GLST 220 CQ DEVELOPMENT PLAN/ACTION PLAN
CQ Development Plan/Action Plan Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content 70% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Challenges, Opportunities and Capabilities |
32 to 35 points All questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper while carefully and thoroughly answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results. |
25 to 31 points All questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper while carefully answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results. |
1 to 24 points Questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper along with adequate answers/responses are given in light of the student’s individual results. |
0 points Not present |
|
Action Plan and Accountability |
32 to 35 points All questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report to the very bottom of the page have been restated within the paper while carefully and thoroughly answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results. |
25 to 31 points All questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report to the very bottom of the page have been restated within the paper while thoroughly giving answers/responses in light of the student’s individual results. |
1 to 24 points Questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report have been restated within the paper along with adequate answers/responses given in light of the student’s individual results. |
0 points
Not present |
|
Structure 30% |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Formatting |
14 to 15 points Exceptional formatting of paper in accordance with the latest edition of the Turabian Style Guide with title page, citations, reference page, and proper headings and subheadings. Does not resemble a cut and paste version of the CQ Report, but is indeed a paper. |
11 to 13 points Well formatted paper in accordance with the latest edition of the Turabian Style Guide with title page, citations, reference page, and proper headings and subheadings. |
1 to 10 points Paper is somewhat in accordance with Turabian style formatting, including some, or all of the following: title page, citations, reference page, clear headings and subheadings. |
0 points
Turabian style formatting is not present |
|
Language |
14 to 15 points Very concise, clear, with consistently proper grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing. |
11 to 13 points Clear, with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing. |
1 to 10 points Periodic errors in grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing within paper.
|
0 points Not present |