Project Closure & Lessons Learned + Curriculum Map

profileMona78
GradingRubric-CurriculumMap.pdf

Week 6 Assignment: Curriculum Map

Grading Rubric

Failing Below Average

Average Above Average Superior

0 - 60 (F range)

70 - 79 (C range)

80 - 89 (B range)

90 - 93 (A- range)

94 - 100 (A range)

Topical Content & Focus (65%)

Curriculum Map does not include all four key areas, and/or does not includes accurate data from the Curriculum Map Requirements assignment. The appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is not covered in the Curriculum Map, and the Curriculum Map requirements may or may not be accurate and accurately interpreted and explained.

Curriculum Map includes all four key areas, and includes accurate data from the Curriculum Map Requirements worksheet. Most of the appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is covered in the Curriculum Map Requirements assignment are accurate and accurately interpreted and explained.

Curriculum Map includes all four key areas, and includes accurate data from the Curriculum Map Requirements worksheet. All the appropriate material, as outlined in the assignment guidelines is covered in the Curriculum Map, and the Curriculum Map requirements are accurate and accurately interpreted and explained.

Assignment meets the expectations of ‘Average’ column, but shows a higher degree of understanding of in the interconnectedn ess between the various Curriculum Map attributes and integrates information from the readings in a supportive manner.

Assignment meets the expectations of ‘Above Average’ column, but shows a stronger integration with the details of ethical practices and provides concrete and realistic recommendations that are appropriately defined and defended given the details of the program curriculum and clearly outlines a plan to graduate.

Personal Competencies (15%)

• Critical thinking

• Professional Writing

• Quantitative analysis

• Problem Solving

Submission reflects little to no applicable personal competencies

Submission reflects a minimal applicable personal competencies

Submission reflects both applicable personal competencies in an acceptable manner

Submission strongly reflects applicable personal competencies integrated throughout the assignment

Submission reflects an excellent use of applicable personal competencies integrated throughout the paper in a way that synthesizes the personal competencies

Grammar (10%)

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc. that interfere with comprehensio n. The reader is unable to understand some of the intended meaning.

Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, and/or other writing conventions that distract the reader.

Minimal errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure and/or other writing conventions but the reader is able to understand what the writer meant.

All work grammatically correct with rare misspellings.

All work grammatically correct with rare misspellings.

Formatting (10%)

NOTE: Gross failure to provide PROPER citations and references – particularly

Multiple errors in formatting and document is not formatted in a manner consistent with the

A few errors in formatting and presentation of material is mostly well done, but either lacks professional

Rare errors in formatting and formatting is consistent through the submission and in alignment

Virtually no errors in formatting and makes good use of tables appropriately.

Virtually no errors in formatting and makes good use of tables appropriately.

with regard to direct quotes – will result in sanctions as outlined in the academic honesty policy.

guidelines provided.

formatting or clarity.

with the guidelines by being presented in a clear and professional format.