5 page assessment

profileDelissia36
GoodandEviledit.pdf

Good and Evil 

The concepts of good and evil or right and wrong have been debated throughout human history.  Arguments surrounding those concepts have led to the question of whether good and evil truly  exist. The interpretations surrounding the concepts of good and evil have further complicated  the matter, particularly in ethics, religion, psychology, and philosophy, where such interpretations  are diverse. All the same, all the four fields, religion, ethics, psychology, and philosophy, view  good and evil from the same perspective. That is to say; they are in agreement that good and  evil are right and wrong respectively and that doing what is good means doing what is  acceptable, while doing evil is involving oneself in what is unacceptable (Taylor, 2013). Also, the  religious, ethicists, philosophers, and psychologists agree that those who do evil possess  common qualities, and those who indulge in good deeds also share a lot in common. Generally,  this shows that the concepts of right and wrong are human constructs. To be precise, they are  not limited to religion, ethics, or any other field. This paper investigates the general concepts of  good and evil, right and wrong. YOUR INTRODUCTION DOESN’T REALLY PREPARE YOUR  READER FOR YOUR PAPER. INSTEAD OF TALKING ABOUT WHAT OTHERS HAVE TALKED  ABOUT AND WHAT OTHER GROUPS OF PEOPLE THINK GOOD AND EVIL ARE, INSTEAD TALK  ABOUT HOW YOU DEFINE GOOD AND EVIL AND HOW YOU SEE THOSE DEFINITIONS WORKING  IN THE TEXTS THAT WE READ AS A CLASS. 

 

Defining Good-Evil 

Taylor (2013) defines “good’ as a lack of self-centeredness. In other words, good is the ability to  show compassion or empathize with other people. By being good, one sacrifices their wellbeing  for the sake of others. In other words, good is about prioritizing others' interests as opposed to  putting individual interests first. Taylor asserts that ‘good’ concerns altruism, benevolence,  self-centeredness, and self-sacrifice aimed at a greater cause (2013). EVERY SENTENCE IN  THIS PARAGRAPH SHOULD BE CITED. REARANGING THE AUTHOR’S WORDS AND  PRESENTING THEM AS YOUR OWN IS PLAGIARISM. INSTEAD OF USING SOMEONE ELSE’S 

IDEAS ABOUT WHAT GOOD AND EVIL IS, IT WOULD BE FAR MORE WORTHWHILE TO CREAT  YOUR OWN DEFINITIONS. 

 

 

On the other hand, evil refers to the lack of empathy. To be specific, evil is an aspect of being  wicked or immoral. In a nutshell, evil is the opposite of good. Therefore, people who involve  themselves in wicked or sinful acts cannot empathize with other people (Taylor, 2013).  Specifically, evil people prioritize their own needs and desires instead of other people’s needs  and desires. As such, they are self-centered. 

What it means to do Good or Evil 

To do good, as mentioned above, is to be compassionate or empathetic to others. It is to be  morally upright, having high standards of decency, being welcoming and pleasing. Moreover, to  do good is to be gentle, selfless, benevolent, and kind (Hasa, 2017). Also, it is to put the interests  of others before personal interests. Doing charity work, helping someone in need, and helping a  jobless person with employment are examples of good actions. WHY ARE YOU DEFING GOOD  AGAIN? 

Meanwhile, to do evil, as noted earlier, is to do the opposite of good. As Hasa notes, doing evil is  to do something harmful to other people (2017). It is to be selfish, immoral, and wicked. Rape,  murder, robbery, violence, cruelty, and adultery are examples of evil actions (Hasa, 2017). IS  WHY ARE YOU REDEFINING THESE TERMS 

Good and evil concepts are not restricted to a certain area like religion, ethics or philosophy. In  fact, good and evil are human constructs that also have nothing to do with a deity. In other  words, good and evil are not determined by a god or religion. This can be attributed to the fact  that good and evil might have been in existence long before religion and gods were discovered. 

It is imperative to note that areas such as religion have only formalized ethical codes of conduct  that already existed prior to religion and gods' birth. I DON’T SEE THIS HELPING YOUR  ARGUMENT 

According to the Iliad and the Inferno writers, right and wrong are concepts of human notions of  morality and ethics (Classical Literature, n.d., Hollander, 2000). In Iliad, Homer presents the  ancient Greek people's gods as bad (Classical Literature, n.d.). Unlike the deity of the  Judeo-Christian and Islamic religions that are presented as good, Greek gods in Homer's The  Iliad are unwise and imprudent. They are deceitful, vain, and unpredictable. WHERE DO YOU SEE  THIS ? CITE There are good and evil deities or gods in the Judeo-Christian religions, represented  by God and Satan. This demonstrates that deities may not determine good and evil. HOW DOES  IT DO THAT ? 

Fundamentally, good and evil are not as absolute as they may seem to be. To be precise, both  are relative and vigorous and are prone to changes and adaptation at different times. Also, good  and evil vary, often considerably, between diverse peoples and or cultures. Therefore, the  concepts of right and wrong and doing good or evil are determined by communal existence  instead of philosophical principles, a deity, or religious teachings. Accordingly, as a community  creates and develops the practices and customs that define right and wrong, such practices are  construed to be essential for the moral order that defines what should be acceptable and  unacceptable behavior. INSTEAD OF SAYING THIS YOU NEED TO SHOW WHERE YOU SEE IT IN  THE texts that we read. 

According to Homer, there are no permanently designed people to be good and others evil  (Classical Literature, n.d.). <-IS THIS A QUOTE ? (YOU NEED TO REDO THIS CITATION, THE LINK  DOES NOT WORK.) Indeed, we have also witnessed situations in which a person does right at  some point and later engages in unacceptable behavior. In Homer's The Iliad, Achilleus and  Hektor cannot be said to be good or evil (Classical Literature, n.d.). It is uncommon to  characterize a person as neither a good one nor an evil one. This is because an individual may  choose to do the right thing today and do the wrong thing tomorrow. This proves that both good  and evil are dynamic and relative as well. 

I believe that people, including myself, are likely to behave in either way. Often, when egocentric  impulses force us to prioritize our own needs, we may do evil things. However, when 

compassion and sympathy compel us to put our needs aside and prioritize the needs and  desires of others, we may do ‘good’. THIS SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE CONCLUDING 

Common Qualities among Evil Doers 

Evildoers share a lot in common. All evildoers, including the corrupt serial killers and or  murderers, thieves, dictators, and rapists, share the same characteristics. Particularly, evildoers  are selfish people. They pursue self-interests. They pursue gains such as material wealth,  recognition in society, occupational achievements, happiness, and social status. WHERE DO  YOU SEE THIS IN THE TEXTS WE READ? Also, evildoers are sadists and egoists who are  excessively concerned with their pleasure or benefits at others' expense. According to Taylor  (2013), evildoers are selfish, narcissistic, and self-absorbing. If people attempt to show  selflessness towards other people, they do so only to fulfill their own needs, not because they  are compassionate. That is to say; evildoers can only value others when they want to exploit  them or satisfy their own needs and desires (Taylor, 2013). 

WHY IS THIS A NEW PARAGRAPH ? They are not in a position to sense other people’s feelings  or emotions. They view other people as objects; hence, their sufferings do not matter to them as  long as they (evildoers) achieve their goals. In general, their most common trait is an inability to  be kind to others. 

 

 

 

Also, evil people want to control others and or everything. Specifically, all evil people want to be  in charge of everything. WHERE DO YOU SEE THIS IN THE TEXTS ? They want to have their way  and are prepared to do anything to ensure that they have succeeded. In this regard, they will  manipulate other people and situations to achieve their will (Hollander, 2000). Furthermore, 

evildoers conceal their true colors. One may not likely know that a person is bad until they have  acted. They are mean and seldom take responsibility for their evil actions. 

Common Qualities among Good Doers 

Meanwhile, good people also share many common traits. For instance, they are compassionate.  Generally, good people show empathy toward others. After all, empathy is the most attribute of  ‘good’ and good people. Also, good people are selfless. WHERE DO YOU SEE THIS IN THE  TEXTS? That is to say, people who do ‘good’ are ever concerned with the interests of others.  Their concerns never come first. As noted earlier, the doers of good are even ready to sacrifice  their happiness and satisfaction for others' sake. 

Conclusion 

Overall, the concepts of good and evil are not fixed. This means that an individual can develop  empathy or lose it; thus, becoming good or evil, respectively. Importantly, as discussed in this  paper, right and wrong concepts are not determined by deities or any particular field such as  religion or philosophy. Humans - people and or cultures determine the idea of right and wrong.  Good or right is associated with the values or qualities of empathy, selflessness, and  self-sacrifice. Nevertheless, evil or wrong is associated with a lack of empathy, selfishness, and  other vices. 

 

 

 

References 

Classical Literature. (n.d.). The Iliad – Homer – Poem. Retrieved from  http://www.ancient-literature.com/greece_homer-iliad-html THIS LINK DOES NOT WORK 

Hasa. (2017). Difference between good and evil. Retrieved from  https://www.differencebetween.com/differences-between-good-and-vs-evil/ 

Hollander, R. (2000). Note on inferno I: In Robert and Jean Hollander, trans., The inferno by  Dante. New York: Random House. 

Taylor, S. (2013). The real meaning of ‘good’ and ‘evil’. Retrieved from  https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/out-the-darkness/201308/the-real-meaning-good-a nd-evil 

 

 

FIRST AND FOREMOST, YOU MUST ENSURE THAT YOU USE QUOTES WHEN YOU ARE USING  PEOPLE’S EXACT WORDS. SECOND, WHEN YOU ARE PARAPHRASING WHAT THEY SAY, YOU  MUST ALSO PROVIDE A CITAITON. 

 

ONCE YOU HAVE COMPLETELY DONE THOSE TWO THINGS, YOU MUST TALK ABOUT THE  TEXTS WE READ AS A CLASS IN EACH OF YOUR BODY PARAGRPAHS. THE PURPOSE OF THE  PAPER WASN’T TO SPEAK ABOUT GOOD AN EVIL IN GENERAL BUT TO DEMONSTRATE HOW  YOU SEE THE CONCEPTS PRESENTING THEMSELVES IN THE LITERATURE WE READ. THIS IS,  AFTER ALL, A LITERATURE CLASS. 

202103_ENG_205_KNA 

Data retention summary 

For those of you still struggling:  

Here is a possible outline you could use to help you.  

INTRO: GOOD AND EVIL CAN BE SEEN IN THE TEXTS OF Iliad and The Inferno 

thesis: something like GOOD AND EVIL can be defined.  

 

1​ST​ BODY DEFINE GOOD . 

FIND AN EXAMPLE FROM EITHER TEXT THAT EXEMPLIFIES GOOD . 

EXPLAIN WHY THAT EXAMPLE IS POWERFUL/ MEANINGFUL WHY IT IS INTERESTING   

 

2​ND​ BODY PARAGRAPH  

DEFINE EVIL 

FIND AN EXAMPLE FROM EITHER TEXT THAT EXEMPLIFIES EVIL . 

EXPLAIN WHY THAT EXAMPLE IS POWERFUL/ MEANINGFUL WHY IT IS INTERESTING   

  

3RD BODY PARAGRPAH 

WHAT ARE SOME ATTRIBUTES OF EVIL ? 

IN OTHER WORDS YOU DEFINED EVIL , MAYBE IT’S BAD, MAYBE IT’S THE OPPOSITE OF GOOD,  BUT WHAT HAPPENS TO A PERSON WHEN THEY COMMIT AN EVIL ACT? WHAT IF THEY KEEP  DOING THE EVIL THING? DO THEY FEEL BAD , GUILTY ? ARE THEY MORE LIKELY TO COMMIT  MORE EVIL ACTS? PICK SOMETHING PARTICULARLY EVIL, SUCH AS MURDER OR TORTURE.  FIND AN EXAMPLE FROM ONE OF THE TEXTS TO ANALYZE. 

  

4​TH​ BODY PARAGRAPH 

FURTHER ANALYSIS OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF EVIL 

DOES EVIL LITERALLY INFECT OTHER PEOPLE ? IF A PERSON HURTS SOMEONE  DELIBERATELY IN AN AWFUL WAY, IS THAT PERSON THE SAME? IS THEIR HAPPINESS  AFFECTED. DOES EVIL MAKE THE WORLD A WORSE PLACE? FIND AN EXAMPLE FROM ONE OF  THE TEXTS TO ANALYZE. 

 

5​TH​ BODY PARAGRAPH 

WHAT ARE SOME ATTRIBUTES OF GOOD? 

IN OTHER WORDS YOU DEFINED GOOD, MAYBE IT’S NOT BAD, MAYBE IT’S THE OPPOSITE OF  EVIL, BUT WHAT HAPPENS TO A PERSON WHEN THEY COMMIT AN ACT OF GOOD? WHAT IF  THEY KEEP DOING THE GOOD THINGS? WILL THEY START TO FEEL BETTER ABOUT  THEMSELVES? IS THE WORLD AFFECT IN A POSSITIVE WAY? FIND AN EXAMPLE FROM ONE  OF THE TEXTS TO ANALYZE. 

 

CONCLUSION: 

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO KNOW EACH OF THESE POINTS ?   

paragraph 1 point   

paragraph 2 point 

paragraph 3 point   

paragraph 4 point 

paragraph 5 point   

make a general point about understanding good and evil