Genre Analysis

ENG101 – Genre Analysis Rubric Criteria 0 (F) (F) (D) (C) (B) (A)

Possible Points 16 0 8 10 12 14 16

Target Audience No

submission.

The work does not

identify the target

audience for most or all

of the documents.

The work does not identify the

target audience for some or all of

the documents and/or

identification may not be

completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work identifies a target

audience for all documents;

however the identification may not

be completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

target audience for all

documents and provides some

supporting evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

target audience for all

documents and provides

relevant supporting evidence.

Possible Points 16 0 8 10 12 14 16

Structure and

Organization

No

submission.

The work does not

identify the organization

and structure for most or

all of the documents.

The work does not identify the

structure and organization for

some or all of the documents

and/or the identification may not

be completely clear or supported

by evidence.

The work identifies the structure

and organization for all documents;

however, the identification may not

be completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

structure and organization for

all documents and provides

some supporting evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

structure and audience for all

documents and provides

relevant supporting evidence.

Possible Points 16 0 8 10 12 14 16

Formatting No

submission.

The work does not

identify the formatting

of most or all of the

documents.

The work does not identify the

formatting of some or all of the

documents and/or the

identification may not be

completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work identifies the formatting

of all documents; however, the

identification may not be

completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

formatting of all documents and

provides some supporting

evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

formatting of all documents and

provides relevant supporting

evidence.

Possible Points 16 0 8 10 12 14 16

Voice (Tone and Style) No

submission.

The work does not

identify the voice (tone

and style) of most or all

of the documents.

The work does not identify the

voice (tone and style) of some or

all of the documents and/or the

identification may not be

completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work identifies the voice (tone

and style) of all documents;

however, the identification may not

be completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

voice (tone and style) of all

documents and provides some

supporting evidence.

The work clearly identifies the

voice (tone and style) of all

documents and provides

relevant supporting evidence.

Possible Points 16 0 8 10 12 14 16

Content No

submission.

The work does not

discuss the relationship

between the content and

presentation of most or

all of the documents.

The work does not discuss the

relationship between the content

and presentation of some or all of

the documents and/or the

discussion may not be completely

clear or supported by evidence.

The work discusses the relationship

between the content and

presentation of all documents;

however, the discussion may not be

completely clear or supported by

evidence.

The work clearly discusses the

relationship between the

content and presentation of all

documents and provides some

supporting evidence.

The work clearly discusses the

relationship between the

content and presentation of all

documents and provides

relevant supporting evidence.

Possible Points 20 0 10 13 15 17 20

Introduction/Reflection No

submission.

The

introduction/reflection

fails to address most or

all of the questions

provided.

The introduction/reflection fails

to address some of the questions

provided and/or the answers are

unclear or superficial. There is

little evidence of reflective

thought.

The introduction/reflection

addresses all of the questions

provided; however, the answers

may be unclear or superficial in

places. There is some evidence of

reflective thought.

The introduction/reflection

addresses all of the questions

provided. The answers are clear

and substantive, demonstrating

reflective thought.

The introduction/reflection

addresses all of the questions

provided. The answers clear

and substantive, demonstrating

a high degree of reflective

thought.

Column Total 0 50 63 75 87 100