7-2
jan29
GradedRubric.pdf
PSY 550 Milestone Two Rubric Activity: 7-2 Final Project Milestone Two: Research and Clinical Formulation
Course: PSY-550-X3247 Measurement & Assessment 24TW3
Name: Sule Umit
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Cut Scores
0 / 8
Criterion Feedback
You did not describe the cut-off scores or indicate the ranges for superior through intellectually deficient classifications for the WAIS-IV.
Without knowing her classification, you will not be able to assess Ms. Z’s academic potential for college.
8 points
Describes the test’s cut
scores for “normal” versus
“at-risk” or “clinically
significant”
5.6 points
Describes the test’s cut
scores for “normal” versus
“at-risk” or “clinically
significant,” but the
response contains
inaccuracies or is missing
key information
0 points
Does not describe the cut
scores
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Cultural
Concerns
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not discuss how cultural concerns have been addressed on the WAIS-IV and how these factors might impact test administration.
You do need to state why the test is appropriate to administer to Ms. Z.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Ethical Issues
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not discuss how ethical concerns have been addressed on the WAIS-IV and how these factors might impact test administration.
You do need to add that these factors do not seem to be an issue for Ms. Z and that is why the test is appropriate to administer.
10 points
Assesses any cultural
concerns for their impact
on the effectiveness of
the administration of the
test
7 points
Assesses any cultural
concerns for their impact
on the effectiveness of
the administration of the
test, but response is
cursory or illogical or lacks
detail
0 points
Does not assess any
cultural concerns for their
impact on the
effectiveness of the
administration of the test
10 points
Determines if there are
any ethical issues related
to administering the test
7 points
Determines if there are
any ethical issues related
to administering the test,
but response is cursory or
illogical or lacks detail
0 points
Does not determine if
there are any ethical
issues related to
administering the test
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Methods
0 / 6
Criterion Feedback
You did not discuss how you will communicate the results of the WAIS-IV to Ms. Z. Will you explain them to her using percentile rank,
scaled scores, z-scores, or t-scores? Explain why you think the method you selected is the most appropriate one for her.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Cut Scores
5.6 / 8
Criterion Feedback
In this section you need to discuss the clinical cutoff (T greater than or equal to75) and content cutoff (T greater than 64). Be sure to
include the type of score (T-score) and not just the number, which could be misinterpreted as a raw score. Of course, you would cite the
training manual.
6 points
Assesses the methods of
interpreting and
communicating the results
for their appropriateness
4.2 points
Assesses the methods of
interpreting and
communicating the
results, but response is
cursory or illogical or lacks
detail
0 points
Does not assess the
methods of interpreting
and communicating the
results
8 points
Describes the test’s cut
scores for “normal” versus
“at-risk” or “clinically
significant”
5.6 points
Describes the test’s cut
scores for “normal” versus
“at-risk” or “clinically
significant,” but the
response contains
inaccuracies or is missing
key information
0 points
Does not describe the cut
scores
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Cultural
Concerns
7 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You discussed cultural concerns related to the MMPI-2 and how these factors might impact test administration. You do need discuss why
these factors do not seem to be an issue for Ms. Z and that is why the test is appropriate to administer.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Ethical Issues
7 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You discussed ethical concerns related to the MMPI-2 and how these factors might impact test administration. You do need discuss why
these factors do not seem to be an issue for Ms. Z and that is why the test is appropriate to administer.
10 points
Assesses any cultural
concerns for their impact
on the effectiveness of
the administration of the
test
7 points
Assesses any cultural
concerns for their impact
on the effectiveness of
the administration of the
test, but response is
cursory or illogical or
lacks detail
0 points
Does not assess any
cultural concerns for their
impact on the
effectiveness of the
administration of the test
10 points
Determines if there are
any ethical issues related
to administering the test
7 points
Determines if there are
any ethical issues related
to administering the test,
but response is cursory or
illogical or lacks detail
0 points
Does not determine if
there are any ethical
issues related to
administering the test
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Methods
6 / 6
Criterion Feedback
You discussed how you would use T scores to communicate the results to Ms. Z.
Clinical Formulation:
Results
0 / 8
Criterion Feedback
In this section, the task was to analyze the results of both tests. You are writing this as the psychologist who administered and interpreted
the results of these tests. You will be using these results as the basis for a diagnosis and recommendations.
6 points
Assesses the methods of
interpreting and
communicating the
results for their
appropriateness
4.2 points
Assesses the methods of
interpreting and
communicating the
results, but response is
cursory or illogical or lacks
detail
0 points
Does not assess the
methods of interpreting
and communicating the
results
8 points
Analyzes the results of
the tests using industry-
standard tools
5.6 points
Analyzes the results of
the tests using industry-
standard tools, but
analysis contains
inaccuracies or lacks
detail
0 points
Does not analyze the
results of the tests using
industry-standard tools
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Clinical Formulation:
Diagnosis
5.6 / 8
Criterion Feedback
I agree that depression is a reasonable diagnosis but you did not provide any supporting evidence from the assessment.
Clinical Formulation:
Psychometric Data
0 / 8
Criterion Feedback
You did not provide your recommendation regarding her return to college (which was the reason for the referral). Also, when you write
your treatment plan in the next draft, be sure to consider her TRT score on the MMPI-2, which indicates a resistance to treatment.
8 points
Determines a diagnosis
based on the data
provided
5.6 points
Determines a diagnosis
based on the data
provided, but diagnosis
lacks justification or
detail
0 points
Does not determine the
diagnosis based on the
data provided
8 points
Interprets the
psychometric data from
the test results to address
the reason for the referral
5.6 points
Interprets the
psychometric data from
the test results to address
the reason for the referral,
but submission contains
inaccuracies or is missing
key details
0 points
Does not interpret the
psychometric data from
the test results to address
the reason for the referral
Total 36.8 / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Articulation of
Response
5.6 / 8
Criterion Feedback
Please be sure to review the requirements for this assignment and incorporate the required number of peer reviewed journals and the
most current APA format. Here are some sites that I find helpful https://libguides.snhu.edu/citation or
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
8 points
Submission has no major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization
5.6 points
Submission has major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that
prevent understanding of
ideas
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 71 points or
more. Final calculation of grades can be found in
the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 1 points or more.
Final calculation of grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 0 points or more.
Final calculation of grades can be found in the
gradebook.
