In a 2- to 3-page, double-spaced paper, describe three conclusions you have drawn from the findings in this study, taking into consideration the limitations of the study

gradingrubric.html

Home >Nursing homework help >In a 2- to 3-page, double-spaced paper, describe three conclusions you have drawn from the findings in this study, taking into consideration the limitations of the study

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NURS_3150_Week_6_Assignment_Rubric

	Excellent	Proficient	Basic	Needs Improvement
Introduces information on the study: includes purpose of the study, methods and findings.	Points: Points Range: 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Student provided a under-developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:
Proposes three conclusions drawn from findings in the study considering limitations of the study.	Points: Points Range: 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from findings of the study considering the limitations with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitationswith reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitations with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Student provided an under-developed discussion of the three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitationswith little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:
Recommends three implications for clinical practice.	Points: Points Range: 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Student provided a under-developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:
Concludes paper	Points: Points Range: 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Student provided a fully developed conclusion with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Student provided a developed conclusion with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed conclusion with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Student provided a under-developed conclusion with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:
Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 2) 2000/3000 Level	Points: Points Range: 27 (18%) - 30 (20%) Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 3000 AWE level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (16%) - 26 (17.33%) Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 3000 AWE level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (14%) - 23 (15.33%) Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 3000 AWE level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20 (13.33%) Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 3000 AWE level of writing and does not meet the mimium reference requirement. Feedback:
APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1" margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.	Points: Points Range: 18 (12%) - 20 (13.33%) Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 16 (10.67%) - 17 (11.33%) Demonstrates developed APA formatting with minimal formatting errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Introduces information on the study: includes purpose of the study, methods and findings.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Student provided a under-developed discussion of the purpose, methods and findings of the study with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:

Proposes three conclusions drawn from findings in the study considering limitations of the study.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from findings of the study considering the limitations with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitationswith reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitations with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Student provided an under-developed discussion of the three conclusions drawn from the findings of the study considering the limitationswith little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:

Recommends three implications for clinical practice.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 36 (24%) - 40 (26.67%) Student provided a fully developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 32 (21.33%) - 35 (23.33%) Student provided a developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 28 (18.67%) - 31 (20.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 27 (18%) Student provided a under-developed discussion of three implications for clinical practice with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:

Concludes paper--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 9 (6%) - 10 (6.67%) Student provided a fully developed conclusion with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. Proficient 8 (5.33%) - 8 (5.33%) Student provided a developed conclusion with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. Basic 7 (4.67%) - 7 (4.67%) Student provided a minimally-developed conclusion with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 6 (4%) Student provided a under-developed conclusion with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. Feedback:

Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 2) 2000/3000 Level--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (18%) - 30 (20%) Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 3000 AWE level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Proficient 24 (16%) - 26 (17.33%) Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 3000 AWE level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement. Basic 21 (14%) - 23 (15.33%) Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Uses evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 3000 AWE level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 20 (13.33%) Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 3000 AWE level of writing and does not meet the mimium reference requirement. Feedback:

APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1" margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.--

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 18 (12%) - 20 (13.33%) Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors. Proficient 16 (10.67%) - 17 (11.33%) Demonstrates developed APA formatting with minimal formatting errors. Basic 14 (9.33%) - 15 (10%) Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several formatting errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0%) - 13 (8.67%) Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting errors. Feedback:

Total Points: 150