HRMN 467 Week 3 - Expatriate adjustment and Global Compensation
Compensation and Rewards
There are a few options when choosing compensation for a global business. The first option is to
maintain companywide pay scales and policies, so for example, all sales staff are paid the same no
matter what country they are in. This can reduce inequalities and simplify recording keeping, but it
does not address some key issues. First, this compensation policy does not address that it can be much
more expensive to live in one place versus another. A salesperson working in Japan has much higher
living expenses than a salesperson working in Peru, for example. As a result, the majority of
organizations thus choose to use a pay banding system based on regions, such as South America,
Europe, and North America. This is called a localized compensation strategy. Microsoft and Kraft Foods
both use this approach. This method provides the best balance of cost-of-living considerations.
However, regional pay banding is not necessarily the ideal solution if the goal is to motivate expatriates
to move. For example, if the employee has been asked to move from Japan to Peru and the salary is
different, by half, for example, there is little motivation for that employee to want to take an assignment
in Peru, thus limiting the potential benefits of mobility for employees and for the company.
One possible option is to pay a similar base salary companywide or regionwide and offer expatriates an
allowance based on specific market conditions in each country. [9]This is called the balance sheet
approach. With this compensation approach, the idea is that the expatriate should have the same
standard of living that he or she would have had at home. Four groups of expenses are looked at in this
approach:
1. Income taxes 2. Housing
3. Goods and services
4. Base salary
5. Overseas premium
The HR professional would estimate these expenses within the home country and costs for the same items in
the host country. The employer then pays differences. In addition, the base salary will normally be in the same
range as the home-country salary, and an overseas premium might be paid owing to the challenge of an
overseas assignment. An overseas premium is an additional bonus for agreeing to take an overseas assignment.
The Balance Sheet Approach to Compensation
Chicago, IL Tokyo Allowance
Tax rate 30% 35% 5% or $288/month
Housing $1250 $1800 $550
Base salary $5400 $5,750 $350
Overseas premium 15% $810
Total allowance $1998
Total salary and allowance
$5400 $7748
Other compensation issues, which will vary greatly from country to country, might include the following:
1. The cost of benefits in another country. Many countries offer universal health care (offset by higher
taxes), and therefore the employee would have health benefits covered while working and paying taxes
in that country. Canada, Finland, and Japan are examples of countries that have this type of coverage. In
countries such as Singapore, all residents receive a catastrophic policy from the government, but they
need to purchase additional insurance for routine care. A number of organizations offer health care for
expatriates relocating to another country in which health care is not already provided.
2. Legally mandated (or culturally accepted) amount of vacation days. For example, in Australia twenty
paid vacation days are required, ten in Canada, thirty in Finland, and five in the Philippines. The average
number of US worker vacation days is fifteen, although the number of days is not federally mandated by
the government, as with the other examples.
3. Legal requirements of profit sharing. For example, in France, the government heavily regulates
profit sharing programs.
4. Pay system that works with the country culture, such as pay systems based on seniority. For
example, Chinese culture focuses heavily on seniority, and pay scales should be developed
according to seniority.
5. Thirteenth month (bonus) structures and expected (sometimes mandated) annual lump-sum
payments. Compensation issues are a major consideration in motivating overseas employees.
A systematic system should be in place to ensure fairness in compensation for all expatriates.