Geographical expert
Geoscience 397 Lab3 Mizuha Kikuiri
Part1
(a)Table1 shows the observation for the relevant plate boundary segments.
|
log/lat(°) |
Age(m.year) |
Width(km) |
Angle(°) |
|
-25/55 |
46.264 |
888.889 |
43 |
|
-28/51 |
46.264 |
861.111 |
43 |
|
-29/41 |
46.264 |
944.44 |
0 |
|
-29/35 |
46.264 |
1083.33 |
0 |
|
-30/30 |
46.264 |
1138.89 |
0 |
Table1: Observation of the plate boundary
At latitude/longitude of -29/41,-29/35, -30/30 we observed plate spreading parallel to longitude so that is why azimuth is shown as 0°.
(b) Table2~5 shows results of using Vel_Azimuth.
Table2: Vel_Azimuth using NUVEL1A for EU/NA
Table3: Vel_Azimuth using Best Fitting for EU/NA
Table4: Vel_Azimuth using MORVEL for EU/NA
Table5: Vel_Azimuth using REVEL for EU/NA
Figure1;Plate Linear Velocity vs. Angular distance between Pole and point for EU/NA
Table6: Vel_Azimuth using NUVEL1A in AF/NA
Table7: Vel_Azimuth using Best Fitting in Af/NA
Table8: Vel_Azimuth using MORVEL in AF/NA
Table9: Vel_Azimuth using REVEL inAF/NA
Figure 2: Plate Linear Velocity vs. Angular distance between Pole and point for AF/NA
Plate Linear Velocity vs. Angular Distance between Pole and Point
108.59954475767189 106.5108739132027 104.42337996724299 101.4410245093143 96.469662510033174 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 86.936651387315095 2.244852347745208 2.2708943601541289 2.293906780251207 2.3214952873432568 2.3534761957554662 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721 2.3651754688259721Angular Distance
Linear Velocity (cm/yr)
Plate Linear Velocity vs. Angular Distance between Pole and Point
56.182777874420751 60.381921606382917 70.398401002301313 76.369369476136868 81.425956434919684 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 105.7108933978846 2.2634784310236529 2.3684272641941591 2.5665158183402719 2.6476676932738621 2.6939521679045391 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631 2.6226171813898631Angular Distance
Linear Velocity (cm/yr)
Geoscience 397 Lab3 Mizuha Kikuiri
Part1
�i
a
�j
Table1 shows the observation for the relevant plate boundary segments.
log/lat
(
°
)
A
ge
(m.year)
W
idth
(km)
A
ngle
(
°
)
-
25/55
46.264
888.889
43
-
28/51
46.264
861.111
43
-
29/41
46.264
944.44
0
-
29/35
46.264
1083.33
0
-
30
/
30
46.264
1138.89
0
Table1: Observation of the plate boundary
At latitude/longitude of
-
29/41
,
-
29/35
,
-
30
/3
0 we observed plate spreading
parallel to longitude so that is why azimuth is shown as 0
°
.
(b) Table2~5 shows results of using Vel_Azimuth.
Table2: Vel_Azimuth using NUVEL1A for EU/NA
Geoscience 397 Lab3 Mizuha Kikuiri
Part1
(a)Table1 shows the observation for the relevant plate boundary segments.
log/lat(°) Age(m.year) Width(km) Angle(°)
-25/55 46.264 888.889 43
-28/51 46.264 861.111 43
-29/41 46.264 944.44 0
-29/35 46.264 1083.33 0
-30/30 46.264 1138.89 0
Table1: Observation of the plate boundary
At latitude/longitude of -29/41,-29/35, -30/30 we observed plate spreading
parallel to longitude so that is why azimuth is shown as 0°.
(b) Table2~5 shows results of using Vel_Azimuth.
Table2: Vel_Azimuth using NUVEL1A for EU/NA