Globe Table Paper
1
Running Head: GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT
2
GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT
3
GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT
Globe Table Assignment
Amber Wilson
University of Maryland Global Campus
|
Dimensions |
India |
Turkey |
|
Performance Orientation |
GLOBE Scores: 6.05 |
GLOBE Scores: 3.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A high rating score |
A low rating score |
|
|
This reveals that Indian society encourages |
This society is classified as a not high |
|
|
and rewards innovation, high standards, and |
performance-oriented one. It is associated |
|
|
performance improvement. |
with low levels of economic productivity, |
|
|
|
direct investors by foreigners and little |
|
|
|
strength in terms of global competitiveness (Francis & F., 2019). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainty Avoidance |
GLOBE Scores:4.73 |
GLOBE Scores: 3.63 |
|
|
A moderate rating score |
A low rating score |
|
|
This society tolerates unpredictability and |
This society tolerates unpredictability and |
|
|
uncertainty to a moderate extent (Francis & F., 2019). |
uncertainty to a significant extent. This is |
|
|
|
mostly due to both economic and political |
|
|
|
instability they have experienced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Humane Orientation |
GLOBE Scores: 5.28 |
GLOBE Score:3.94 |
|
|
A high rating score |
A low rating score |
|
|
Historically Indian culture is deeply rooted |
This society only builds strong relationships |
|
|
with humane orientation as the most striking |
amongst themselves while people outside |
|
|
feature of ancient Indian civilization is its humanity |
their close networks cannot benefit from |
|
|
|
their help or general friendliness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional Collectivism |
GLOBE Scores: 4.71 |
GLOBE Scores: 4.03 |
|
|
A moderate rating score |
A moderate rating score |
|
|
This society shows some features of collectivism |
This society shows some features of |
|
|
only in some areas but does not meet the entire |
collectivism only in some areas but does not |
|
|
features of collective orientation (Francis & F., 2019). |
meet the entire features of collective |
|
|
|
orientation. |
|
|
|
|
|
In-Group Collectivism |
GLOBE Scores: 5.32 |
GLOBE Scores:5.88 |
|
|
A high rating score |
A high score rating |
|
|
This society displays a high level of trust in family |
This society displays a high level of trust in |
|
|
members. This shows commitment especially to |
family members regardless of whether the |
|
|
close interdependent relationships. |
families are members regardless especially |
|
|
|
to close interdependent relationships. |
|
Dimensions |
India |
Turkey |
|
Assertiveness |
GLOBE Scores: 4.76 |
GLOBE Scores:4.53 |
|
|
A high score rating |
A high score rating |
|
|
This is because Indian society has been |
This society is displayed as one that has |
|
|
portrayed as one that has high levels of |
dominance and toughness levels that are |
|
|
toughness and dominance. |
high. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gender Egalitarianism |
GLOBE Scores: 4.51 |
GLOBE Scores: 2.89 |
|
|
A moderate score rating |
A Low score rating |
|
|
This shows that the role of women in the |
In this society, women are required to stay |
|
|
society have gained importance over a |
at home while men engage in activities |
|
|
period of time as opposed to in the past when |
outside the home such as holding power |
|
|
the society was male-dominated. |
and decision making (Friedman, 2016). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Orientation |
GLOBE Scores: 5.60 |
GLOBE Scores: 3.74 |
|
|
A high rating score |
A low rating score |
|
|
This society is very future-oriented and invests |
The people of this society are comfortable |
|
|
a lot in astrological predictions. |
with the status quo. They simply go through |
|
|
|
life and do not bother to plan for the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensions |
India |
Turkey |
|
Power Distance |
GLOBE Scores: 2.64 |
GLOBE Scores: 5.57 |
|
|
Low score rating |
A high score rating |
|
|
Indian culture is hierarchical where the decision |
Organizations have hierarchical structures |
|
|
making is most often taken by the managers or |
that are very steep. Employees lack freedom |
|
|
the senior-most people. The employees or |
to express their ideas and complaints to |
|
|
subordinates in a team are obliged to agree |
those who supervise them. |
|
|
with their managers and they may not have |
|
|
|
an opportunity to disagree (Friedman, 2016). |
|
References
Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2019). ‘True gen’: generation z and its implications for
companies. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer
packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for
companies
Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE). (n.d.).
Retrieved from https://globeproject.com/