Grading-Rubric-for-2239-Social-Inequality-Assignment-_1.docx
Grading Rubric for 2239 – Social Inequality – Assignment #1 REFLECTION
|
Content 50%
|
Excellent
|
Very good
|
Good
|
Fair
|
Inadequate
|
|
· Reflection is well cited and well organized. There is an organized bibliography which includes academic works. Writing is clear & thoughtful.
· Paper demonstrates clear engagement with course material
· Information is accurate, well organized, and connected to course concepts.
· Rationale for choosing this event/meeting is clear and applicable to the course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Thinking 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Reflection demonstrates critical thinking, answering a broader “so what?”
· Reflection is meaningful, creative and or engaging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Style 25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Event/activism is analyzed thoroughly using assigned questions as guides or additional applicable rationale
· Student thoughtfully applies course content to analysis and asks meaningful questions about social inequality in the analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
90% - Extraordinary work
80% - Excellent Work, exceeds expectations
70% - Good work, meets all expectations and requirements
60% - Fair work, requires some revisions, clarity, and did not meet all requirements
50% - Some effort has been made. Work was attempted but incomplete, uncited works,
>50% - Did not meet course expectations, significant clarity concerns, inadequate resources/uncited works, overall unsatisfactory
Michelle_Michy
