Assignment

Unacceptable Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

CIS353-A1-1 1. Create a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 14.388 (11.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:14.4 (12.00%) - 16.788 (13.99%)

Insufficiently created a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:16.8 (14.00%) - 19.188 (15.99%)

Partially created a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:19.2 (16.00%) - 21.588 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily created a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points:24 (20.00%)

Points Range:21.6 (18.00%) - 24 (20.00%)

Thoroughly created a use-case diagram to include at least three (3) actors for the system described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

CIS353-A1-2 2. Create an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 14.388 (11.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely created an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:14.4 (12.00%) - 16.788 (13.99%)

Insufficiently created an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:16.8 (14.00%) - 19.188 (15.99%)

Partially created an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points Range:19.2 (16.00%) - 21.588 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily created an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Points:24 (20.00%)

Points Range:21.6 (18.00%) - 24 (20.00%)

Thoroughly created an activity diagram for the business process described in this case through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.

CIS353-A1-3 3. Develop a use-case description for each major use case. Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10.788 (8.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely developed a use-case description for each major use case.

Points Range:10.8 (9.00%) - 12.588 (10.49%)

Insufficiently developed a use-case description for each major use case.

Points Range:12.6 (10.50%) - 14.388 (11.99%)

Partially developed a use-case description for each major use case.

Points:14.4 (12.00%)

Points Range:14.4 (12.00%) - 16.188 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily developed a use-case description for each major use case.

Feedback:

You need to follow the format in the book - this is not to be written as a book report format, but follow the technical structure found in our text.

Points Range:16.2 (13.50%) - 18 (15.00%)

Thoroughly developed a use-case description for each major use case.

CIS353-A1-4 4. Verify and validate the functional models for this case. Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10.788 (8.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely verified and did not submit or incompletely validated the functional models for this case.

Points Range:10.8 (9.00%) - 12.588 (10.49%)

Insufficiently verified and insufficiently validated the functional models for this case.

Points:13.5 (11.25%)

Points Range:12.6 (10.50%) - 14.388 (11.99%)

Partially verified and partially validated the functional models for this case.

Feedback:

This needs to be a series of steps showing actions/reactions of system functionality to determine if it is working as designed.

Points Range:14.4 (12.00%) - 16.188 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily verified and satisfactorily validated the functional models for this case.

Points Range:16.2 (13.50%) - 18 (15.00%)

Thoroughly verified and thoroughly validated the functional models for this case.

CIS353-A1-5 5. Create a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system. Weight: 20%

Points:0 (0.00%)

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 14.388 (11.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely created a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system.

Feedback:

Missing - this includes a list of functional and nonfunctional requirements, as well as a project scope statement.

Points Range:14.4 (12.00%) - 16.788 (13.99%)

Insufficiently created a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system.

Points Range:16.8 (14.00%) - 19.188 (15.99%)

Partially created a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system.

Points Range:19.2 (16.00%) - 21.588 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily created a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system.

Points Range:21.6 (18.00%) - 24 (20.00%)

Thoroughly created a high-level requirements document which captures the major functions of the system.

CIS353-A1-6 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 7.188 (5.99%)

More than 8 errors present.

Points Range:7.2 (6.00%) - 8.388 (6.99%)

7-8 errors present.

Points Range:8.4 (7.00%) - 9.588 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present.

Points:10.2 (8.50%)

Points Range:9.6 (8.00%) - 10.788 (8.99%)

3-4 errors present.

Feedback:

Formats of the required elements need to follow our textbook examples.

Points Range:10.8 (9.00%) - 12 (10.00%)

0-2 errors present.