Summary in 700 Words
|
|
Excellent/Outsta nding |
|
Very Good/Good |
|
Satisfactory/Below Average |
|
Marginal/Failing |
|
Accuracy |
All important details are included in chronological order in the summary and reflected in the response. |
|
Important details are included but some might be missing in the summary and are not always clearly reflected in the response. |
|
Some critical information is missing or incorrectly ordered in the summary and/or inaccurately reflected in the response. |
|
Contains only some details; does not accurately reflect the points of reading or respond accurately. |
|
Comprehension |
Demonstrates clear understanding of the focus of the reading |
|
Demonstrates adequate understanding |
|
Demonstrates basic understanding of information in text |
|
Demonstrates little or no understanding |
|
Style and Conventions |
Writing is characterized by paraphrasing of the main idea and significant details without always using direct quotes |
|
Writing is characterized by paraphrasing of the main idea and some details; some reliance on direct quotes |
|
Writing is characterized by substantial copying of key phrases and minimal paraphrasing; direct quotes are used extensively to articulate ideas and formulate responses |
|
Writing is characterized by the substantial copying of indiscriminately selected phrases or sentences. |
|
Focus |
Summary is clear and concise; response includes a thesis that is relevant to the reading; target audience is evident |
|
Summary is a bit wordy; response is somewhat vague; thesis is evident but it may be underdeveloped; target audience is vague or over complicated |
|
Summary has some inconsistencies; Response is unclear in places or not always related to the reading; thesis is vague and undeveloped; target audience is unclear |
|
No clear focus in the response; no clear thesis or direction in the argument; target audience is not discussed or implied |
|
Paragraph Development |
Paragraphs are connected to a main idea (thesis) and cohere as distinct units; topic sentences are used to maintain focus and connect logically to each other; audience profile is either incorporated into the response or discussed in a |
|
Paragraphs are loosely connected to the thesis; paragraphs may attempt to cover too little or too much and may not always be logically connect; audience profile is occassionally incorporated into the response; no separate paragraph included to evaluate target |
|
Connection to thesis is unclear; paragraphs lack focus and/or development; audience profile is alluded to but not explicitly discussed within the assignment |
|
There is no clear connection between the thesis and/or the paragraphs; audience profile is not evident in the assignment |
|
|
separate paragraph |
|
audience |
|
|
|
|
|
Development |
Points are |
|
Points are |
|
Points are only |
|
There is no |
|
and Support of |
supported with |
|
occassionally |
|
supported with vague |
|
support for |
|
ideas |
specific |
|
supported with |
|
examples; ideas are not |
|
claims; ideas are |
|
|
examples. Ideas |
|
specific examples; |
|
fully explained or |
|
not clearly |
|
|
are explained |
|
ideas are not |
|
supported; there are |
|
explained; no |
|
|
fully. Necessary |
|
always fully |
|
problems with logic and |
|
acknowledgement |
|
|
context is |
|
explained; there are |
|
connection between |
|
of audience |
|
|
provided for |
|
problems with the |
|
argument and evidence; |
|
|
|
|
reader |
|
way quotations and |
|
audience needs/interests |
|
|
|
|
comprehension. |
|
praphrases are |
|
are occassionally |
|
|
|
|
Quotation, |
|
integrated; |
|
addressed |
|
|
|
|
paraphrase, and |
|
audience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
summary are |
|
needs/interests are |
|
|
|
|
|
|
used effectively; |
|
addressed most of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
audience needs |
|
the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
are addressed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
A clear principle |
|
There is a vague |
|
The organization of the |
|
There is no clear |
|
and Structure |
of organization |
|
principle of |
|
assignment is unclear or |
|
oganization of the |
|
|
is maintained. |
|
organization; parts |
|
confusing. |
|
assignment |
|
|
Assignment |
|
are not always |
|
|
|
|
|
|
structure |
|
clearly connected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
maximizes the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
overall purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transitions and |
Details in both |
|
Ideas are in logical |
|
Ideas are in random |
|
Ideas are not |
|
Connections |
the summary |
|
order but not |
|
order and not always |
|
connected |
|
|
and the response |
|
always clearly |
|
logically connected; |
|
logically in any |
|
|
are logical and |
|
connected with |
|
transitions are only |
|
way; transitions |
|
|
clearly |
|
appropriate |
|
used occassionally |
|
are not used |
|
|
connected; |
|
transitions |
|
and/or inappropriately |
|
between |
|
|
transitions are |
|
|
|
|
|
sentences or |
|
|
always used |
|
|
|
|
|
paragraphs |
|
|
effectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
between |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sentences and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paragraphs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Documentation |
APA format is |
|
APA format is used |
|
APA is not consistently |
|
There are no |
|
Style and |
used correctly |
|
correctly most of |
|
used in the assignment; |
|
citations used in |
|
Conventions |
throughout the |
|
the time; there may |
|
there are problems with |
|
this assignment; |
|
|
assignment; |
|
be problems with |
|
the way source |
|
there is no |
|
|
References are |
|
the way citations |
|
information is cited |
|
bibliography |
|
|
cited in-text and |
|
are integrated |
|
|
|
included (NOTE: |
|
|
in a correctly |
|
and/or cited both |
|
|
|
this will result in |
|
|
formatted |
|
in-text and in the |
|
|
|
a failing grade). |
|
|
bibliography |
|
bibliography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
included at the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end of the paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar and |
Uses grammar |
|
Uses grammar and |
|
>10 grammatical or |
|
Multiple grammar |
|
Punctuation |
and punctuation |
|
punctuation |
|
punctuation errors |
|
and punctuation |
|
|
correctly |
|
correctly most of |
|
|
|
errors; >15 |
|
|
throughout |
|
the time |
|
|
|
|