

extra words, stylistic

errors, spelling and

grammatical errors. No

contractions or jargon

used. Zero to two

errors noted.

(.90 - 1.00)

0.85 points

Excellently adheres to standard

usage of mechanics:

conventions of written English,

including capitalization,

punctuation, and spelling. Three

to six errors noted.

(.80 - .89)

0.75 points

Satisfactorily

adheres to standard

usage rules of

mechanics:

conventions of

English, including

capitalization,

punctuation, and

spelling. Seven to

ten errors noted.

(.70- .79)

0.65 points

Minimally adheres to

standard usage rules of

mechanics: conventions of

written English, including

capitalization, punctuation,

and spelling. More than 10

errors found.

(.6 - .69)

0 points

Does not

adhere to

standard

usage rules of

mechanics:

conventions

of written

English; does

not make

sense, or

errors are too

plentiful.

(0- .59)

APA Style (6th ed.) 1.25 points

One to two APA style

or usage errors; Proper

citation of source

1.0625 points

Attempts in-text citations and

reference list but 3 - 4 APA

style errors noted or fails to use

0.8125 points

Attempts in-text

citations and

reference lists; Fails

0.8125 points

Attempts in-text

citations and

reference lists;

0 points

No attempt at

APA style; or

attempts

material is used

throughout paper;

Reference titles follow

APA with only the first

word, the first word

after a colon and proper

nouns capitalized.

(1.125 - 1.25)

APA citations when appropriate

1-2 times.

(1.0 - 1.124)

to use APA citations

when appropriate -

5-6 times or

presents only 1-2

in-text citations and

a reference list in a

paper when APA

citations are needed

throughout the

document.

(.75 - .874)

Fails to use APA

citations when

appropriate - 5-

6 times or

presents only 1-2

in-text citations

and a reference

list in a paper

when APA

citations are

needed

throughout the

document.

(.75 - .874)

either in-text

citations or

reference list

but omits the

other.

( 0- .749)

Overall Score Excellent 18 or more

Good 16 or more

Developing 14 or more

Needs Improvement 12 or more

Failing 0 or more