Stage 4 due in 36 hours
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
Far Above Standards
Above Standards
Meets Standards
Below Standards
Well Below Standards
Criterion Score
How the Proposed IT Solution Meets the Requirements How the IT solution aligns with achieving the strategy, improving the process, and meets the requirements
15 points
14-15 Points
Clear, complete, compelling and related to the Case Study and Vendor Brochure; demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
13 points
12-13 points
Complete and related to the Case Study and Vendor Brochure; demonstrates effective analysis.
10 points
10-11 points
Provided and related to the Case Study.
9 points
9 points
Incomplete, inaccurate and/or not related to the Case Study.
0 points
0-8 points
Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.
Score of How the Proposed IT Solution Meets the Requirements How the IT solution aligns with achieving the strategy, improving the process, and meets the requirements,/ 15
Implementation Steps An introduction and all areas (vendor agreement, hardware/ telecom, configuration, testing, employee preparation, data migration, and maintenance) Generally, 0-5 points each. Both quantity and quality evaluated.
35 points
31.5-35 Points
Clearly and thoroughly included introduction and covered all areas, strongly derived from the Case Study and vendor brochure, and demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
All 7 areas well done.
31 points
28-31 Points
Clearly covered and included introduction and all areas, derived from the Case Study and vendor brochure, and demonstrates effective analysis and writing.
6 areas covered
26 points
24.5-27 Points
Covered and included introduction and majority of areas and related to the Case Study and the vendor brochure.
5 areas covered
22 points
21-24 points
All areas not covered, and/or are not related to the Case Study and/or the vendor brochure.
4 areas covered.
0 points
0-20 Points
Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.
3 or fewer areas covered.
Score of Implementation Steps An introduction and all areas (vendor agreement, hardware/ telecom, configuration, testing, employee preparation, data migration, and maintenance) Generally, 0-5 points each. Both quantity and quality evaluated.,/ 35
Summary and Conclusion Summarizes the BA&SR and provides a compelling explanation of benefits to be gained
10 points
9-10 Points
Provides strong, clear and concise summary; demonstrates sophisticated analysis and writing.
8.5 points
8.5 Points
Provides clear summary; demonstrates effective analysis and writing.
7.5 points
7.5 Points
Provides summary.
6.5 points
6.5 points
Lacks sufficient information to provide adequate summary.
0 points
0-5 Points
Content missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section.
Score of Summary and Conclusion Summarizes the BA&SR and provides a compelling explanation of benefits to be gained,/ 10
Research Three or more sources—one is the vendor brochure, one from within the IFSM 300 course content, and one external (other than the course materials)
15 points
14-15 Points
Required resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
13 points
12-13 Points
At least three sources are incorporated (vendor, course content and external) and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style.
11 points
10-11 Points
Fewer than 3 resources properly incorporated, and/or reference(s) are not cited using APA style.
9 points
9 Points
A source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations.
0 points
0-8 Points
No course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text
Score of Research Three or more sources—one is the vendor brochure, one from within the IFSM 300 course content, and one external (other than the course materials),/ 15
Complete BA&SR Report Well organized and clearly presented information.
15 points
14-15 Points
Document is a very effective and cohesive assemblage of the four sections, is well formatted and flows smoothly from one section to the next.
12 points
12-13 Points
Document is a good assemblage of the four sections with appropriate formatting and flow.
10.5 points
10-11
Document includes content for all four stages; lacks a cohesive presentation and flow.
9 points
9 Points
Incomplete stages; lack of continuity of flow and presentation of final information
.
0 points
0-8 Points
Incomplete report, missing stages, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or not well compiled and presented as a cohesive document.
Score of Complete BA&SR Report Well organized and clearly presented information.,/ 15
Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and complete Reference Page including sources for all 4 stages.
10 points
9-10 Points
Very well organized and is easy to read. Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person, contains all required references, and presented in a professional format.
8.5 points
8.5 points
Effective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person, contains all required references, and presented in a professional format.
7.5 points
7.5 Points
Some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; missing some required references. Report is double spaced, and written in third person.
6.5 points
6.5 Points
Not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced, missing several required references, and written in third person.
0 points
0-5 Points
Extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, missing required references, or does not convey the information.
Score of Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and complete Reference Page including sources for all 4 stages.,/ 10
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
/ 100
Overall Score
Overall Score
90-100% Far Above Standards90 points minimum
80-89% Above Standards80 points minimum
70-79% Meets Standards70 points minimum
60-69% Below Standards60 points minimum