Project 1

3/21/23, 10:49 PM Project Part 1: Plan

https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/11112/assignments/269498?module_item_id=586999 3/4

Criteria Ratings Pts

8 pts

8 pts

8 pts

7 pts

7 pts

7 pts

5 pts

Scope of the Program

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient

Accurately and thoroughly explained scope of the program, showing the physical and logical boundaries and business processes.

7 to >6.0 pts Acceptable

Accurately explained scope of the program, showing the physical and logical boundaries and business processes. Minor errors or omissions.

6 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not accurately explain scope of the program, showing the physical and logical boundaries and business processes. Major or numerous errors or omissions.Goal/Objective 8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Accurately identified and thoroughly described one or more program goals or objectives.

7 to >6.0 pts Acceptable

Accurately identified and described at least one program goals or objective. Minor errors or omissions.

6 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not accurately identify and describe at least one program goal or objective. Major or numerous errors or omissions.

Asset Inventory

8 to >7.0 pts Proficient

Created an asset inventory that identified and thoroughly described at least three assets that need to be protected. Choices were logical for the business.

7 to >6.0 pts Acceptable

Created an asset inventory that identified and described at least three assets that need to be protected. Choices were logical for the business. Minor errors or omissions.

6 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not create an asset inventory that identified and described at least three assets that need to be protected. Choices were not logical for the business. Major or numerous errors or omissions.Risks 7 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

Accurately and thoroughly described one or more risks associated with each asset. Risks identified were logical for the business.

6 to >5.0 pts Acceptable

Accurately described at least one risk associated with each asset. Risk identified was logical for the business. Minor errors or omissions.

5 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not accurately describe at least one risk associated with each asset. Risk identified was not logical for the business. Major or numerous errors or omissions.Security

Metrics 7 to >6.0 pts Proficient

Accurately and thoroughly described security metrics associated with each asset (one current and one projected). Metrics were logical for the business.

6 to >5.0 pts Acceptable

Accurately described security metrics associated with each asset (one current and one projected). Metrics were logical for the business. Minor errors or omissions.

5 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not accurately describe security metrics associated with each asset (one current and one projected). Metrics were not logical for the business. Major or numerous errors or omissions.

Organization Chart

7 to >6.0 pts Proficient

Created an organization chart accurately showing security roles and responsibilities.

6 to >5.0 pts Acceptable

Created an organization chart accurately showing security roles and responsibilities. Minor errors or omissions.

5 to >0 pts Unacceptable

Did not create an organization chart accurately showing security roles and responsibilities. Major or numerous errors or omissions.Mechanics 5 to >4.0 pts

Proficient 4 to >3.0 pts Acceptable

3 to >0 pts Unacceptable

3/21/23, 10:49 PM Project Part 1: Plan

https://franklin.instructure.com/courses/11112/assignments/269498?module_item_id=586999 4/4

Total Points: 50

Criteria Ratings Pts

Spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA formatting are correct throughout.

Spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA formatting are correct throughout with minor exceptions.

Numerous spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA formatting errors.