FINAL PAPER - Creating an Organizational Development Proposal

profileCollegestudentM
GradingRubric.html

BUS370.W5A1.04.2021

Description:

Total Possible Score: 19.00

Section One: Summarizes the Week 3 Assignment Change Problem Case Study and Justifies Why the Problem in the Case Study Is a Problem and the Type of Problem

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly summarizes the Week 3 assignment change problem case study and comprehensively justifies why the problem in the case study is a problem and the type of problem.

Proficient - Summarizes the Week 3 assignment change problem case study and justifies why the problem in the case study is a problem and the type of problem. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially summarizes the Week 3 assignment change problem case study and minimally justifies why the problem in the case study is a problem and the type of problem. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize the Week 3 assignment change problem case study and justify why the problem in the case study is a problem and the type of problem; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The summary of the Week 3 assignment change problem case study and justification of why the problem in the case study is a problem and the type of problem are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section One: Identifies the Intervention Type Selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application Assignment Paper and Describes the Intervention Process

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately identifies the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment paper and clearly describes the intervention process.

Proficient - Identifies the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment paper and describes the intervention process. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.

Basic - Somewhat accurately identifies the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment paper and vaguely describes the intervention process. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment paper and describe the intervention process; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The identification of the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment paper and description of the intervention process are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Describes the Role of the Consultant During the Intervention

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the role of the consultant during the intervention.

Proficient - Describes the role of the consultant during the intervention. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially describes the role of the consultant during the intervention. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the role of the consultant during the intervention; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description the role of the consultant during the intervention is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Categorizes the Competencies and Ethical Behaviors Needed for the Intervention

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly categorizes the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention.

Proficient - Categorizes the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention. Minor details are inaccurate or missing.

Basic – Minimally categorizes the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention. Relevant details are inaccurate and/or missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to categorize the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention; however, significant details are inaccurate and missing.

Non-Performance - The categorization of the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Defines the Recommended Research Methods That Will Be Utilized During the Intervention

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly defines the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention.

Proficient - Defines the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially defines the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to define the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The definition of the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Describes the Recommended Data Collection and Evaluation Methods During the Intervention

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes the recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention.

Proficient - Describes the recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially describes the recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description of the recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Defines a Timeline for the Intervention Process

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately defines a timeline for the intervention process.

Proficient - Defines a timeline for the intervention process. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially defines a timeline for the intervention process. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to define a timeline for the intervention process; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The definition of a timeline for the intervention process is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Two: Identifies Anticipated Resistance to the Change and the Process for Reconciliation

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately identifies anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation.

Proficient - Identifies anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation. Minor details are slightly unclear or inaccurate.

Basic - Vaguely identifies anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation. Relevant details are unclear and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation; however, significant details are unclear and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The identification of anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Three: Hypothesizes the Projected Outcomes for the Organizational Development (OD) Change Project

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Methodically hypothesizes the projected outcomes for the OD change project.

Proficient - Hypothesizes the projected outcomes for the OD change project. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally hypothesizes the projected outcomes for the OD change project. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to hypothesize the projected outcomes for the OD change project; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The hypothesis of the projected outcomes for the OD change project is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Section Three: Validates the Reasoning for the Projected Outcome

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Appropriately validates the reasoning for the projected outcome.

Proficient - Validates the reasoning for the projected outcome. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally validates the reasoning for the projected outcome. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to validate the reasoning for the projected outcome; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The validation of the reasoning for the projected outcome is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Conclusion: Concludes With a Summation of the Project

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Concludes with a comprehensive summation of the project.

Proficient - Concludes with a summation of the project. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally concludes with a summation of the project. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to conclude with a summation of the project; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The conclusion of the summation of the project is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Powered by Powered by Logo