mental health consultation
Grading rubrics
Evaluates of the Patient’s Symptoms and Presenting Problems Within the Context of One Theoretical Orientation
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Comprehensively evaluates of the patient’s symptoms and presenting problems within the context of one theoretical orientation.
Summarizes Views of the Patient’s Symptoms and Presenting Problems Within the Context of at Least One Historical Perspective and Two Theoretical Orientations Different From the One Used in the Evaluation
Total: 3.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly summarizes views of the patient’s symptoms and presenting problems within the context of at least one historical perspective and two theoretical orientations different from the one used in the evaluation.
Justifies the Use of Diagnostic Manuals and Handbooks Besides the DSM-5 That Might Be Used to Assess the Prospective Patient
Total: 1.50
Distinguished - Fully and clearly justifies the use of diagnostic manuals and handbooks besides the dsm-5 that might be used to assess the prospective patient.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 1.00
Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.50
Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.