Contemporary debates and methods in psychology
Grading Criteria:
|
CRITERIA |
MARKS AWARDED |
|
|
Introduction: |
/ 20 |
|
|
Sets the scene of the essay |
|
|
· ‘Signposts’ the reader to the overall shape of the essay
· Clear definition and explanation of relevant terms / main discussion points
|
Discussion: |
|
|
Detailed description and understanding of key |
|
|
psychological theories and/or constructs |
|
|
Critical assessment and synthesis of relevant |
|
|
psychological literature |
|
|
Evidence of wider reading around the topic to support |
|
|
discussion with a balance of seminal and contemporary |
/ 50 |
|
reference sources |
|
|
Clear focus on answering the question |
|
|
A coherent structure to the essay, presenting a concise |
|
|
argument supported by examples from relevant |
|
|
psychological literature |
|
|
Conclusions: |
|
|
Ability to draw main points of discussion together |
/ 20 |
|
Linkage of conclusions to assignment title |
|
|
Presentation & Referencing: |
|
|
Correct use of grammar, punctuation and spelling |
|
|
Appropriate writing style (use of "third" person) |
|
|
The majority of references are from academic journals |
/ 10 |
|
and primary sources |
|
|
|
|
|
References reported accurately in essay text |
|
|
References reported accurately in attached 'References' |
|
|
section |
|
Students should recognise that the marking criteria are weighted to indicate its importance in relation to the information required.