Project
Role of Hand Washing Hygiene in Prevention of Under-Five Diarrheal Diseases
Golden Hands Program Plan
for
Preschool Children
at
Obafemi Awolowo University International Staff School, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
Oluwasola Ayosanmi, Chukwuebuka Ogwo
Save The Children (STC) Team
Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois
Golden Hands Program, 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Diarrheal disease has been noted as one of the commonest causes of mortality in under
five children globally (United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), 2017). The diarrheal disease
burden among under five children is enormous in Nigeria (World Health Organization (WHO),
2016). In fact, approximately 37 percent of the preschool children in Nigeria suffer from a
diarrheal disease at any given time (Okeke et al, 2000). A major source of this infection is a lack
of good hygiene practices. Of interest is that hand washing hygiene is a major factor in the
prevention of infections from the microbes that are involved in diarrheal disease, which is most
often caused by feco-oral transmission (Curtis, & Camicross, 2003).
The Save the Children (STC) team has embarked on a preventive health program named
Golden Hands Program, which will be adopted among the preschool children at Obafemi
Awolowo University (OAU) International Staff School, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Golden
Hands Program is developed with the mission of promoting childhood well-being and preventing
diarrheal diseases among the preschool children. It is the hope of STC that the Golden Hands
Program will enhance the adoption of hand washing hygiene practices among children. The
ultimate outcome pursued by STC is to reduce the incidence of diarrheal disease among
preschool children at OAU International Staff School by 50 percent.
Golden Hands Program Intervention will run for 30 weeks, and funded through a grant of
$15,000. Save the Children Team (STC) will install a borehole facility and three hand washing
basins at OAU International Staff School as part of the intervention for the Golden Hands
Program. There will be a kickoff ceremony for community sensitization followed by eight-week
learning periods for the preschool children to enhance mastery of the hand hygiene practices.
Golden Hands Program, 3
PROGRAM RATIONALE
Diarrheal disease is one of the oldest diseases in humans (Centers for Disease Control,
and Prevention, 2015). Diarrhea can be defined as the excretion of three or more loose or watery
feces daily (or frequent stooling abnormal for the individual) (World Health Organization WHO,
2003). Diarrhea is usually an indicator of intestinal tract infection, which can be caused by a
variety of microorganisms like viruses, bacteria and parasites, resulting in a marked loss of
essential body fluid and electrolytes and ultimately causing death (WHO, 2016). Diarrheal
disease-causing pathogens are often transmitted via the feco-oral means (Curtis, Cairncross, &
Yonli, 2000) through intake of infected food and water, immediate contact with infected fecal
matter, or by person-to-person contact (Eisenberg, Trostle, Sorensen, & Shields, 2012). Some
clinical trials have shown that more than 75 percent of diarrhea cases can be linked to food and
water contamination (Curtis, Cairncross, & Yonli, 2000) (Maxwell, Oklo, & Bernard, 2012).
Globally, nearly two billion cases of diarrheal disease occur annually and roughly two
million children below the age of five, mostly in developing countries, succumb to this condition
(MacGill, 2017). It is the second most common cause of under-five mortality behind respiratory
infections and it is largely preventable and treatable (WHO, 2016). In 2011 alone, about three-
quarter of a million children below the age of 5 years were lost to the complications of diarrhea
(Lamberti, Fischer Walker, & Black, 2012). Diarrhea accounted for nine per cent of all under
five mortality recorded worldwide in 2015, which means that more than 1,400 children die daily,
or about 526,000 children annually, in spite of existing simple effective cure regimen (UNICEF,
2017). An estimated 72.8 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) is lost annually via
disability and early mortality, especially in resource poor countries (Murray, Vos, Lozano,
Naghavi, Flaxman, & Michaud, et al. 2012).
Golden Hands Program, 4
About 42 percent of the global diarrhea burden occurs in the WHO African region
(Bryce, Boschi-Pinto, Shibuya, & Black, 2005). Despite the global decline in mortality rates in
children from 146 per 1,000 live births in 1970 to 79 per 1,000 live births in 2003 (WHO, 2005),
the story is markedly different in Africa. In comparison to other world regions, the African
region has the least reduction rate in deaths and the most remarkable trend in decline. The rate of
under-five mortality in Europe is seven times lower than that in Africa (WHO, 2005).
Several factors contribute to high rate of diarrhea under five in Nigeria and they include
poor hand washing hygiene of caregivers, poor food and water sanitation, lack of rotavirus
vaccination, and poor breastfeeding habit (WHO, 2016). However, studies have linked poor hand
hygiene practices of caregivers of children as one of the most common contributing factor of
diarrhea among children under five (Iroegbu, Ene-Obong, Uwaegute, &Amazigo, 2000)
(Mannan, & Rahman, 2011) (Pickering, Julian, Mamuya, Boehm, & Davis, 2011). Contaminated
hands have been largely implicated in the spread of a large number of foodborne disease
outbreaks; thus, the risk of foodborne diseases and associated ailments can be significantly
reduced by appropriate hand washing practices (WHO, 2016).
The major ways to prevent diarrhea include safe drinkable water; proper and enhanced
sanitation; good handwashing hygiene practices such as handwashing with soap and water,
exclusively breastfeeding a child from birth to the first six months, proper personal hygiene,
good food hygiene, health education about etiology and pathogenesis of the disease and rotavirus
vaccination. According to the World Health Organization Water for Health report 2001, it is
estimated that hand hygiene practices such as handwashing with soap and running water could
half the deaths associated with diarrheal disease (WHO, 2001). Another study in London
published by Lancet in 2003 also estimated that one million deaths associated with diarrhea
Golden Hands Program, 5
could be averted yearly if everyone routinely washed their hands (Curtis, & Camicross, 2003). A
randomized controlled trial executed in 16 primary schools using 6,000 students showed that
hand hygiene provided in the classroom reduced school absenteeism due to infection by 19.8
percent (Hammond, Ali, Fendler, Dolan, & Donovan, 2000). Study have shown that $3.35
invested in handwashing yields an equivalent health benefit as $11.00 invested in toilet
construction, a $200.00 spent in household water supply and thousands of dollars spent on
immunization (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), 2008). A
Cochrane review of 22 randomized controlled trials regarding the role of hand hygiene in
diarrhea prevention revealed that handwashing promotion in both rich and poor countries may
reduce the incidence of diarrhea by about 30 percent (Ejemot-Nwadiaro, Ehiri, Arikpo,
Meremikwu, & Critchley, 2015).
Golden Hands Program is therefore designed to reduce the problem of diarrhea-related
under-five mortalities by promoting handwashing hygiene among teachers, parents and children
through education on the best and most effective hand washing technique, importance and health
benefit of washing hand, how often hand washing should be done as well as providing running
taps inside and outside the classrooms through a pumped well system in Obafemi Awolowo
University (OAU) International Staff School, Nigeria.
Golden Hands Program, 6
GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM PLANNING
The program planning model used for the Golden Hands Program is the MAP-IT
(Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement and Track) model. MAP-IT was chosen because it blends
both the community and evidence-based ideologies of health planning (Healthy People 2020,
2017). The MAP-IT model is ideal for the Golden Hands program because the “Mobilize”
section highlights the importance of identification, involvement, and formation of a coalition
with (1) stakeholders, specifically pharmaceutical industries and telecommunication industries
such as MTN and GLO; (2) partners specifically Osun State Ministry of Education and Ministry
of Health; (3) individuals; (4) community and religious leaders who are needed for the Golden
Hand program to be successful and sustainable. The MAP-IT phases are fairly similar to the
generalized program planning model, except for the Mobilize phase. This model was also chosen
because of the fluidity, flexibility, and functionality of its phases.
Constructs from two theories of health behavior - Social Cognitive Theory and Health
Belief Model will be employed as the theoretical basis of the Golden Hands program. The Social
Cognitive Theory constructs to be used will include self-efficacy, observational learning, and
facilitation/behavioral capability. All constructs from the Health Belief Model will be used.
The self-efficacy construct of Social Cognitive Theory was chosen because the theory
believes that increasing the confidence or belief in one's capability to carry out a given behavior
can help improve their health behavior (Bandura, 1977). Intervention components specifically
targeting ways to increase self-efficacy such as vicarious experience, mastery experience, verbal
persuasion, and improving physical and emotional state, will be used. This implies that
increasing the confidence of the school children on their ability to perform hand washing
regularly, will make them improve their hand washing habit. According to a longitudinal study
Golden Hands Program, 7
done to evaluate the effectiveness of short motivational and self-assisted handwashing
interventions, self-efficacy was found to be highly useful for the improvement of hand hygiene
practice (Lhakhang, Lippke, Knoll, & Schwarzer, 2015). Observational Learning was chosen
because this construct of social cognitive theory believes that a certain health behavior can be
improved by watching similar individuals or role models do the new task. This implies that the
handwashing habit of children can be improved by using their teachers and parents as role
models as well as educating them with an audiovisual content of children of similar age
performing the same handwashing behavior. The Facilitation/Behavioral Capability construct
was chosen because it deals with providing materials, resources, or changes in the environment
that facilitate the easy performance of new behaviors. This implies that training the children and
teachers on how to wash hands and the provision of running water in the school could improve
the uptake of hand washing behavior.
The Health Belief Model was chosen because it takes into account an individual’s
perception of possible barriers to health behavior change as well as their perception of threat
(Rosenstock, Irwin, 1974). The perceived threat (perceived susceptibility and perceived severity)
and perceived benefit constructs of this theory were chosen because it captures the role of
parents in maintaining handwashing habit in children. Children are likely to maintain their
handwashing behavior if their parents perceive they are threatened or see the benefit of hand
washing. Perceived barrier was chosen because the constructs believe that removal of barriers to
a particular health behavior will help improve the health behavior. This implies that provision of
running water and soap in school can help in the adoption of handwashing behavior. Cues to
action were chosen because the construct recognizes the role of external factors (such as parental
Golden Hands Program, 8
influence, posters, and signage) on individual perceptions, such as perceived benefits, and
perceived susceptibility.
GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM INTERVENTION
Mission statement
The mission of the Golden Hands Program is to promote childhood well-being and
reduce diarrheal disease among preschool children of OAU international school in Nigeria
through hand washing hygiene practices.
Goal
To promote handwashing hygiene practices among preschool children of OAU
international school in Nigeria through hand washing hygiene practices.
Objectives
Prior to the commencement of the Golden Hands Program, teachers of OAU International
Staff School will deliver a program advertisement and notification letters to the preschool
children and their parents in the month preceding the program commencement.
By the end of the Golden Hands Program, 50 percent of the participants will be able to
demonstrate the techniques of hand washing, mention three benefits of hand washing hygiene
and identify one germ that causes diarrheal disease among the pupils.
Within three months of the start of the Golden Hands Program, at least 50 percent of the
preschool children will demonstrate hand washing before a meal and after using the bathroom
every day in the school.
Golden Hands Program, 9
Within three months of the start of the Golden Hands Program, at least 50 percent of the
parents of the preschool children will report their children demonstrate handwashing at home
daily after arriving from school, before a meal and after using the bathroom.
Within six months of the start of Golden Hands Program, there will be 50 percent
reduction in the passage of loose watery stool among the preschool children.
Golden Hands Program will be implemented as an after-school program that will meet
thrice weekly from 12:00 noon to 1:00 pm (during school lunch break) for eight weeks. It will
take place at the OAU international staff school, Ile-Ife, Osun State Nigeria. Facilities needed
include school learning facilities such as classroom, stereo equipment, projector and projector
screen, borehole water and running taps as well as handwashing equipment (handwashing basin,
paper towels, and trash bins).
Prior to implementation, there will be the installation of a borehole running water system
that will include three handwashing basins in the three classes of preschool children at OAU
International Staff School. STC will engage in a social marketing campaign for Golden Hands
Program prior to the kick off date. Each preschool child will go home with a flier to share with
parents. Posters and fliers will be posted throughout the school, OAU campus, grocery stores,
town halls, churches, mosques and the staff quarters recreation centers. A Facebook and web
page advertisement will be set up. A bulk short message service (SMS) will be sent to all parents
and guardians of the preschool children. Television and radio commercials will be made.
Newspaper advertisement will also be done in four national and local newspaper publications.
Marketing the program will begin six weeks before the commencement of the program.
Golden Hands Program, 10
The Golden Hands Program will embark on the training of the personnel that will partake
in the implementation. The teachers, medical student volunteers, the Community Health
Education Specialist and the STC team will meet for two weeks prior to the Golden Hands kick
off day. This meeting will be held three times in a week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
during the lunch break of the school at one of the preschool classroom. In this training, the
facilitators will be trained and strategize on the implementation of the Golden Hands Program.
The teachers will be given logbooks, which they will use to assess the performance of the
children during and after implementation of Golden Hands. The handwashing practices of the
children will be recorded in the school every day using the logbook and the record of the stool
frequency will be recorded using the Bristol Stool count (Bristol stool scale, 2017). The teachers
will also be instructed to give a copy of the logbook to each pupil for their parents to use to
assess them at home and bring to school every Monday for a review.
Golden Hands Program will kick off with an opening ceremony. Important dignitaries
will be invited to the opening ceremony. In this ceremony, there will be an official
commissioning of the Golden Hands borehole pipe-borne water system by the executive
governor of Osun State, Nigeria. There will be a keynote address by the Honorable Minister of
Health, Federal Republic of Nigeria. This will address the theme of the program which is
‘making the children germ free’. All members of the public will be invited to the Golden Hands
Program opening ceremony. The royal father of the day will be His Royal Majesty, the Ooni of
Ile-Ife, Oba Ogunlesi. The vice-chancellor of OAU will be among the dignitaries. Golden Hands
T-shirt will be distributed to all attendee of the opening ceremony.
The Golden Hands Program session will meet three times a week for one hour during the
school lunch hour. The days of the week chosen will be Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday. Each
Golden Hands Program, 11
meeting session will have a different song and rhyme composed to address the teaching for the
day. The songs and rhymes will have both an English and Yoruba language version. Golden
Hands education segment will last for 30 minutes. Only the preschool children within the age of
three and five years will be selected for the program. During the Golden Hands Program,
participants will be served fruit and water. Four different fruits will be taken throughout the
program. These fruits are Mango, Guava, Apple and Cashew. One fruit will be taken for each
week and the washing of the fruits will be demonstrated and practiced throughout the program.
Hand washing after eating the fruits will be demonstrated and practiced. This is aimed at
enabling the children to master the hand washing behavior.
The first day of the Golden Hand Program, there will be a general introduction to the
Golden Hands Program and an overview of the activities. The children will watch a cartoon
video on hand washing demonstrated by children of their age downloaded from YouTube. The
first day of contact in each week will be for the recall of previous lessons and to watch a video
during the education segment. After the education segment, the children will take the fruit of the
week and demonstrate handwashing and fruits washing. The second day of the program will be a
short lesson on benefits of handwashing hygiene. Three benefits will be taught throughout the
program. Each benefit will be discussed on every second meeting day in the week. One song will
be learned about the benefit discussed for the day. This education session will be followed by the
fruit of the week session where the children will wash their hands and their fruits. The third day
of the program will be for teaching about the germs that cause watery stool. Three germs will be
considered. One germ will be learned each week and a rhyme will be memorized about the germ
and its prevention. this will be followed by the fruits of the week session. A handwashing
demonstration will be done each day with an emphasis on routine hand washing before a meal,
Golden Hands Program, 12
after using the bathroom and following arrival at home. The teachers will be encouraged to sing
the songs learned in class every day, and a daily class recitation of the rhyme will be done.
The timeline for the Golden Hands Program stretches over 30 weeks beginning with the
program rationale development during the initial four weeks. Needs assessment and development
of goals and objectives are allotted three weeks and two weeks respectively in the timeline. The
formation of the intervention, along with a gathering of resources will take four weeks. The
marketing of the program will take place from week six through week nine (four weeks’
duration). The Golden Hands program will kick off in the 10th week with a pilot study lasting
through the 17th week (eight weeks’ duration). During this time, weekly participation data will be
collected for the eight weeks’ period. Performance and mastery of the program will be assessed
and documented. The remaining weeks after the program will be used for evaluation of the
program to see the impact of the Golden Hands Program. Data of frequency of diarrhea will be
collected throughout during and after the Golden Hands Program using the Bristol Stool Chart
(Bristol stool chart, 2017). Data collected will be carefully analyzed at the end of the program
and the information gathered will be presented to the stakeholders. The Golden Hand Program
data and feedback will be used for program readjustment in the future and plan for the
subsequent phase of the program. Table two shows a detailed timeline.
The Golden Hands Program will need a lot of both human and non-human resources for
its implementation. The human resources needed are three preschool teachers to monitor the
participants, 10 medical students in community medicine rotation to serve as volunteers and
work with the facilitators, three community health education specialists to deliver health
education on hand washing hygiene. The education resources will be gathered from free
resources such as kidshealth.org, youtube.com/watch v, and www.partselect.com/handwashfor
Golden Hands Program, 13
kids. These materials were chosen because they are free, reliable and appropriate for educating
preschool children. A classroom for preschool will be used as the space for this program. There
are three classrooms for preschool children in OAU international staff school and one of the
classrooms will be used. The classroom chosen for the program demonstration will be the one
with good electricity connection but the handwashing basin will be installed in all three
classrooms. The school management will give approval for use of the classroom and adopt the
program at no cost. The Golden Hands program will be held at the Oduduwa Multipurpose Hall
located inside OAU campus at no cost. All these details were negotiated with the State Ministry
of Education and Management of OAU international school. Table three shows clearly all
equipment and supplies that need to be purchased. The school will provide the space for
construction of borehole water supply plant and the plumbing work, while the Golden Hands
Program facilitators will purchase the materials needed and pay for the construction from the
grant fund. Other items needed include promotion materials (T-shirts and logoed reusable water
bottles), projector and projector screen, HP laptop to be connected to the projector, electronic
tablets for facilitators for note taking in the field and logbooks, and stool scale for the
participants’ diarrhea tracking. All these will be purchased with the grant funds.
Golden Hands Program is an eight-week program focusing on promoting hand washing
hygiene practices. The majority of the $15,000 grant will be centered on the construction of
borehole, running of pipe-borne water supply and plumbing works, transportation, food,
supplies, and marketing materials for the program. Donations of fruits from the OAU community
farmers and bottled water from OAU water bottling company will help take care of some of the
costs. Only the community health education specialist will be paid $10 per hour for their services
throughout the 8 weeks. All activities will be done within the school premises. The STC team
Golden Hands Program, 14
will ensure that the grant money is judiciously spent for the preschool children and school health
promotion. See table 3 for the detailed budget.
GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM EVALUATION PLAN
The purpose of evaluation is to determine the value, worth, efficacy, or effectiveness of a
program. Evaluation of the Golden Hands Program will aid program planners to ensure that the
program objectives are met and to determine if any possible changes are needed in the future.
Five types of evaluation – formative, process, impact, summative and outcome evaluations - will
be done by the STC team. Members of this team are Chukwuebuka Ogwo, and Stephen
Ayosanmi.
The Golden Hands Program will be implemented in the OAU International School in
Nigeria as an after-school program that meets thrice in a week from 12:00 noon to 1:00 pm
(during school lunch break) for eight weeks and provide hand hygiene education to preschool
children between the age three to five. Due to the high burden of diarrheal diseases in Nigeria,
the Golden Hands Program was developed with the aim of reducing diarrheal disease among
preschool children of OAU International School in Nigeria through the promotion of
handwashing hygiene practices. OAU International School in Nigeria was specifically chosen for
Golden Hands Program because a study revealed that over one-third (37percent) of under 5
children in this environment suffer from diarrhea (Okeke, Lamikanra, Steinruck, & Kaper,
2000), and also because the school is easily accessible with normally distributed
sociodemographic features.
The Golden Hands Program intends to achieve the goal through these objectives: (1)
Prior to the commencement of the Golden Hands Program, teachers of OAU International Staff
Golden Hands Program, 15
School will deliver a program advertisement and notification letters to the preschool children and
their parents in the month before the program commencement. (2) At the end of the Golden
Hands Program, 50 percent of the participants will be able to demonstrate the techniques of hand
washing, mention 3 benefits of hand washing hygiene and identify one germ that causes
diarrheal disease among the pupils. (3) Within first three months of the start of the Golden Hands
Program, at least 50 percent of the preschool children will demonstrate hand washing before a
meal and after using the bathroom every day in the school. (4) Within three months of the start of
the Golden Hands Program, at least 50 percent of the parents of the preschool children will
report their children demonstrate handwashing at home daily after arriving from school, before a
meal and after using the bathroom. (5) Within six months of the start of the Golden Hands
Program, there will be 50 percent reduction in the passage of loose watery stool among the
preschool children.
Several resources will be needed to implement the Golden Hands Program. These include
personnel, educational materials, pipe borne water equipment and infrastructures. The personnel
involved are three preschool teachers to monitor the participants, 10 volunteer medical students
in community medicine rotation whom will work with the facilitators, three community health
education specialists to deliver health education on handwashing hygiene. The educational
resources will be gathered from free and reliable resources such as kidshealth.org,
youtube.com/watch v, and www.partselect.com/handwashfor kids.
The stakeholders for the Golden Hands Program will include: (1) OAU international
school administration, (2) the Save the Children Team, (3) the preschool teachers and volunteer
workers, (4) three community health education specialists, (5) the funding body, (6) the major
businesses/companies that made donations to the program. Depending on the stakeholders’ role,
Golden Hands Program, 16
each stakeholder can choose to evaluate the program differently. The Golden Hands Program is
following the recommendations of the Logic model (Alter, Egan, 1997).
OAU International School administration will be involved in (1) contractual agreements,
in which OAU International School administration highlight the things they want the program
planning committee to evaluate, how they want the data collection to be done. The
administration will also include how they want the data collected to be analyzed, and presented,
ensure legal and ethical process is followed in reporting, and the evaluation protocols are
followed judiciously; (2) formative evaluation, where program planners will use OAU
international school administration’s input to assure that the Golden Hands Program use
realizable methods in meeting the children’s needs and accounting for what was done; (3)
process evaluation, in which they assess if all the adequate procedure were followed; (4) impact
evaluation, where it will use the short-term findings of the Golden Hands program to check if the
program served the correct target population and if participants’ needs were met; (5) summative
evaluation, where they will utilize findings from the program to determine if is achieving its
goals; (6) Outcome evaluation, where they will be required to say their views regarding the best
ways to sustain the program, as well as receive an end report of the program. This method of
evaluation will lure the OAU International School administration to get involved because they
share in both the success and failure of this program.
Program planning committee will be responsible for the program evaluation via the
following: (1) contractual agreements, where all the details are spelt out especially with regards
to operational modalities; (2) formative evaluation, where the sources for already existing
programs are checked which can be used as template for Golden Hands Program, formulate work
plan and budget; (4) process evaluation, where by members will take notes and keep an
Golden Hands Program, 17
inventory of events, setbacks, expenses, other activities; (5) impact evaluation, in which the
views of each member is collected to know what is going well, what is to be changed; (6)
summative evaluation, to measure effects of the Golden Hands Program on participants to check
any possible changes, whether program strategies need to be altered, to organize reports, and to
make comparison with other related programs; (7) outcome evaluation, where every member of
the committee will be required to say something about the sustainability and long-term goal of
the program, what possible changes should be made for the next cycle of implementation. The
outcome and process evaluation will involve mostly the pre-school teachers and volunteers. We
will ask for their input on ways to fortify the program, track the progress of events, setbacks and
costs as well as measure their opinion on what needs to be changed. An evaluation report and
progress report from the pre-school teachers and volunteers will be obtained during the staff
training weekly. At the end of the program, the evaluation report will be discussed with this
group. The participant’s parents of children who are part of the program will receive a final
report (outcomes evaluation) of the program.
According to the grant requirements, there is a need to submit evaluation reports to the
funding/grant awarding agency. The evaluation reports will include (1) formative evaluation,
within which results obtained will be used to support the funding requests for Golden Hands
program; (2) process evaluation, within which the progress report of the program in terms of
logistics will be presented to them; (3) impact evaluation, where they will receive results
regarding the short-term progress of the program; (4) outcome evaluation, where they will
receive a long term result and final evaluation of the Golden Hands Program success and
significance. The program donors like businesses, organizations or individuals will be involved
in process and impact evaluations, where the results regarding the progress of the program and
Golden Hands Program, 18
short-term impact on participants will be shared with them. Donations will be solicited by
sending out solicitation letters and, then a gratitude letter attached to the results of the
evaluations.
The process, impact, and outcome evaluations are the three evaluations that will be done.
These evaluations were chosen because they (1) agree with the MAP-IT planning model which
was used for Golden Hands Program, (2) help in evaluating the objectives, the short, medium
and long-term Golden Hands Program outcomes, and (3) offer information regarding likely
implementation changes needed in the future. For instance, a process evaluation will show if
hand hygiene education was delivered as designed and intended. Not following the protocol may
affect the overall sustainability and effectiveness of Golden Hands Program. The impact
evaluation will be used to measure any short-term/immediate changes in handwashing habit that
might have occurred as a result of the Golden Hands Program. Outcome evaluation will be used
to determine the long-term impact of Golden Hands Program on diarrhea reduction,
improvement in the quality of life, and to measure if hand washing behavior will be sustained
over time.
Conventional approach and participatory approaches will be used for the Golden Hands
Program. The participatory approach will be used for process evaluation, while the impact and
outcome evaluation will be done using conventional approach. The participatory approach was
chosen because Golden Hands Program planners would like volunteers, teachers, participants,
and everyone directly involved in the Golden Hands Program to participate and give their input
in order to improve the program. The conventional approach for impact and outcome evaluation
was chosen because only facilitators are allowed access to the data and have obtained training in
Golden Hands Program, 19
research and data analysis, and the funders require this type of evaluation for the analysis of final
outcome.
Golden Hands Program will use a non-experimental (pre-test/post-test) design. This was
chosen due to lack of control group or randomization and because of the rigors and cost
associated with experimental studies. The data for impact evaluation of the Golden Hands
program will be collected using a performance chart held and recorded by both the teacher and
parents of the child. The teacher will tick a box each time a child washes his/her hand in school
and the parents will do same at home if the child performs a hand washing activity before and
after eating or playing. The data collected will be analyzed descriptively to show the frequency
of hand washing behavior. Data for outcome evaluation will be collected using the Bristol Stool
Chart by both parents and teachers of this preschool children. The data collection will focus on
presence, absence, and frequency of diarrheal stool by the children. Each parent, as well as the
teacher, will have a chart where they will record the frequency, and consistency of the stool
passed by each child within the timeframe of this study.
SPSS version 23 will be used to analyze all the data collected from this study. Firstly, a
descriptive analysis of the hand washing frequency will be done, then parametric tests like t-test
will be done to compare the continuous dependent variable (diarrheal outcome) and a categorical
independent variable (sex and socioeconomic status). ANOVA test will be done to compare the
difference in a group of more than one categorical independent variables on one dependent
variable. Pearson’s correlation tests will be done check for any association between the
continuous independent variables (age) and the continuous dependent variable (diarrheal
outcome). Multiple logistic regression analysis will be done to ascertain the effect of multiple
factors on the outcome of diarrhea, to eliminate possible confounders, calculate odds ratio at 95
Golden Hands Program, 20
percent confidence interval and to check the interaction between handwashing frequency and
diarrhea outcome. The analysis will be done by the planning committee and in the case of any
analytical issues, a statistician friend will be consulted. To ensure the accuracy and quality of the
data, data will be recorded by two trained individuals before analysis.
Confidentiality of the participants will be maintained by restricting access to the data
collection sheet to committee members only. Each participant will be de-identified by replacing
their names with a code. The master sheet containing the raw data will be kept in a locked file
cabinet in an office and if entered electronically, data files and the computer will be password
protected. All members of the Golden Hands Program planning committee will partake in the
evaluation process and weekly data collection. The results obtained will be discussed at weekly
at the committee meetings and if data suggests that changes are needed, the decision will be
made by the planning committee based on a majority vote. Results will be presented to the
stakeholders through PowerPoint presentations during the biweekly volunteer and committee
meetings. Parents will receive a written report upon completion of the evaluation, and final
report and evaluation will be presented to the OAU international school administration and the
donor agency. Every feedback received from stakeholders will be reflected upon and considered
by the STC team for the future Golden Hands Programs.
Golden Hands Program, 21
REFERENCES
Alter, C., & Egan, M. (1997). Logic modeling: A tool for teaching critical thinking in social
work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 33 (1). Retrieved 11 April, 2017.
Bandura, A (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.
Psychological Review. 84 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191. PMID
847061. Retrieved April 23, 2017.
Bryce, J., Boschi-Pinto, C., Shibuya, K., & Black, R. E. (2005). WHO estimates of the causes of
death in children. The Lancet, 365(9465), 1147-1152. doi:10.1016/s0140-
6736(05)71877-8
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-
Preventable Diseases. Hamborsky J., Kroger A., Wolfe S., eds. (13th ed.). Washington
D.C.: Public Health Foundation. Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/front-matter.html
Curtis, V., Cairncross, S. and Yonli, R. (2000), Review: Domestic hygiene and diarrhea –
pinpointing the problem. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 5: 22–32.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00512.x
Curtis, V., & Cairncross, S. (2003). Effect of washing hands with soap on diarrhoea risk in the
community: a systematic review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 3(5), 275-281.
doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00606-6
Das, J. K., Salam, R. A., & Bhutta, Z. A., (2014). Global burden of childhood diarrhea and
interventions, 451–458. doi:10.1097/QCO.0000000000000096
Golden Hands Program, 22
Eisenberg, J. N. S., Trostle, J., Sorensen, R. J. D., & Shields, K. F. (2012). Toward a Systems
Approach to Enteric Pathogen Transmission: From Individual Independence to
Community Interdependence. Annual Review of Public Health, 33, 239–257.
doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124530
Ejemot-Nwadiaro, R. I., Ehiri, J. E., Arikpo, D., Meremikwu, M. M., & Critchley, J. A. (2015).
Handwashing promotion for preventing diarrhea. The Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, (9), 1–95. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004265.pub3
Hammond, B., Ali, Y., Fendler, E., Dolan, M., & Donovan, S. (2000). Effect of hand sanitizer
use on elementary school absenteeism. American Journal of Infection Control, 28(5),
340-346. doi:10.1067/mic.2000.107276
Healthy People 2020. (2017). Program Planning. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from
https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/tools-and-resources/Program-Planning.
Hutton, G., Haller, L., & Bartram, J. (2007). Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and
sanitation interventions. Journal of Water and Health, 5(4), 481.
doi:10.2166/wh.2007.009
Iroegbu C.U., Ene-Obong H.N., Uwaegute A.C., Amazigo U.V., (2000). Bacteriological quality
of weaning food and drinking water given to children of market women in Nigeria:
implications for control of diarrhea. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition,
18(3):157–62. Abstract retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11262769
Lamberti, L. M., Fischer Walker, C. L., & Black, R. E. (2012). Systematic review of diarrhea
duration and severity in children and adults in low- and middle-income countries. BMC
Public Health, 12(1), 276. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-276.
Golden Hands Program, 23
Lhakhang, P., Lippke, S., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2015). Evaluating brief motivational and
self-regulatory hand hygiene interventions: a cross-over longitudinal design. BMC Public
Health, 15, 79. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1453-7. Retrieved 25 March, 2017
Mannan, S. R., & Rahman, M. A. (2011). Exploring the Link Between Food-Hygiene Practices
and Diarrhoea Among the Children of Garments Worker Mothers in Dhaka. Anwer Khan
Modern Medical College Journal, 1(2). doi:10.3329/akmmcj.v1i2.7458
MacGill, M. (2017, January 4). Diarrhea: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatments. Retrieved April
25, 2017, from http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/158634
Maxwell, O., Oklo, A., & Bernard, A. (2012). Profile of Water Related Diseases in Benue State,
Nigeria. American Journal of Human Ecology, 1(3), 87-94.
doi:10.11634/216796221403192
Murray, C. J., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., . . . Lopez, A. D.
(2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21
regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
The Lancet, 380(9859), 2197-2223. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61689-4
Okeke, I. N., Lamikanra, A., Steinrück, H., & Kaper, J. B. (2000). Characterization of
Escherichia coli Strains from Cases of Childhood Diarrhea in Provincial Southwestern
Nigeria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38(1), 7–12.
Pickering, A. J., Julian, T. R., Mamuya, S., Boehm, A. B. and Davis, J. (2011), Bacterial hand
contamination among Tanzanian mothers varies temporally and following household
activities. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 16: 233–239. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
3156.2010.02677.x
Golden Hands Program, 24
Rosenstock, Irwin (1974). Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education &
Behavior. 2 (4): 328–335. doi:10.1177/109019817400200403.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2008). Water and Sanitation - Handwashing.
Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.unicef.org/wcaro/overview_4553.html
United Nations Children's Fund. (2017). Diarrheal Disease. Retrieved May 02, 2017, from
https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-health/diarrhoeal-disease/
World Health Organization (2001). Water for health: taking charge. Pg. 24. Retrieved April 25,
2017 from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wwdreportchap4.pdf
World Health Organization (2005). Mothers and Children Matter—So Does Their Health. In the
World Health Report 2005—Make Every Mother and Child Count. Pg. 12. Retrieved
April 25, 2017 from http://www.who.int/whr/2005/chap1-en.pdf?ua=1
World Health Organization (2013). Diarrheal disease 2013 Fact sheet N°330. Retrieved April 25,
2017 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en/.
World Health Organization (2016). Hand washing and food safety 2016 fact sheet. Updated
September 2016. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs178/en/
Golden Hands Program, 25
APPENDICES
Table 1- DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
Table 2- PROJECTED BUDGET FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
Table 3- TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
Logic model
Program poster
Bristol stool scale
Logoed water bottle
Logoed T-shirt
Golden Hands Program, 26
Table 1: DETAILED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3
WEEK
1-2
1. Introductory activities - 30
minutes
• Introduce Golden Hands
Program to preschool children
• Teach the children the Golden
Hands Program anthem
• Watch video of handwashing
demonstration for kids
2. Demonstration and snacks - 30
minutes
• Handwashing techniques
demonstration.
• Apple fruits will be given to
participants and washing of
the fruits demonstrated.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Learn about one of the
benefits of hand washing
• Learn songs about one
benefit of hand washing
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
• Health educators and
teachers demonstrate hand
washing and help pupils
wash their fruit (apple).
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
Learn about one of the germs
causing watery stool
Learn rhyme on the one germ
prevention
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
• Health educators and class
teachers demonstrate hand
washing and ask pupils to
wash their fruits before
eating.
WEEK
3-4
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Recap last week lessons,
rhyme, and songs.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Learn the 2nd benefit of hand
washing.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Learn about the 2nd germ
causing watery stool
Golden Hands Program, 27
• Sing and recite rhyme
learned previous week.
• Reward good recap and
participation of preschool.
children.
• Watch video of hand
washing demonstration for
kids.
2. Demonstration and snacks- 30
minutes.
• Health educators and class
teachers help pupils watch their
hands.
• Cashew fruits provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Learn songs about the 2nd
benefit of hand washing.
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
• Health educators and class
teachers assist pupils to
watch their hands.
• Fruits (cashew) provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Learn rhyme on the germ
prevention
2. Demonstration and snacks- 30
minutes
• Health educators and class
teachers assist pupils to
wash their hands and
observe pupils watch their
fruits (cashew) before
eating.
WEEK
5-6
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Recap last week lessons, rhyme,
and songs.
• Sing and recite rhyme learned
previous week.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes.
• Learn the 3rd benefit of hand
washing.
• Learn songs about the 3rd
benefit of hand washing.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes.
• learn about the 3rd germ
causing watery stool
• learn rhyme on the germ
prevention
Golden Hands Program, 28
• Reward good recap and
participation of preschool
children.
• Watch video of hand washing
demonstration for kids.
2. Demonstration and snacks - 30
minutes
• Mango fruits provided as snacks
and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe pupils
washing their hands.
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
• Mango fruits provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe
pupils washing their hands.
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
• Mango fruits provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe
pupils washing their hands.
WEEK
7-8
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Recap last week lessons, rhyme,
and songs.
• Sing and recite rhyme learned
previous week.
• Reward good recap and
participation of preschool
children.
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Recall about the three
benefits of hand washing
• Recall on the songs about
the three benefits of hand
washing
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
1. Education and rhyme - 30
minutes
• Recall of the three germs
causing watery stools
• Recall rhyme about the three
germs learned previously.
2. Demonstration and snacks -
30 minutes
Golden Hands Program, 29
2. Demonstration and snacks - 30
minutes
• Guava fruits provided as snacks
and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe pupils
washing their hands and fruits.
• Guava fruits provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe
pupils washing their hands
and fruits.
• Assessment and evaluation
of children
• Guava fruits provided as
snacks and fruits washing
demonstrated.
• Health educators observe
pupils washing their hands
and fruits.
• Assessment and evaluation.
Golden Hands Program, 30
TABLE 3: PROJECTED BUDGET FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
REVENUE AND SUPPORT
Contributions from sponsors:
FRUITS 800 pieces of Mango
800 pieces of Apples
800 pieces of Guava
800 pieces of Cashew
Grants $15,000
Expenditures
Supplies:
Borehole drilling 1 X $2,000 $2000
Plumbing materials and works 1 X $2000 $2000
Projector and projector screens 1 X $500 $500
Golden Hand Logoed Reusable water
bottle
100 X $4 $400
T-shirts 1000 X $5 $5000
Golden Hands Program, 31
Golden Hands Program kick-off
ceremony
TV advertisement
Press release
Newspaper advert
Radio jingle
Golden Hands Program snacks
2 X $100
4 X$50
4 X $100
1 X $100
500 X $20
$200
$200
$400
$100
$1000
Hp laptop 1 X $500 $500
SPSS version 23 1 X $100 (student pack for
12 months)
$100
Samsung tablet 4 X $150 $600
Remunerations for three Community
Health Specialist
$8.25 (per hour) X 3 hours a
week for 8 weeks
$600
Printing
Brochures, flyers, posters $1000
Log book 80 X $4.5 $400
Total expenses $15,000.00
Golden Hands Program, 32
Golden Hands Program, 33
Golden Hands Program, 34
Golden Hands Program, 35
Golden Hands Program, 36
TABLE 2: TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN HANDS PROGRAM
TASKS WEEKS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Development of
program rationale
X X X X
Conduct need
assessment
X X X
Development of
Golden Hands
Program goals and
objectives
X X
Formulation of
interventions
X X X X
Formative evaluation X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Golden Hands Program, 37
Collection of useful
resources
X X X X
Installation of
borehole and running
water
X X X X
Staff and volunteer
training
X X
Social marketing of
Golden Hands
Program
X X X X X
Golden Hands
Program
Kickoff/opening
ceremony
X
Data collection X X X X X X X X X
Golden Hands Program, 38
Summative
evaluation
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Analysis of collected
Data
X X X X
Adjust program X X X X
Present results to
stakeholders
X X X
Plan for next phase
of the program
X X X
Continue with
follow-up for long-
term evaluation
X X X X X X X X X X
Golden Hands Program, 39
Golden Hands Program Logic Model
Inputs
Outputs Outcomes -- Impact
Activities Participation Short Medium Long
• Staff
• Three Community
health workers
• Volunteers (10
Medical students)
• Money ($15,000)
• Fruits
• Golden hands
Program T-shirt
• Golden hands
Program water
bottle
• Social Marketing with posters, fliers,
and media advert.
• Golden Hands Program Free T-shirt
distribution.
• Opening ceremony
• Borehole and handwashing basin
installation
Education and rhyme
• Learn songs and rhyme of hand washing
• Watch video of hand washing
demonstration for kids
Demonstration and snacks
• Health educators demonstrate hand
washing and help pupils wash their
fruits
• 30 Preschool
Children
• Three Teachers
• OAU
international
school
administration
• 10 Volunteer
medical students
• Funding agency
• Ministry of
Education
• Save the
Children (STC)
Team
• Increased hand washing
hygiene practices.
• Increased self-efficacy.
• Increased knowledge of
health merits and
demerits of hand
washing.
• Increased awareness hand
washing hygiene.
• Improved hand washing
skills.
• Increased desire to
change and improve hand
washing habit.
• Reduction in the
incidence of
diarrhea.
• Improvement in
daily hand washing
habit.
• Reduction in school
absenteeism due to
diarrhea-related
disease.
• Adoption of the hand
washing habit.
• Decrease diarrhea-
associated morbidity and
mortality.
• Increased quality of life of
preschool children.
• Reduction in
hospitalization from
diarrhea related cause.
• Reduction in cost
associated with treatment
of diarrhea
Assumptions
External Factors
The intervention was widely accepted by both the children and school administration. The program was
properly funded and funds were used judiciously.
Environmental factors like insecurity, lack of clean water at home and within the community; the
parental level of education and involvement.