Presentation

profileAzu@Azu
GradingRubric.docx

NR328 Ethical Dilemma Presentation

NR328 Ethical Dilemma Presentation

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professionalism

1. Team members are professionally dressed. 2. Team is introduced and assigned roles are identified prior to starting the presentation. 3. Full group participation. 4. Respectful and professional language is used throughout the presentation. 5. Adhere to the time limit of 15 minutes.

5.0 pts

Highest Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section.

4.0 pts

High Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.

3.0 pts

Satisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

2.0 pts

Unsatisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

0.0 pts

Not Present

Includes 1 or no requirements for section.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Team Presentation

1. Description of the dilemma is clear and includes statistical significance to Pediatric nursing. 2. Both positions of the dilemma are presented crediting supporting scholarly sources. 3. Appropriate ethical principle(s) to support each position are used. 4. Consideration of which, if any, ethical principles are in conflict with the opposing positions. 5. Three (3) provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics that apply to the ethical dilemma are used. 6. Present all pertinent resources available to resolve the dilemma. 7. Explain how resources could help in resolving the dilemma. 8. Discuss possible outcomes of each position. 9. Present a plan for resolving the issue.

50.0 pts

Highest Performance

Includes no fewer than 9 requirements for section.

40.0 pts

High Performance

Includes no fewer than 8 requirements for section.

30.0 pts

Satisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 7 requirements for section.

20.0 pts

Unsatisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 6 requirements for section.

0.0 pts

Not Present

Includes5 or fewer requirements for section.

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Team Poster

1. Full names of all team members included and team member initials are present in the assigned sections. 2. Content is presented clearly and scholarly. 3. Citations included for each section. 4. Poster includes sections for title, dilemma description, Statistical significance, Ethical principles, Applicable ANA Code of Ethics Provisions, Resources to resolve dilemma, Potential outcomes of the dilemma, Plan for resolving the dilemma, Key Points, and References.

15.0 pts

Highest Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.

10.0 pts

High Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

7.0 pts

Satisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

5.0 pts

Unsatisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 1 requirements for section.

0.0 pts

Not Present

No requirements for this section presented.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Notes and Reflection

1. Title page with assigned individual part identified. 2. Citations throughout. 3. Ideas presented clearly. 4. At least two (2) sources used to support work. 5. Reference page. 6. Reflection of own values and morals.

20.0 pts

Highest Performance

Includes no fewer than 6 requirements for section.

15.0 pts

High Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section.

10.0 pts

Satisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.

5.0 pts

Unsatisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

0.0 pts

Not Present

Includes 2 or fewer requirements for section.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Poster APA Style and Organization

1. References are submitted with assignment. 2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors. 3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 4. At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided 5. One (1) scholarly source must be the ANA Code of Ethics and each position must be supported by a scholarly source.

10.0 pts

Highest Performance

Includes no fewer than 5 requirements for section.

8.0 pts

High Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section.

6.0 pts

Satisfactory Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

4.0 pts

Unsatisfactory Performance

Includes 1-2 requirements for section.

0.0 pts

Not Present

No requirements for this section presented.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0