GLST 220 CQ DEVELOPMENT PLAN/ACTION PLAN

profilelyn3689
GLST220CQDevelopmentPlanActionPlanGradingRubric20191.docx

CQ Development Plan/Action Plan Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Challenges, Opportunities and Capabilities

32 to 35 points

All questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper while carefully and thoroughly answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results.

25 to 31 points

All questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper while carefully answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results.

1 to 24 points

Questions and statements from pages 9 and 10 of the students’ CQ Report have been restated within the paper along with adequate answers/responses are given in light of the student’s individual results.

0 points

Not present

Action Plan and Accountability

32 to 35 points

All questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report to the very bottom of the page have been restated within the paper while carefully and thoroughly answering/responding in light of the student’s individual results.

25 to 31 points

All questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report to the very bottom of the page have been restated within the paper while thoroughly giving answers/responses in light of the student’s individual results.

1 to 24 points

Questions, statements, and weekly steps from the top of page 11 and 12 of the CQ Report have been restated within the paper along with adequate answers/responses given in light of the student’s individual results.

0 points

Not present

Structure 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Formatting

14 to 15 points

Exceptional formatting of paper in accordance with the latest edition of the Turabian Style Guide with title page, citations, reference page, and proper headings and subheadings. Does not resemble a cut and paste version of the CQ Report, but is indeed a paper.

11 to 13 points

Well formatted paper in accordance with the latest edition of the Turabian Style Guide with title page, citations, reference page, and proper headings and subheadings.

1 to 10 points

Paper is somewhat in accordance with Turabian style formatting, including some, or all of the following: title page, citations, reference page, clear headings and subheadings.

0 points

Turabian style formatting is not present

Language

14 to 15 points

Very concise, clear, with consistently proper grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing.

11 to 13 points

Clear, with minimal errors in grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing.

1 to 10 points

Periodic errors in grammar, spelling, sentence structure and paragraphing within paper.

0 points

Not present