Learning Plan

Criteria Ratings Points

Introductory Paragraph, Technology Integration Matrix, the ASSURE Model for Instructional Design Introduction

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

In an introduction paragraph, the candidate provides a rich and detailed overview of what technology is and what it looks like in classrooms, a minimum of two scholarly articles being used as support. The candidate provides a paragraph that solidly describes the meaningful learning environment and level of integration he/she selected for the technology integration model. The level of integration chosen is either Infusion or Transformation. The candidate sufficiently provides a brief introduction to the ASSURE model, using scholarly resources for support.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

In an introduction paragraph, the candidate provides a generally detailed overview of what technology is and what it looks like in classrooms, two scholarly articles being used as support. The candidate provides a paragraph that generally describes the meaningful learning environment and level of integration he/she selected for the technology integration model. The level of integration chosen is either Infusion or Transformation. The candidate generally provides a brief introduction to the ASSURE model, using scholarly resources for support.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

In an introduction paragraph, the candidate provides overview that is lacking in detail regarding what technology is and what it looks like in classrooms, potentially less than two scholarly articles being used as support. The candidate provides a paragraph that poorly describes the meaningful learning environment and/or level of integration he/she selected for the technology integration model. The level of integration chosen may not be either Infusion or Transformation. The candidate insufficiently provides a brief introduction to the ASSURE model, potentially not using scholarly resources for support.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

10 pts

Learner Analysis

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

The candidate provides a sufficient paragraph that fully describes his/her learners and their learning styles, prior knowledge, skill level, attitudes towards learning, comfort level, experience with technology, and other relevant characteristics.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

The candidate provides a generally adequate paragraph that mostly describes his/her learners and their learning styles, prior knowledge, skill level, attitudes towards learning, comfort level, experience with technology, and other relevant characteristics.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate provides an inadequate paragraph that minimally describes his/her learners and their learning styles, prior knowledge, skill level, attitudes towards learning, comfort level, experience with technology, and other relevant characteristics.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

5 pts

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520

Criteria Ratings Points

Technology Analysis

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

The candidate provides a sufficient paragraph that fully describes the available technology in the local setting and how it will be leveraged to maximize learning potential. The candidate includes Internet access, tools and software.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

The candidate provides a generally adequate paragraph that mostly describes the available technology in the local setting and how it will be leveraged to maximize learning potential. The candidate includes Internet access, tools and software.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate provides an inadequate paragraph that minimally describes the available technology in the local setting and how it will be leveraged to maximize learning potential. The candidate may exclude Internet access, tools, and/or software.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

5 pts

Standards and Objectives

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

The candidate begins the section with a robust introductory statement on the curriculum standards and ISTE standard(s) he/she is using for the lesson. All of the following areas have been sufficiently addressed: 1-2 state or Common Core curriculum standards are listed; at least one ISTE standard is listed; the candidate identifies 2-3 specific and measurable learning objectives associated with the selected standards.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

Adjust to "The candidate begins the section with a somewhat strong introductory statement on the curriculum standards and ISTE standard(s) he/she is using for the lesson. All but one of the following areas have been sufficiently addressed: 1-2 state or Common Core curriculum standards are listed; at least one ISTE standard is listed; the candidate identifies 2-3 specific and measurable learning objectives associated with the selected standards.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate begins the section with an introductory statement on the curriculum standards and ISTE standard(s) he/she is using for the lesson that lacks strength. 2 or more of the following areas have not been sufficiently addressed: 1-2 state or Common Core curriculum standards are listed; at least one ISTE standard is listed; the candidate identifies 2-3 specific and measurable learning objectives associated with the selected standards.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

5 pts

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520

Criteria Ratings Points

Selection of Strategies, Technology, Media, and Materials

15 to >13 pts

Advanced

The candidate begins with a paragraph (or more) that sufficiently identifies the strategies and methods for instructions and meaningful engagement at the Infusion or Transformation levels of integration, carefully outlining vibrant ways to promote learner success. The candidate discusses in full detail the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson. In another paragraph (or more), the candidate sufficiently discusses the Extended Descriptors the Technology Integration Matrix lists for his/her selection of learning environment and level of integration.

13 to >12 pts

Proficient

The candidate begins with a paragraph that generally identifies the strategies and methods for instructions and meaningful engagement at the Infusion or Transformation levels of integration, generally outlining vibrant ways to promote learner success. The candidate discusses in some detail the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson. In another paragraph, the candidate somewhat adequately discusses the Extended Descriptors the Technology Integration Matrix lists for his/her selection of learning environment and level of integration.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate begins with a paragraph that minimally identifies the strategies and methods for instructions and meaningful engagement at the Infusion or Transformation levels of integration, minimally outlining vibrant ways to promote learner success (or the strategies listed are largely limited to lower levels of integration). The candidate discusses in some detail the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson. The candidate does not discuss in much detail the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson. In another paragraph, the candidate insufficiently discusses the Extended Descriptors the Technology Integration Matrix lists for his/her selection of learning environment and level of integration.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

15 pts

Utilization of Materials

15 to >13 pts

Advanced

The candidate carefully identifies the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson and sufficiently describes how they will be used. The section reads like a detailed step-by-step guide so that someone else could easily implement the instructional plan.

13 to >12 pts

Proficient

The candidate generally identifies the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson and somewhat adequately describes how they will be used. The section reads like a general step-by-step guide so that someone else could implement the instructional plan.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate minimally identifies the technology, media, and materials he/she will use in the lesson and insufficiently describes how they will be used. The section may not read like a detailed step-by-step guide so that someone else could easily implement the instructional plan.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

15 pts

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520

Criteria Ratings Points

Requiring Learner Participation

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

In one paragraph (or more), the candidate sufficiently plans the learner's actions, describing how the learners will engage with the lesson and engage with the ideas and technology to meet learning goals and objectives. The candidate sufficient lists all formative questions he/she will use that specifically address the standards and learning objectives.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

In one paragraph, the candidate somewhat adequately plans the learner's actions, generally describing how the learners will engage with the lesson and engage with the ideas and technology to meet learning goals and objectives. The candidate somewhat adequately lists the formative questions he/she will use that specifically address the standards and learning objectives.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

In one paragraph, the candidate minimally plans the learner's actions, minimally describing how the learners will engage with the lesson and engage with the ideas and technology to meet learning goals and objectives. The candidate minimally lists the formative questions he/she will use that specifically address the standards and learning objectives.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

10 pts

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520

Criteria Ratings Points

Evaluation and Revision

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

In one paragraph (or more), the candidate sufficiently details the data collection methods he/she will use to assess the learning and sufficiently describes how the resulting data might be used to revise the instruction plan for next time. In one paragraph (or more), the candidate sufficiently describes his/her plan for evaluating the technology's effectiveness. In one paragraph (or more), the candidate sufficiently evaluates and scores the lesson he/she planned using the Triple E Evaluation Rubric and sufficiently discusses his/her findings.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

In one paragraph, the candidate somewhat adequately details the data collection methods he/she will use to assess the learning and somewhat adequately describes how the resulting data might be used to revise the instruction plan for next time. In one paragraph, the candidate somewhat adequately describes his/her plan for evaluating the technology's effectiveness. In one paragraph, the candidate somewhat adequately evaluates and scores the lesson he/she planned using the Triple E Evaluation Rubric and somewhat adequately discusses his/her findings.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

In one paragraph, the candidate minimally details the data collection methods he/she will use to assess the learning and minimally describes how the resulting data might be used to revise the instruction plan for next time. In one paragraph, the candidate minimally describes his/her plan for evaluating the technology's effectiveness. In one paragraph, the candidate minimally evaluates and scores the lesson he/she planned using the Triple E Evaluation Rubric and minimally discusses his/her findings.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

5 pts

Organization and Mechanics

15 to >13 pts

Advanced

The candidate's paper displays strong writing practices and logical organization of content. The instructional plan is relatively free of grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.

13 to >12 pts

Proficient

The candidate's paper displays generally good writing practices and generally logical organization of content. The instructional plan is somewhat free of grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate's paper may display poor writing practices and/or illogical organization of content. The instructional plan may include many distracting errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

15 pts

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520

Criteria Ratings Points

Length and Terminology

5 to >4 pts

Advanced

The paper is a minimum of 8 pages in length. The lesson plan is designed for a single 50-60 minute instructional session. The candidate's paper sufficiently demonstrates appropriate use of key terminology from the field of educational technology.

4 to >3 pts

Proficient

The paper may miss the minimum of 8 pages by a small margin. The lesson plan is designed for a single 50-60 minute instructional session. The candidate's paper generally demonstrates appropriate use of key terminology from the field of educational technology.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

The paper may miss the minimum of 8 pages by a large margin. The lesson plan may be designed for a single instructional session that is not 50-60 minutes long. The candidate's paper minimally demonstrates appropriate use of key terminology from the field of educational technology.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

5 pts

References and Current APA Format

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

The candidate includes a minimum of 3 scholarly references in addition to primary sources for TIM, ISTE, and ASSURE. The citations and references are in current APA format. All sources in the references page match the sources in the in-text citations and vice versa. The paper is sufficiently formatted according to current APA standards.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

The candidate may be missing 1 reference and may be missing a primary source for TIM, ISTE, or ASSURE. The citations and references are generally in current APA format. One or two sources in the references page may not match the sources in the in-text citations or vice versa. The paper is generally formatted according to current APA standards.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

The candidate may be missing 2 or more references and may be missing multiple primary sources for TIM, ISTE, or ASSURE. The citations and references are minimally in current APA format. Three or more sources in the references page may not match the sources in the in-text citations or vice versa. The paper is minimally formatted according to current APA standards.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Technology Integration Learning Plan Grading Rubric | EDUC730_C01_202520