9-1
jan29
GRADEDmILESTONE1.pdf
PSY 550 Milestone One Rubric Activity: 4-2 Final Project Milestone One: Introduction and Research
Course: PSY-550-X3247 Measurement & Assessment 24TW3
Name: Sule Umit
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Introduction: Problem
Statement
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not provide an explanation or reason for the referral. Going forward, be sure to include information about her background as her
history is an important factor to be considered during the analysis of results. Understanding the whole picture strengthens our prediction.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Administered
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
10 points
Develops a problem
statement that identifies
the reason for referral and
the type of assessments
used
7 points
Develops a problem
statement that identifies
the reason for referral and
the type of assessments
used, but statement is
missing key elements
0 points
Does not develop a
problem statement that
identifies the reason for
referral and the type of
assessments used
10 points
Describes how the test is
administered
7 points
Describes how the test is
administered, but
description is cursory or
lacks detail
0 points
Does not describe how
the test is administered
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
You did not describe how the WAIS-IV is administered. This section must include a description of how you, as the test administrator,
conducted the assessment. Did you administer in person or via computer? Why did you make this choice?
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Populations
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not mention how the norms were developed. In this section you need to include details about the norm groups. You are
establishing why this test is appropriate to administer to this client.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Yields
7 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You gave a good description of the information that can be gained through this test. The actual scores belong in a different section. This
section includes only the overview of the information that can be gained and what value it offers the assessment.
10 points
Describes the populations
for which the test is
normed
7 points
Describes the populations
for which the test is
normed, but response
contains inaccuracies or
lacks justification
0 points
Does not describe the
populations for which the
test is normed
10 points
Explains the information
the test yields
7 points
Explains the information
the test yields, but
response lacks sufficient
detail
0 points
Does not explain the
information the test yields
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test One: Reliability and
Validity
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
Going forward you need to discuss the reliability and validity scores and how these scores were obtained. You will want to include that the
reliability for the WAIS-IV is .70-.90 and that it has high validity with other measures of cognition and that validity is maintained by using
the appropriate indices for the age group tested.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Administered
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not describe how the MMPI-II was administered. This section must include a description of how you, as the test administrator,
conducted the assessment.
10 points
Determines the reliability
and validity of the test
when administered to
varying populations
7 points
Determines the reliability
and validity of the test
when administered to
varying populations, but
response contains
inaccuracies
0 points
Does not determine the
reliability and validity of
the test when
administered to varying
populations
10 points
Describes how the test is
administered
7 points
Describes how the test is
administered, but
description is cursory or
lacks detail
0 points
Does not describe how
the test is administered
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Populations
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
You did not describe the population. Going forward be sure to include that the norms were based on a representative sample of the US
population. It requires a 6th grade reading level.
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Yields
7 / 10
Criterion Feedback
Here you need to include that the MMPI-II provides information on a wide range of clinical conditions and that is the purpose for including
it in the assessment. Also, be sure to include why this test is appropriate to include as part of your assessment. (Since it is designed to
assess a wide range of clinical conditions, are you including it to evaluate her depression?). Again, the results do not belong in this section.
10 points
Describes the populations
for which the test is
normed
7 points
Describes the populations
for which the test is
normed, but response
contains inaccuracies or
lacks justification
0 points
Does not describe the
populations for which the
test is normed
10 points
Explains the information
the test yields
7 points
Explains the information
the test yields, but
response lacks sufficient
detail
0 points
Does not explain the
information the test yields
Criteria Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Test and Assessment
Development Analysis:
Test Two: Reliability and
Validity
0 / 10
Criterion Feedback
Going forward you need to discuss the reliability and validity scores and how these scores were obtained. Be sure to include that the CNS,
VRIN, TRIN validity measures were designed to detect non-responding or inconsistent responding.
Articulation of
Response
7 / 10
Criterion Feedback
This milestone was based on Worksheet 2-2, where you cited two articles in APA format for each test (a total of 4 articles). I realize that
you did switch vignettes, but you did not provide new citations. In fact, your only reference was the textbook. There is a listing of
suggested journals as the end of the final rubric.
10 points
Determines the reliability
and validity of the test
when administered to
varying populations
7 points
Determines the reliability
and validity of the test
when administered to
varying populations, but
response contains
inaccuracies
0 points
Does not determine the
reliability and validity of
the test when
administered to varying
populations
10 points
Submission has no major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization
7 points
Submission has major
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical
errors related to citations,
grammar, spelling, syntax,
or organization that
prevent understanding of
ideas
Total 21 / 100
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 71 points or
more. Final calculation of grades can be found in
the gradebook.
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 1 points or more.
Final calculation of grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 0 points or more.
Final calculation of grades can be found in the
gradebook.
