|
Criteria
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|
Ethical Issue - Select a specific ethical issue in accord with the LP requirements.
|
0.5 points
The ethical issue selected was within the parameters defined and was narrowed down to a specific concern.
|
0.4 points
The ethical issue selected was within the parameters defined, but was of a general, not specific nature..
|
0.3 points
The ethical issue selected was too broad, and included sub-issues.
|
|
Stakeholders - Identify stakeholders regarding the issue.
|
0.5 points
Three or more of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified.
|
0.4 points
Less than three of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified.
|
0.3 points
None of the stakeholders directly connected with the ethical issue were identified.
|
|
Principles - Choose three normative ethics principles from Conference Session Two for evaluation of the issue.
|
0.5 points
The three principles identified were logically associated with the ethical issue selected.
|
0.4 points
The three principles identified had an ambiguous association with the selected ethical issue.
|
0.3 points
The three principles identified had a weak or no relation with the selected ethical issue.
|
|
Effects of Issue - Determine the effects of the issue upon the stakeholders considering the principles selected.
|
4.5 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the chosen principles demonstrated a critical thinking process.
|
3.6 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the chosen principles demonstrated a good thinking process.
|
2.7 points
The effects of the issue on the stakeholders, according to the chosen principles did not demonstrate logical thinking.
|
|
Matrix Explanation - Explain the choice of issue, the choice of principles, and a short analysis of the research used to identify the actions in the matrix.
|
4 points
The paper provided an excellent explanation of the three required points within the length specified.
|
3.2 points
The paper provided a satisfactory explanation of the three required points, but was short of the length specified.
|
2.4 points
The paper did not provide an explanation for each of the three required points.
|
|
Matrix Construction
|
0.5 points
Matrix was constructed according to specifications.
|
0.4 points
Matrix was constructed generally according to specifications
|
0.3 points
Matrix did not follow specifications.
|
|
APA Compliance
|
1 point
Source citations are in full compliance with APA style requirements.
|
0.8 points
Source citations are in general compliance with APA style requirements.
|
0.6 points
Source citations are not in compliance with APA style requirements.
|
|
Mechanics
|
0.5 points
Grammar, contractions, spelling, and punctuation correctly applied.
|
0.4 points
Few grammar, contractions, spelling, or punctuation errors exist. Underlined errors in MS Word not corrected.
|
0.3 points
Numerous grammar, contractions, and spelling errors. Punctuation not correctly applied. Underlined errors in MS Word not corrected.
|
|
Overall Score
|
Level 1
9.6 or more
|
Level 2
7.2 or more
|
Level 3
0 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtvndrr1
GradingRuberic.docx
0
