Ethical Management - Masters level
GRADING RUBRIC:
|
|
Excellent-100%-90% |
Average-89%-80% |
Poor-79%-0% |
|
Identification and Analysis of Main Issues/Dilemma |
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues/ dilemmas in the case study and provides an insightful analysis of all issues. |
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most of the issues/ dilemmas in the case study and provide throughout analysis of most of the issues. |
Identifies and demonstrates acceptable understanding of some of the issues/dilemmas in the case study and presents a superficial or incomplete analysis of most some of the issues. |
|
Establish an argument/position |
The paper presents an argument, conclusion or new understanding that acknowledges and explain the consequences and implications in context |
The paper presents an argument, conclusion, or new understanding that the paper justifies by explaining the links between evidence with claims.
|
The paper presents an argument, conclusion or understanding, but it is simplistic or inconsistent, and/or it provides unsupported or illogical links between the evidence and the claim(s).
|
|
Select and use evidence |
The paper demonstrates a compelling argument through effective interpretation and synthesis of the evidence and through describing its relevance and significance. |
The paper supports its conclusion through the compilation of relevant and sufficient evidence.
|
Evidence is presented, but it is insufficient or sometimes inconsistent in supporting the paper’s conclusion or understanding.
|
|
Writing Mechanics |
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. (500 words) |
Presents a clear presentation of ideas however the paper lacks organization and there are occasional grammar or spelling errors. (Less than 500 words) |
Writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Did not follow specific guidelines. (Less than 400 words) |