For Kim woods only Please : Resubmit of assignment with instructions, and examples

Grading Criteria

Points Possible

Points Earned + Comments

Content, focus, use of research, organization

· Response successfully answers the Assignment question(s); thoroughly uses the text and other literature. Includes a strong thesis statement, introduction, and conclusion. The main points of the paper are developed clearly. All arguments are supported well (no errors in logic) using outside sources as assigned.

· Sources are primarily academic journals, with thoughtful use web sources. References are applied substantively to the paper topic. Skillfully addresses counter-arguments and does not ignore data contradicting its claim. Refers to sources both in-text and in the reference page.

40 points (50%)

Transition from the Unit 1 Focus Paper by using a 1-2 paragraph summary of its recommendations and conclusion as your introduction for this paper.

5

<< Don’t get too hung up on this … just set the stage.

Identification of your organizational archetype and how this affects your structure decisions.

10

<< See p. 90-91 and Figure 6.2 for explanation. This doesn’t need to be a large portion of the paper. Simply identify, include why, and describe how this affects structure decisions.

Selection of two high-level design options. (These will be chosen from the four classic design options and the three primary matrix types.)

10

<< You will simply state two design choices and why you believe them to be logical for your organization’s strategy … how they can solve the “problem” previously identified and help the organization achieve its stated strategy.

<< You might select from the “Building Blocks” – traditional function, geography, product, or customer … OR … you may determine that one of the forms of a matrix will suit your situation best.

Conclusion should briefly summarize the primary points of the paper and recommend a call to action.

5

<< Ensure a nicely written paragraph; don’t summarize what you were supposed to do in the assignment; instead; summarized the main points you made --- be persuasive in winning others to your conclusion and recommendations. Again – if you were a consultant, this is your chance to “close” the deal.

Integration of appropriate outside resources – including in-text citations throughout with a corresponding item on reference list. A minimum of three resources required. At least one resource must be from a peer reviewed (scholarly) journal.

10

<< Most people lose points here by (1) not using peer reviewed (scholarly) source or (2) by using a lot of company documents … ok to use but you must have THREE not including articles about the company … need to compare, contrast, bring in different points of view on the subject – don’t just regurgitate articles others have written about the organization … do original research.

Analysis and critical thinking

· Response exhibits strong higher-order critical thinking and analysis (e.g., evaluation). Paper shows original thought.

· Analysis includes proper classifications, explanations, comparisons, and inferences.

Critical thinking includes appropriate judgments, conclusions, and assessment based on evaluation and synthesis of information.

24 points (30%)

Analysis of each of the four classic design options (function, geographic, product, and customer) using the design criteria selected in your Unit 1 Focus Paper.

12

<< This is an analysis of EACH based on your organization and the design criteria you have determined. Table 5.1 on p. 76 may prove helpful as you work through this. However, be sure you are applying specifically to your organization.

Analysis of the benefits and risks of each of the two high-level design options that you selected.

8

<< You’ve already stated why … now, analyze the risks and benefits of each choice. This will help you define your ultimate top recommendation.

Recommendation for the best grouping option for your selected organization with criteria for this decision.

4

<< This should be clear … you’ve analyzed the top two choices (above) and can use that criteria to select best option. Remember, if they seem equal, ask … which will yield the biggest impact?

Writing style, grammar, APA format

· Appropriate to the Assignment, fresh (interesting to read), accurate, (no far-fetched, unsupported comments), precise (say what you mean), and concise (not wordy).

· Grammatical skills are strong with typically less than one error per page. Project is free of serious errors; grammar, punctuation, and spelling help to clarify the meaning by following accepted conventions.

Project is in 12-point font. Narrative sections are double-spaced. Correct use of APA for citations and references. Title page present and accurate.

16 points (20%)

Writing style

5

<< Remain professional – put on your consultant “hat” more than your academic or employee hat … if you were hired to do this project – what tone would you use to communicate your findings?

Grammar and mechanics – including section headings:

Introduction

Identify Organizational Archetype

Analysis of the Four Classic Design Options

Selection of Two High-level Design Options

Benefits/Risks of High-level Design Options

Recommendation for Best Grouping Option

Conclusion

6

<< Strive for organization and flow … Introduction, Content (Research), Analysis, Recommendations, Conclusion. Don’t make your reader wonder what you are writing about – clarity is important.

Formatting and use of APA

5

<< Write in complete paragraphs (no bullet lists) unless you are using the tables that are recommended.

Total

80 points