Policy powerpoint presentation
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 140 |
Assignment 3: Policy Position Presentation |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Provide a brief overview of your selected issue. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a brief overview of your selected issue. |
Partially provided a brief overview of your selected issue. |
Satisfactorily provided a brief overview of your selected issue. |
Thoroughly provided a brief overview of your selected issue. |
|
2. Use statistical evidence to support your position, and validate your position with peer-reviewed references. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely used statistical evidence to support your position, and did not submit or incompletely validated your position with peer-reviewed references. |
Partially used statistical evidence to support your position, and partially validated your position with peer-reviewed references. |
Satisfactorily used statistical evidence to support your position, and satisfactorily validated your position with peer-reviewed references. |
Thoroughly used statistical evidence to support your position, and thoroughly validated your position with peer-reviewed references. |
|
3. Examine the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue. |
Partially examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue. |
Satisfactorily examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue. |
Thoroughly examined the major strengths and major weaknesses of each issue. |
|
4. Identify the stakeholders. Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified the stakeholders. |
Partially identified the stakeholders. |
Satisfactorily identified the stakeholders. |
Thoroughly identified the stakeholders. |
|
5. Evaluate the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and suggest two (2) courses of action. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and did not submit or incompletely suggested two (2) courses of action. |
Partially evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and partially suggested two (2) courses of action. |
Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and satisfactorily suggested two (2) courses of action. |
Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of two (2) possible solutions and thoroughly suggested two (2) courses of action. |
|
6. Supply a narrative in the note section of each information slide describing what the student would say if he or she were presenting in person. Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely included a narrative in the note section of each information slide. |
Partially provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide. |
Satisfactorily provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide. |
Thoroughly provided a narrative in the note section of each information slide. |
|
7. 3 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
8. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% |
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
|
9. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference Weight: 5% |
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. |
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. |
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. |
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. |
|
10. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% |
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. |
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
|
11. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% |
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |