Globe Table Paper

profilemarcusj
GlobeTableAssignment2.docx

1

Running Head: GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT

2

GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT

3

GLOBE TABLE ASSIGNMENT

Globe Table Assignment

Amber Wilson

University of Maryland Global Campus

Dimensions

India

Turkey

Performance Orientation

GLOBE Scores: 6.05

GLOBE Scores: 3.83

 

A high rating score

A low rating score

 

This reveals that Indian society encourages

This society is classified as a not high

 

and rewards innovation, high standards, and

performance-oriented one. It is associated

 

performance improvement.

with low levels of economic productivity,

 

 

direct investors by foreigners and little

 

 

strength in terms of global competitiveness (Francis & F., 2019).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uncertainty Avoidance

GLOBE Scores:4.73

GLOBE Scores: 3.63

 

A moderate rating score

A low rating score

 

This society tolerates unpredictability and

This society tolerates unpredictability and

 

uncertainty to a moderate extent (Francis & F., 2019).

uncertainty to a significant extent. This is

 

 

mostly due to both economic and political

 

 

instability they have experienced.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Humane Orientation

GLOBE Scores: 5.28

GLOBE Score:3.94

 

A high rating score

A low rating score

 

Historically Indian culture is deeply rooted

This society only builds strong relationships

 

with humane orientation as the most striking

amongst themselves while people outside

 

feature of ancient Indian civilization is its humanity

their close networks cannot benefit from

 

 

their help or general friendliness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Institutional Collectivism

GLOBE Scores: 4.71

GLOBE Scores: 4.03

 

A moderate rating score

A moderate rating score

 

This society shows some features of collectivism

This society shows some features of

 

only in some areas but does not meet the entire

collectivism only in some areas but does not

 

features of collective orientation (Francis & F., 2019).

meet the entire features of collective

 

 

orientation.

 

 

 

In-Group Collectivism

GLOBE Scores: 5.32

GLOBE Scores:5.88

 

A high rating score

A high score rating

 

This society displays a high level of trust in family

This society displays a high level of trust in

 

members. This shows commitment especially to

family members regardless of whether the

 

close interdependent relationships.

families are members regardless especially

 

 

to close interdependent relationships.

Dimensions

India

Turkey

Assertiveness

GLOBE Scores: 4.76

GLOBE Scores:4.53

 

A high score rating

A high score rating

 

This is because Indian society has been

This society is displayed as one that has

 

portrayed as one that has high levels of

dominance and toughness levels that are

 

toughness and dominance.

high.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gender Egalitarianism

GLOBE Scores: 4.51

GLOBE Scores: 2.89

 

A moderate score rating

A Low score rating

 

This shows that the role of women in the

In this society, women are required to stay

 

society have gained importance over a

at home while men engage in activities

 

period of time as opposed to in the past when

outside the home such as holding power

 

the society was male-dominated.

and decision making (Friedman, 2016).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future Orientation

GLOBE Scores: 5.60

GLOBE Scores: 3.74

 

A high rating score

A low rating score

 

This society is very future-oriented and invests

The people of this society are comfortable

 

a lot in astrological predictions.

with the status quo. They simply go through

 

 

life and do not bother to plan for the future.

 

 

 

Dimensions

India

Turkey

Power Distance

GLOBE Scores: 2.64

GLOBE Scores: 5.57

 

Low score rating

A high score rating

 

Indian culture is hierarchical where the decision

Organizations have hierarchical structures

 

making is most often taken by the managers or

that are very steep. Employees lack freedom

 

the senior-most people. The employees or

to express their ideas and complaints to

 

subordinates in a team are obliged to agree

those who supervise them.

 

with their managers and they may not have

 

 

an opportunity to disagree (Friedman, 2016).

 

References

Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2019). ‘True gen’: generation z and its implications for

companies. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer

packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for

companies

Friedman, T. L. (2016). Thank you for being late. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE). (n.d.).

Retrieved from https://globeproject.com/