7-2 Milestone Four: The Ethical Decision-Making Process

PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Four Rubric Activity: 7-2 Milestone Four: The Ethical Decision-Making Process

Course: PSY-570-X5305 Ethical Practice in Psych 23TW5

Name: Sule Umit

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Eight-Step Ethical

Decision-Making

Model

16.2 / 18

Criterion Feedback

You successfully outlined the 8 step model but show how it specifically applies to your case study vignette. Support for credibility.

Ethical Strategy 0 / 18

18 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and includes

examples of what

standards and

guidelines should

inform decision

making

16.2 points

Lists the eight-step

ethical decision-

making model and

applies model to

ethical conflict in

case study vignette

12.6 points

Lists the eight-step

ethical decision-

making model but

does not apply model

to ethical conflict in

case study vignette

0 points

Does not list the

eight-step ethical

decision-making

model

18 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and discusses

why proposed ethical

strategy would be

preferable to other

strategies

16.2 points

Develops an ethical

strategy and explains

how it could be

applied to the case’s

ethical conflict

12.6 points

Develops an ethical

strategy but strategy

does not address

ethical conflict

0 points

Does not develop an

ethical strategy

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Criterion Feedback

This was missing.

Alternative

Decision-Making

Model

12.6 / 18

Criterion Feedback

You're on the right track but identify a specific alternative decision making model.

18 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and explains

whether or not model

is supported or

unsupported by

ethical guidelines and

standards

16.2 points

Describes an

alternative decision-

making model and

applies model to

ethical conflict in

case study vignette

12.6 points

Describes an

alternative decision-

making model but

does not apply model

to ethical conflict in

case study vignette

0 points

Does not describe an

alternative decision-

making model

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Statement of

Culture and Social

Orientations

16.2 / 18

Criterion Feedback

Cite for credibility.

18 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and illustrates

with specific,

concrete examples of

how the ethical

strategy considers

issues of diversity and

culture

16.2 points

Explains how culture

and social

orientations

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy and assesses

how strategy

addresses ethical

problems associated

with multicultural

competence issues

12.6 points

Explains how culture

and social

orientations

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy but does not

assess how strategy

addresses ethical

problems associated

with multicultural

competence issues

0 points

Does not explain how

culture and social

orientations

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Statement of

Multiple Role

Relationship Issues

16.2 / 18

Criterion Feedback

Cite for credibility.

APA Writing 4.5 / 5

18 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and illustrates

with specific,

concrete examples of

how the ethical

strategy considers

the appropriateness

of the different

relationships

psychologists can

have with clients

16.2 points

Explains how

considerations of

multiple role

relationship issues

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy and assesses

how strategy

addresses ethical

problems associated

with multiple role

relationship issues

12.6 points

Explains how

considerations of

multiple role

relationship issues

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy but does not

assess how strategy

addresses ethical

problems associated

with multiple role

relationship issues

0 points

Does not explain how

considerations of

multiple role

relationship issues

influenced the

development of the

proposed ethical

strategy

5 points

No errors related to

APA style or citations

4.5 points

Minor errors related

to APA style and

citations

3.5 points

Some errors related

to APA style and

citations

0 points

Major errors related

to APA style and

citations

Total 70.7 / 100

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Criterion Feedback

APA citations missing.

Articulation of

Response

5 / 55 points

Submission is free of

errors related to

grammar, spelling,

syntax, and

organization and is

presented in a

professional and easy

to read format with

language that is

appropriate to the

intended audience

4.5 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization

or audience-

appropriate

terminology

3.5 points

Submission has some

errors related to

grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization,

or audience-

appropriate language

that negatively

impact readability

and articulation of

main ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors related

to grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization,

or audience-specific

language that prevent

understanding of

ideas

Overall Score

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 91

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 71

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 1

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 0

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.