eth5

7/23/22, 6:06 PM Tonya's Case: Ethics and Professional Codes Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PHI-FPX/PHI-FPX3200/220700/Scoring_Guides/a05_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Tonya's Case: Ethics and Professional Codes Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.

Does not demonstrate sound ethical thinking about ethical theories and moral theories in applying them to a case.

Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.

Demonstrates sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case, and does so with insight and original arguments

Explain professional codes of ethics and apply them to a specific case.

Does not explain professional codes of ethics and apply them to a specific case.

Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case.

Explains professional codes of ethics and applies them to a specific case, and does so with insight and original arguments.

Explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.

Does not explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.

Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study.

Explains organizational documents like mission and value statements and uses them to analyze a case study, and does so with insight and original arguments.

Explain the role of accrediting bodies and apply this understanding in analyzing a case study.

Does not explain the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study.

Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study

Explains the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study, and does so with insight and original arguments.

Provide validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.

Does not provide validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.

Provides minimal validation and support within written communications by including vaguely relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.

Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.

Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations flawlessly.

Produce writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.

Produces writing with many errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.

Produces writing with some errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.

Produces writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.

Produces writing that is consistently superior with no errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.