Please Help me. In despite need. -- The Demise of Arthur Andersen Case financial data from annual reports, SEC court filings, LexisNexis or other news sources, Bloomberg Terminal, or other source
Irawo
Grading_Criteria.docxGrading Criteria
Guidelines:
· Must follow the course assignment guidelines, including content and format.
· Must be submitted by the Due Date.
· Must be submitted via the designated LMS and undergo a plagiarism check.
· Must identify references and citations (not included in word or page count).
|
Category |
Unsatisfactory 10-69% |
Good 70-84% |
Excellent 85-100% |
|
Assignment Requirements |
Work product is missing most of the assignment tasks. Provides an historical account with little to no research, analysis, or critical thinking. Missing most of the content and format guidelines. |
Work product lacks critical thinking and analysis. Response is superficial and lacks preparation. Work product is missing some requirements and/or does not following some content and format guidelines. |
Work product reflects the assigned readings and other external researched information. Response is well developed according to the assignment. Response fully addresses and develops all aspects of the assignment. Meets all content and format guidelines. |
|
Writing Clarity |
Responses are too wordy, irrelevant, or lacks contribution to the overall narrative. Fails to fully answer the questions. Responses have major format, grammatical, spelling, and mechanics errors. |
Some, not all responses are clear, concrete, and coherent with detailed information provided for all questions. Contributes some valuable information to the narrative. Responses have minor format, grammatical, spelling, and mechanics errors. |
Responses are clear, concrete, and coherent with detailed information provided for all questions. Contributes valuable information to the narrative. Answers to questions are wellwritten and use objective evidence and supporting information. Concrete examples are provided for clarity. |
|
Position and Perspective |
Responses summarize all sides or a given issue/problem without taking a position. Or a given perspective is taken without providing |
Response provides a specific position or perspective but lacks rationale for the position or fails to consider all sides of a |
Response provides a specific position or perspective that accounts for complexities of a given issue/problem. The |
|
Category |
Unsatisfactory 10-69% |
Good 70-84% |
Excellent 85-100% |
|
|
rationale for the perspective, decision, and/or recommendation (not a data-driven conclusion). |
given issue/problem. Or the rationale provided is not based on facts and/or unbiased information. Fails to provide a data driven conclusion. |
rationale for a given position is outlined. A clear perspective, decision, and/or recommendation is provided. |
|
Understanding of References & Source material |
Does not include any references, experience, or mention materials from the readings. |
Uses only references from the assigned reading or the case. Or relies too heavily on one source (limited research), personal experience, or noncredible references. |
Uses credible references to readings, or personal experience and outside source material to support comments. Demonstrates understanding of material and properly cites information. |
|
Blooms Taxonomy Skills |
Most of the skills exhibited are in the “remembering” and “understanding” level. Limited to no skills exhibited in the “applying”, “analyzing”, and “evaluating” levels. |
Most of the skills exhibited are in the “applying” level with some in the “analyzing” level. Limited to no skills exhibited in the “evaluating” levels. |
Most of the skills exhibited are in the “analyzing” and “evaluating” levels. |
** failure to meet the guidelines provided above may result in a score between 0-9%
