Case Essay
Criteria |
Exceeds ExpectationsFull Points100% |
MeetsExpectations90% |
Falls Short ofExpectationsDeductions70% |
Content |
Questions wereanswered with a wealth of knowledge fromliterature, logic, andinsight using ethical theories and/or principles, as well as theCode. |
Questions were answered. Paper was logical, mentioning ethical theories or principles, and citing the Code. |
Paper unfocused orincomplete, divergingfrom assignmentquestions, failed toinclude ethical theoriesor principles, or theCode. |
Timeliness andFormat |
Paper submitted beforedue date. Nopunctuation, spelling, orgrammatical errors.Complete within 3pages with bibliographyon 4th page. |
Paper submitted on theassigned due date.Minimal punctuation,spelling, or grammaticalerrors. Paper mostlycompleted on 3 pages. |
Paper submitted after due date. Multiple punctuation, spelling, and grammatical errors. Paper greatly exceeds or falls short of 3 pages. |
Writing and CriticalThinking Skills |
Paper follows logicalsequence of ideasleading to justifiableconclusion. Paragraphsare well developed withtransitional sentences |
Logical sequence ofideas linked toconclusion. Paragraphsdeveloped and mostlyconnected withtransitional sentences |
Conclusion does not follow concepts in the narrative. Paragraphs lack cohesion or transition |
Referencing |
Bibliography includes more than 4 current references in APAformat, using appropriate citations within the narrative. No plagiarism |
Bibliography includes 4references in APAformat using citationswithin the narrative.Plagiarism not detected |
Bibliography has lessthan 4 references, APAformat not followed.Plagiarism may bedetected. |
|
American Nursing Association. (2016). Guide to the Code of Ethics for Nurses: Development, Application, and Interpretation Faculty Pak. Assignment Rubics. Silver Spring, MD. Retrieved from: http://www.1440n.com/ANA/15-335/3/ |