eth2

7/21/22, 11:13 PM A Right to Experimental Drugs? Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/PHI-FPX/PHI-FPX3200/220700/Scoring_Guides/a02_scoring_guide.html 1/1

A Right to Experimental Drugs? Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Does not identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles, and describes how to apply them to contemporary issues.

Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Does not explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Explains how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Explains how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Analyzes how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues, and identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.

Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Does not explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients, and impartially considers conflicting evidence and other perspectives.

Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre- approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Does not articulate arguments or use examples for and against offering pre- approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Articulates arguments with examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Articulates arguments using examples for and against offering pre- approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Analyzes arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where further information could improve the analysis.

Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.

Does not exhibit proficiency in clear or effective academic writing skills.

Writes in an ineffective and inconsistent manner that does not exhibit effective academic writing skills or deliver the message clearly.

Exhibits proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.

Exhibits proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills, and ensures the writing reflects the quality and expertise expected of a professional.