thalassemia, biology
Light and shadows in the iron chelation treatment of haematological diseases
Aurelio Maggio
Haematology II with Thalassaemia and Regional Coordination Centre for the Network on Haemoglobinopathies, Hospital ‘V. Cervello’,
Palermo, Italy
Summary
This review outlines the main chelator groups studied to date,
and the evidence for their clinical effectiveness. For each
treatment, the strength of evidence was documented according
to the guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and
the American Heart Association. Three main haematological
diseases were considered as models: thalassaemia major, sickle-
cell disorders and myelodysplasia. Although the data in the
literature do not allow firmly evidence-based conclusions, the
findings suggest that in thalassaemia major: (i) deferoxamine
remains the drug of choice for chelation treatment; (ii) if there
is deferoxamine intolerance or a change of treatment is
suggested, the options are deferiprone or, if the liver iron
concentration is high, deferasirox treatment; and (iii) if the
ferritin level is >2500 lg/l and liver iron concentation is >7 mg/g/dry weight, continuous subcutaneous (s.c.) or intra-
venous (i.v.) deferoxamine, or combined treatment with
deferiprone and deferoxamine is advised. In case of heart
failure, there is currently more solid documentation to support
continuous s.c. or i.v. deferoxamine treatment than combined
treatment with deferiprone and deferoxamine. However, more
recent data in the literature suggest that the latter could be
a satisfactory alternative. Finally, if iron chelation is required
for sickle-cell disorders or myelodysplastic syndromes, the
current data support the use of deferoxamine treatment.
Keywords: thalassaemia, sickle-cell disease, myelodysplasia.
Iron chelators complex with iron to enable it to be removed
from the body in the urine or bile. Chelation treatment aims to
reduce the labile iron pool or labile intracellular iron within
cells, non-transferrin-bound iron outside cells, and iron
overload in the form of ferritin and haemosiderin deposits in
different organs.
This review, addresses the successes and the disappoint-
ments of iron chelation therapy, and describes the effectiveness
of the main chelator groups in transfusion-dependent anae-
mias, including thalassaemia major, sickle-cell anaemia (SCA)
and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
The effectiveness of iron chelation therapy is assessed
according to the principles of evidence-based medicine, using
the levels of evidence-designated in American College of
Cardiology and the American Heart Association guidelines
(Table I) (Ritchie et al, 1995; Klocke et al, 2003). The litera-
ture was searched for all three of these diseases using the Pub
Med (http://www.pubmed.gov) and American Society of
Haematology (ASH) meeting websites. Considering ‘thalas-
saemia’ as an example, relevant trials were identified using the
terms: thalassaemia and desferrioxamine or deferoxamine
(DFO), thalassaemia and deferiprone (L1), thalassaemia and
deferasirox or ICL670. All electronic searches were updated as
of April 2007. All published, randomised, controlled trials were
included in the evaluation, but published cohort studies were
also considered. Abstracts reported at ASH meetings were
reported in the text, but were not considered in the evaluation.
Main chelator groups
Chelators can be divided into three main groups according to
the way they bind iron: bidentate, tridentate and hexadentate
compounds. These differences involve differences in molecular
weight (MW) (Table II), leading to differences in intestinal
absorption. Intestinal absorption is about 95% for bidentate
and tridentate chelators, but is very poor for hexadentate
chelators. The main clinically studied compounds are sum-
marised below. For the other chelators listed in Table II, the
reader may consult other papers (Jackson et al, 1983; Rakba
et al, 1998; Torti et al, 1998; Bergeron et al, 1999; Green et al,
2001; Lovejoy & Richardson, 2002; Kontoghiorghes et al, 2004;
Donovan et al, 2005; Schroeder & Hasinoff, 2005; Alvero et al,
2006).
Bidentate group – deferiprone
Deferiprone was the first orally-active iron chelating drug to be
developed (Kontoghiorghes, 1982, 1993). Three molecules of
Correspondence: Professor Aurelio Maggio, Hospital V. Cervello,
Haematology II with Thalassaemia, Via Trabucco no 180, 90146
Palermo, Italy. E-mail: [email protected] and
review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06666.x
chelator bind one iron atom (3:1 complexes) (Kontoghiorghes,
1982). Absorption is rapid and the drug is mainly excreted in the
urine (>75% in 24 h) (Kontoghiorghes et al, 1990a; Al-Refaie
et al, 1995a). The remaining 20% was not eliminated in the urine
and may be excreted in the faeces (Olivieri et al, 1990). Studies in
rats have shown accumulation mainly in the liver (Hileti et al,
1995), but there may well be differences between rodents and
humans in metabolism of L1. It is suggested that once the drug
reaches the liver, it can follow two metabolic pathways, ending
either in the excretion of the L1-iron complex in the bile, or in
the elimination of an L1-glucuronic acid complex through the
vascular pool. As glucuronidated L1 cannot bind iron, the rate
and the degree of glucuronidation may influence the effective-
ness of L1 (Singh et al, 1992). The effectiveness of an L1 dose
ranged between 3Æ8 and 6Æ8% (Kontoghiorghes et al, 1990a; Al- Refaie et al, 1995a). L1 has received authorisation as a second
line indication by the European Agency for the Evaluation of the
Medicinal Products (EMEA).
Tridentate group – deferasirox
Deferasirox (ICL670) is a tridentate orally-administered iron
chelator (Table II). It is absorbed rapidly, and the plasma half-
life ranges from 11 to 19 h (Nick et al, 2003). In iron-overloaded
rats, treatment with deferasirox caused a continuous decrease in
liver iron over the entire test period. In vivo studies of biliary
excretion suggest a chelation efficiency of 18% (Nick et al, 2003).
The main route of excretion is in the faeces (Nick et al, 2003).
Nephrotoxicity occurred in preclinical trials in rats and
marmosets, but was commonest in animals that were not
heavily iron-loaded (Nick et al, 2003).
The drug has reached the clinical stage. Its use was approved in
the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
in November 2005 and it was licensed by EMEA for use in
Table I. Levels of evidence for individual class assignments according
to the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart
Association (Ritchie et al, 1995; Klocke et al, 2003).
A Data derived from multiple
randomised clinical trials
B Data derived from a single randomised
trial, or from non-randomised studies
C Consensus opinion of expert
Table II. Comparison of chelator properties in preclinical studies and their clinical stage of development.
Groups Compounds
Route of
administration Studies Clinical stage Company
Bidentate (3:1)
MW ¼ 100–250 Da Deferiprone Oral Phase I/II/III Marketed in Europe
(1999) and India (1995)
Apotex (Toronto,
Canada) Cipla
(Mumbai, India)
Hydroxamates Oral Only in 40 Egyptian
patients with TM
Not marketed —-
Catechols Oral Only in eight patients
with TM
Not marketed —-
Tridentate (2:1)
MW � 370 Deferasirox Oral Phase I/II/III Marketed in USA (2005)
licensed in Europe (2006)
Novartis (Basel,
Switzerland)
Deferitrin (GT252–56) Oral Phase I Not marketed Genzyme
(Cambridge,
MA, USA)
Thioesemicarbazones
(Triapine)
Intravenous Phase I/II as
antitumor agent
Not marketed Vion Pharm
(New Haven,
CT, USA)
PIH and Aroylhydrazone
analougues
Oral Only in cell cultures
and rodents
Not marketed —-
Exadentate (1:1)
MW ¼ 400–1000 Da Deferioxamine Subcutaneous,
intravenous
Phase I/II/III Marketed in USA and
Europe (1968)
Novartis
Tachpyr ND Only in cell cultures
and in rodents
—- —-
Hydroxyquinoline Need ‘in vivo’ studies
for oral activity
Only in cell cultures —- —-
Aminocarboxylates
(dexrazoxane)
Intravenous Phase III as cardioprotector
vs. anthracycline
Marketed in USA and
Europe (2004)
Pfizer (New York,
NY, USA),
Chiron
(Emeryville,
CA, USA)
Da, Daltons; MW, molecular weight; ND, not yet determined; PIH, pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone; TM, thalassaemia major.
Review
ª 2007 The Author 408 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
Europe in 2006 (Table II). It is authorised as first-line therapy in
patients with thalassaemia major aged >6 years, and as second-
line therapy in other chronic iron-overload conditions, and in
patients aged 2–5 years.
Hexadentate group – deferoxamine
Deferoxamine is effective in clinical use (Table II), although
the gastro-intestinal absorption of DFO is poor because of its
high MW. It is infused subcutaneously (s.c.) 5–7 times a week
for 8–12 h, usually overnight. The advised daily dose is 20 mg/
kg/d in children and 40–60 mg/kg/d in adults (Hershko et al,
1998). Intensive intravenous (i.v.) DFO treatment has been
used at 40–60 mg/kg/d in severely iron overloaded patients
(Davis & Porter, 2000). However, it is noteworthy to consider
that these recommended dosages are an oversimplification,
because they are varied according to the degree of iron
overload. The iron chelate is mainly excreted in the urine as
ferrioxamine, but biliary excretion may predominate at high
doses (Propper et al, 1976; Pippard et al, 1982).
Effectiveness of chelation treatments
Thalassaemia major
Deferoxamine treatment
Control of body iron burden Eight trials were considered: one
compared DFO with placebo and included a report with a
follow-up on the same trial (Barry et al, 1974; Modell et al,
1982), five studies compared DFO with L1 (Olivieri et al, 1990;
Maggio et al, 2002; Mourad et al, 2003; Gomber et al, 2004;
Olivieri & Brittenham 1997) and two compared different
schedules of DFO (Graziano et al, 1978; Borgna-Pignatti &
Cohen, 1997). However, few trials measured the same
outcomes. When DFO was compared with L1 or a different
DFO schedule, no statistically significant differences in effects
on iron overload were observed.
Conclusion: the high effectiveness of DFO in controlling
body iron burden has been demonstrated in multiple rand-
omised clinical trials (Level of evidence: A).
Side-effects The main side-effects of DFO, local skin reaction,
hyper-sensitivity, oto- and ophthalmic-toxicity, skeletal
impairment and infection with Yersinia enterocolitica, have
been described extensively (Orton et al, 1985; Olivieri et al,
1986; Dickeroff, 1987; De Virgiliis et al, 1988; Giardina et al,
1993; Rodda et al, 1995). Anaphylaxis, pulmonary fibrosis and
renal impairment have been reported less frequently (Bousquet
et al, 1983; Freedman et al, 1990; Koren et al, 1991). These
side-effects are generally agreed to be dose related (Porter &
Davies, 2002). Episodes of neutropenia have also been
described in patients receiving only DFO (Origa & Galanello,
2004; U. Bertola, M. Collel and A. Piga, unpublished
observations).
Conclusion: several side effects of DFO, mainly dose related,
were reported in mainly non-randomised clinical trials (Level
of evidence: B).
Endocrine complications Large retrospective and prospective
studies suggest that DFO treatment has some effect in
preventing endocrinopathy (Kruger et al, 1986; Brittenham
et al, 1994; Italian Working Group on Endocrine
Complications in Non-endocrine Diseases, 1995; Gamberini
et al, 1998, 2004; Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2004; Cunningham
et al, 2004), and the prevalence of insulin dependent diabetes,
hypogonadism and hypothyroidism has been lower in the last
decade, in comparison with earlier reports (Brittenham et al,
1994; Italian Working Group on Endocrine Complications in
Non-endocrine Diseases, 1995; Gamberini et al, 1998, 2004;
Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2004; Cunningham et al, 2004). There
are no sufficiently large prospective clinical trials in the
literature to show whether, DFO treatment alone is able to
reverse-established endocrinopathy.
Conclusion: some effectiveness of DFO in preventing
endocrinological complications has been reported in non-
randomised clinical trials (Level of evidence: B).
Cardiac complications It has been shown in retrospective and
prospective clinical studies (Table III), that intensified DFO
treatment by either s.c. or i.v. route can reverse cardiac
dysfunction because of iron overload, and increase survival in
thalassaemia-major patients with early or overt cardio-
myopathy (Davis & Porter, 2000; Miskin et al, 2003; Davis
et al, 2004). In these patients, improvement of the left
ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was associated with a
progressive increase in myocardial T2* (star) signal (Anderson
et al, 2004). Finally, a serum ferritin level consistently, above
2500 lg/l is associated with a high prevalence (75%) of cardiac disease (Olivieri et al, 1994), and lower ferritin levels
(£1000 lg/l) are associated with lower probability of heart failure (Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2004).
Conclusion: non-randomised clinical trials (Level of evi-
dence: B) suggested effectiveness of DFO in: (i) reversing heart
failure and cardiomyopathy progression; (ii) reducing heart
iron; and (iii) improving LVEF.
Effect on survival Two retrospective studies of patients with
thalassaemia-major treated by DFO reported an increased
survival for the most recent cohorts (Zurlo et al, 1989;
Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2004). The major variables associated
with prolonged survival were female sex (P < 0Æ01) and lower ferritin levels (£1000 lg/l). Recently, after a 15-year prospective study, in patients chelated with DFO, Efthimidias et al (2006)
suggested that left ventricular restrictive filling pattern measured
by echo-Doppler is an important predictor of cardiac mortality.
Data from the UK thalassaemia register, which covers the whole
country, showed poorer survival than that reported from
specialist centres (Modell et al, 2000). This was attributed to
non-adherence to the burdensome iron chelation regimen with
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 409
DFO, particularly, where the patients were cared for at general
hospitals with less of experience of the disease.
A study from Hong Kong showed an 87Æ6% probability of survival beyond the age of 20 years (Li et al, 2002). A number
of factors may coincide to produce disappointing results, such
as late start of DFO chelation treatment (the median age of
starting in the three cohorts studied was 5 years), the small
number of patients, poor treatment compliance, and the
inclusion of deaths from bone marrow transplantation.
Conclusion: non-randomised clinical trials (Level of evi-
dence: B) suggest the effectiveness of DFO in improving survival.
Deferiprone treatment
Control of body iron burden A meta-analysis (Addis et al, 1999)
showed that 51Æ8% of the patients receiving 75 mg/kg/d or more of L1 achieved negative iron balance. In three
randomised clinical trials (Olivieri et al, 1990; Olivieri &
Brittenham, 1997; Maggio et al, 2002) that compared
treatment with DFO and L1 for measures of iron overload,
there was no difference observed after 12 months of treatment
in ferritin levels, urinary iron excretion (UIE) or liver iron
concentration (LIC). Compliance was addressed in two of these
trials, and was found to be better in the L1 group than the DFO
group (P < 0Æ005) in one (Olivieri & Brittenham, 1997). In 1997, 532 thalassaemia patients from 86 different centres
were enrolled in a 3-year programme of the Italian Ministry of
Health for the controlled distribution of L1 (Ceci et al, 2002).
This study showed that 75 mg/kg/d of L1 was effective in
controlling body iron load, as determined by serum ferritin
levels.
Conclusion: these findings, derived from multiple random-
ised clinical trials (Level of evidence: A), suggest that, after
short-term treatment, L1 is as efficacious as DFO in controlling
iron load.
Main side effects There is a variable incidence of gastro-
intestinal symptoms and transient hypertransaminasaemia (Al-
Refaie et al, 1995b; Taher et al, 1997; Hoffbrand et al, 1998;
Cohen et al, 2000; Maggio et al, 2002). Arthropathy and/or
arthralgia are common, with an incidence of 3–38Æ5% (Agarwal et al, 1995; Cohen et al, 2000; Ceci et al, 2002;
Maggio et al, 2002). An increased incidence was observed in
patients with high ferritin levels and in those taking high doses
of L1 (Agarwal et al, 1995). Arthropathy, usually resolves
following a reduction in dose or temporary cessation of the
drug. There are occasional reports of zinc deficiency (Al-Refaie
et al, 1994; Hoffbrand et al, 1998) particularly in patients with
diabetes (Al-Refaie et al, 1994): this requires oral
administration of zinc. The most important side-effects are
neutropenia and agranulocytosis, and constant monitoring of
the white cell count is required during L1 treatment. The
reported incidence of neutropenia was from 2Æ1 to 5Æ4/100 patient-years, and the incidence of agranulocytosis ranges from
0Æ4 to 0Æ6/100 patient-years (Cohen et al, 2000; Ceci et al, 2002). The cause of agranulocytosis and neutropenia is
unknown. Rechallenge with L1 is associated with higher risk
of agranulocytosis or neutropenia (Ceci et al, 2002). A
reported increase in liver fibrosis (Olivieri et al, 1998) was
not confirmed in subsequent reports (Callea, 1998; Töndury
et al, 1998; R. Galanello, S. De Virgiliis and A. Agus,
unpublished observations; Stella et al, 1998; Maggio et al,
2002; Wanless et al, 2002).
Conclusion: non-randomised clinical trials (Level of evi-
dence: B) reported a variable incidence of side effects, mostly
transitory. The most severe side effect is agranulocytosis,
requiring careful monitoring.
Endocrinological complications: There is one published
prospective non-randomised clinical study comparing L1
with DFO in the prevention of major endocrinopathies in 47
beta-thalassaemia-major patients (Wang et al, 2006), all
previously treated with DFO. These patients were divided
into two groups, one of which received L1 and the other
continued DFO treatment. They were evaluated for the
incidence of new endocrinopathies, defined as growth
hormone insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, or gonadal
dysfunction over a period of 41Æ9 ± 17Æ7 months. The results suggest that there were no statistically-significant
differences in the incidence of endocrinopathies between the
groups. The limitations of this study were: small number of
patients, the possible risk of endocrinological damage during
prior chelation treatment and the relatively short-period of
study.
Table III. Comparison of effectiveness in car-
diac iron loading between deferoxamine (DFO)
versus DFO + L1 treatment.
DFO DFO + L1
No. of studies Evidence No. of studies Evidence
Reversal of heart failure 3 B 4* C
Heart iron 1 B 1 B
Progression of cardiomyopathy 2 B NT –
Improvement in LVEF (%)� or SF (%) 3 B 2 B
*An abstract on the reversal of heart failure with combined treatment was presented at ASH 2006
(Lai et al, 2006).
�Improvement was considered only where baseline values of LVEF were <55%. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT, no trials; SF, shortening fraction.
Review
ª 2007 The Author 410 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
Conclusion: the effectiveness of L1 treatment in preventing
endocrinological complications has been reported in only one
non-randomised clinical trial (Level of evidence: B), and for
this reason, it has to be considered less documented in
comparison with DFO.
Cardiac complications Two retrospective clinical trials
(Anderson et al, 2002; Pepe et al, 2006) and one propective
randomised trial (Pennell et al, 2006) suggest that the ability of
L1 to remove iron is organ-specific, with greatest efficacy for the
heart as determined by variation in the cardiac T2* signal.
Moreover, in both the retrospective and the prospective
randomised trials the value of the cardiac T2* signal was
higher in the L1 than in the DFO-treated group (Anderson et al,
2002; Pennell et al, 2006; Pepe et al, 2006). After 1 year of
treatment in the randomised trial the L1-treated patients had a
greater increase in EF (3Æ1 ± 3Æ6%) than the DFO-treated patients (0Æ32 ± 3Æ4) (Pennell et al, 2006). However, these studies had some limitations. The L1 dosage (92 mg/kg) in the
randomised prospective clinical trial (Pennell et al, 2006) was
higher than that suggested by the manufacturer (75 mg/kg).
Secondly, the 3Æ1 ± 3Æ6% improvement in the EF (Pennell et al, 2006) was shown in subjects with normal baseline values and
may be without any clinical and cardiological significance.
Moreover, no change in EF was found in a very similar study
(Pepe et al, 2006). Thirdly, the clinical significance in terms of
heart iron removal, as indicated by the 1Æ5 ms increase in the myocardial signal (Pennell et al, 2006), is doubtful when
interpreted in the light of the cardiac iron concentration curve
in a gerbil model (Wood et al, 2005). Finally, the correlation
between the myocardial T2* signal and cardiac function for
wider T2* signal range is controversial (Anderson et al, 2002;
Pepe et al, 2006). An indirect suggestion about L1 heart-
specificity comes from two retrospective clinical studies (Piga
et al, 2003; Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2006), which found a higher
prevalence of cardiomyopathy progression in the DFO-group.
The limits of these studies may be: (i) different definitions of
progressive cardiomyopathy (an increase in New York Heart
Association (NYHA) class for Piga et al, 2003 and heart failure or
arrhythmia requiring treatment for Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2006);
(ii) a large number of patients in NYHA class I were considered
to have progression of cardiomyopathy (13/15) (Piga et al,
2003), a class not considered pathological (Dolgin, 1994); and
(iii) the lack of reference to major cardiac events (death or
hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes). Moreover, in the
studies of Ceci et al (2002) and Hoffbrand et al (1998), nine and
three patients respectively, died from heart failure during L1
treatment. Finally, to date, there are no papers in the literature
showing the ability of L1 administration alone to reverse heart
failure.
Conclusion: with a Level of evidence B, clinical trials with L1
suggest: (i) some effect on delaying progression of cardio-
myopathy; (ii) ability to reduce heart iron; (iii) mild improve-
ment of LVEF in subjects with normal values at baseline;
(iv) absence of data on the ability to reverse heart failure.
Effect on survival Because L1 was only recently marketed in
India (1995) and in Europe (1999), survival data for patients
treated from the outset with L1 alone are not available. So far,
all L1-treated patients who have been evaluated for the effect
on survival received prior therapy with DFO.
The main publications include two retrospective and two
prospective non-randomised clinical trials describing mortality
because of cardiac damage in patients treated with DFO and L1
(Hoffbrand et al, 1998; Ceci et al, 2002; Piga et al, 2003;
Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2006). The results of these studies are
summarised in Table IV.
However, these studies have some limitations (Table IV): (i)
the period of observation was quite different between studies;
(ii) within the same clinical study, there was a significant
difference in observation time between the L1 and DFO-
treated groups (Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2006); (iii) the age at
initial chelation treatment was not reported in one study
(Borgna-Pignatti et al, 2006) and in the other age was higher in
DFO- than in L1-treated patients (Piga et al, 2003); and (iv)
there are some discrepancies concerning the number of deaths
from heart failure and the onset of cardiomyopathy between
the studies of Ceci et al (2002) and Borgna-Pignatti et al
(2006) (Table IV). Recently, Ceci et al (2006) showed, in a
multicentre case-control study, that good compliance and L1
are protective against mortality.
Conclusion: these findings suggest (Level of evidence B) that
L1 probably has some effect on survival but, because of its
recent marketing and the limits of the reported studies, its
effect is less well documented than that of DFO.
Alternating or sequential deferoxamine and deferiprone treatment
Control of body iron burden An early report of the use of this
kind of treatment was reported by Aydinok et al (1999) who
performed a small non-controlled clinical study on seven
thalassaemic children. The results suggested a significant
reduction (P ¼ 0Æ03) in LIC at the 6th month of sequential therapy. In a prospective, randomised, controlled trial on the
safety and efficacy of alternating DFO (2 d/week) and L1 (5 d/
week) vs. DFO (5–7 d/week), Galanello et al (2006) did not find
any statistically significant difference between the two treatment
arms. However, in this trial the authors did not document
power calculations to define the number of patients that should
have been enrolled to find a possible statistically significant
difference between the two arms. A multicentre, randomised
sequential or alternating clinical trial comparing L1 vs. L1 (4 d/
week) and DFO (3 d/week) is ongoing (Maggio et al, 2004).
Conclusion: the single randomised controlled trial (Level of
evidence: B) suggests that alternating or sequential treatment is
not more efficacious than DFO alone in controlling body iron
burden.
Main side effects Adverse drug reactions were more common
in alternating treatment (24%) vs. DFO alone (7%), although
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 411
T a
b le
IV .
M o
rt al
it y
an d
d ef
er ip
ro n
e tr
ea tm
en t.
T y p
e o
f st
u d
y
N o
. o
f p
at ie
n ts
A g
e, y ea
rs
(± S
D )
A g
e at
st ar
t o
f
ch el
at io
n
tr ea
tm en
t
(y ea
rs )
A g
e at
st ar
t
o f
ch el
at io
n
tr ea
tm en
t
in th
e th
re e
p at
ie n
ts w
h o
d ie
d (y
ea rs
)
A g e
at
d ea
th
(y ea
rs )
D efi
n it
io n
o f
ca rd
io m
y o
p at
h y
P ro
g re
ss io
n o
f
ca rd
io m
y o
p at
h y
D ea
th fr
o m
ca rd
io m
y o
p at
h y
T o
ta l
d ea
th s
R ef
er en
ce s
L 1
D F
O L
1 D
F O
L 1
D F
O L
1 D
F O
L 1
D F
O
R et
ro sp
ec ti
v e
5 4
7 5
1 7
(± 4
) 1
9 (±
7 )
4 Æ5
(± 3
) 6 Æ8
(± 4 Æ7
) 1
3
8 N R
2 6
2 3
2 3
N Y
H A
1 3
in cl
as s
1
O n
e in
cl as
s 2
O n
e fr
o m
cl as
s 1
– 3
2 /4
7 in
L 1
1 3
/6 3
in D
F O
0 3
– 3
P ig
a et
a l
(2 0
0 3
) P
< 0 Æ0
5 P
< 0 Æ0
5
R et
ro sp
ec ti
v e
(p at
ie n
t- y ea
rs )
1 5
7 (7
5 0
) 3
5 9
(3 6
1 0
) 1
7 Æ5
1 7 Æ4
– –
– H
ea rt
fa il
u re
A rr
h y th
m ia
n ee
d in
g
tr ea
tm en
t
L 1
: 0
D F
O :
5 2
(0 Æ6
> 3 Æ4
)
1 9
9 5
> 2
0 0
3
0 1
5 (H
ea rt
fa il
u re
o r
ar rh
y th
m ia
s)
2 2
4 B
o rg
n a-
P ig
n at
ti
et a
l (2
0 0
6 )
P ro
sp ec
ti v e
n o
t
ra n
d o
m is
ed
5 1
– 3
0 Æ5
– –
– H
ea rt
fa il
u re
– 4
(o n
e w
it h
C S
A )
– 5
– H
o ff
b ra
n d
et a
l
(1 9
9 8
)
P ro
sp ec
ti v e
n o
t
ra n
d o
m is
ed
5 3
2 –
– –
– –
– –
– –
9 *
– 1
1 –
C ec
i et
a l
(2 0
0 2
)
*I n
th e
C ec
i et
a l
(2 0
0 2
) st
u d
y ,
n in
e su
b je
ct s
w h
o d
ie d
o f
h ea
rt fa
il u
re h
av e
b ee
n re
p o
rt ed
b u
t th
e in
it ia
ti o
n o
f ca
rd ia
c d
is ea
se w
as n
o t
d es
cr ib
ed .
In th
e B
o rg
n a-
P ig
n at
ti et
a l
(2 0
0 6
) st
u d
y ,
ei g
h t
p at
ie n
ts
w h
o d
ie d
fr o
m a
ca rd
ia c
ev en
t w
er e
re fe
rr ed
fr o
m C
ec i
et a
l (2
0 0
2 ).
A p
er so
n al
w ri
tt en
co m
m u
n ic
at io
n (J
u ly
2 0
0 5
) b
y A
. C
ec i
in d
ic at
es th
at al
l th
es e
p at
ie n
ts h
ad ca
rd ia
c d
is ea
se at
th e
in it
ia ti
o n
o f
L 1
tr ea
tm en
t.
C S
A ,
co n
g en
it al
si d
er o
b la
st ic
an ae
m ia
; N
R ,
n o
t re
p o
rt ed
; N
Y H
A ,
N ew
Y o
rk H
ea rt
A ss
o ci
at io
n (D
o lg
in ,
1 9
9 4
); –
, n
o d
at a.
Review
ª 2007 The Author 412 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
the majority of these were mild/moderate and occurred
within the first weeks of therapy (Aydinok et al, 1999;
Galanello et al, 2006). Two episodes of neutropenia were
described in the randomised trial during DFO treatment
(Galanello et al, 2006), while no episodes of agranulocytosis
were reported.
Conclusion: the main difference between sequential treat-
ment and L1 treatment alone was the absence of reported
agranulocytosis (Level of evidence: B). However, other large
clinical trials are necessary to confirm this finding. No
clinical studies have yet been published on the control of
complications, organ specificity and effect on survival
control.
Combined deferoxamine and deferiprone treatment
Control of body iron burden The first study showing success
with combined or associated treatment in five patients with
thalassaemia major was reported by Wonke et al (1998).
Subsequently three large prospective and two small, single
centre, randomised clinical trials addressed this issue in detail.
However, because of several limitations (number of patients,
missing data, short-period of treatment, etc.), the data from
the two randomised clinical trials must be interpreted with
caution and they were not included in the final evaluation
(Mourad et al, 2003; Gomber et al, 2004). In three prospective
clinical trials (Origa et al, 2005; Daar & Pathare, 2006;
Kattamis et al, 2006), in which, patients were treated for at
least 12 months, the serum ferritin levels fell dramatically. In
one prospective study, UIE was double that with DFO or L1
alone (P £ 0Æ01) (Origa et al, 2005). Similar results were reported by Athanassiou-Metaxa et al (2004). Two prospective
clinical trials (Daar & Pathare, 2006; Kattamis et al, 2006)
suggested that about 70% of subjects were compliant with
DFO.
Conclusion: non-randomised clinical trials (Level of evi-
dence: B) suggest good control of body iron burden using
combined DFO and L1 treatment.
Main side effects Four studies addressed major side effects in
patients with thalassaemia major receiving combined
treatment (Mourad et al, 2003; Origa et al, 2005; Daar &
Pathare, 2006; Kattamis et al, 2006). The incidence of
neutropenia, reported only in one publication (Origa et al,
2005) was 8Æ8%, while, the incidence of agranulocytosis (Mourad et al, 2003; Origa et al, 2005; Daar & Pathare,
2006; Kattamis et al, 2006) was from 2Æ2 to 4Æ2%, higher than that reported for L1 alone (Cohen et al, 2000; Ceci et al, 2002).
Another side effect was zinc deficiency (Origa et al, 2005),
normalised by zinc sulphate supplementation (Galanello et al,
2006).
Conclusion: non-randomised clinical trials (Level of evi-
dence: B) clearly suggest that, in combined DFO and L1
treatment, the incidence of agranulocytosis was higher in
comparison to that reported using L1 alone.
Control of complications and organ specificity
Endocrinological complications Platis et al (2004) reported the
effect of combined treatment in a small population of
thalassaemia-major patients with glucose metabolism
disturbances (GMD), diabetes mellitus, or impaired glucose
tolerance. There was an improvement of GMD in 1/3 cases
after 24–36 months of treatment. Recently, Farmaki et al
(2006) confirmed that combination treatment results in an
overall improvement in glucose metabolism.
Conclusion: some effect in reversing GMD has been reported
in combined DFO and L1 treatment (Level of evidence: B).
Cardiac complications A significant improvement of the LVEF
and the shortening fraction (SF) in comparison with the low
values at baseline were reported in two papers (Origa et al,
2005; Kattamis et al, 2006). Recently, an abstract and later, a
paper on a randomised placebo-controlled, double blind trial,
suggested that combined treatment is superior to DFO and
placebo in removing myocardial iron in thalassaemia-major
patients (Tanner et al, 2005, 2007). However, there are no
large retrospective or prospective clinical studies suggesting an
effect on the reversal of heart failure in patients with initial or
overt cardiomyopathy, except a single abstract presented at the
2006 ASH meeting (Lai et al, 2006). At the time of submitting
this review, there were five case reports suggesting the efficacy
of combined treatment in reversing heart failure because of
iron overload in patients with thalassaemia major (Wu et al,
2004; Tsironi et al, 2005a,b; Porcu et al, 2006; Tavecchia et al,
2006). In addition, reversal of heart failure was observed in a
patient with a severe type of juvenile hemochromatosis
(Daraio et al, 2005; Fabio et al, 2007).
Conclusion: trials using combination treatment suggest: (i)
the possibility of reversing heart failure (Level of evidence: C);
(ii) the possibility of removing myocardial iron (Level of
evidence: B); (iii) the ability to improve LVEF (Level of
evidence: B). Preliminary, but not evaluable data also suggest
some efficacy of the treatment in controlling progression of
cardiomyopathy.
Effect on survival As with treatment with L1 alone, no survival
curves are available for patients treated from the outset with
combined treatment. A group of 125/539 patients with
thalassaemia major, born in Cyprus after 1960 and starting
combination treatment in 1999 have been evaluated (Telfer
et al, 2006) using both a univariate (OR 0Æ39, 95% CI ¼ 0Æ19– 0Æ81, P ¼ <0Æ01) and multivariate analysis (OR 0Æ44, 95% CI ¼ 0Æ20–0Æ99; P £ 0Æ05). A protective effect was found for follow-up after the year 2000 (Telfer et al, 2006). Moreover,
there were no cardiac deaths in the patients who switched to
combination chelation treatment (Telfer et al, 2006).
Conclusion: there is only one published study, reporting
some effect of combination treatment on survival (Level of
evidence: B). For this reason, this effect must be considered less
documented in comparison with DFO alone.
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 413
Deferasirox treatment
Control of body iron burden Recently, two randomised
multicentre clinical trials addressed the effect of deferasirox
on body iron burden (Cappellini et al, 2006; Piga et al, 2006).
The first trial, which evaluated drug effectiveness (Cappellini
et al, 2006) involved 586 thalassaemia-major patients, 296
receiving deferasirox and 290 receiving DFO, aged 2 years or
older. The primary response criterion was defined as the
maintenance or reduction of LIC measured by liver biopsy or
superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID).
However, because a validation sub-study suggested that LIC
determined by SQUID was not fully reliable, only LIC
measured by liver biopsy was considered for final evaluation
of the study (Cappellini et al, 2006).
The authors concluded that the primary endpoint was not
obtained in the overall population (Cappellini et al, 2006), and
that this could be because proportionally lower doses of
deferasirox relative to DFO were administered to patients with
LIC levels <7 mg Fe/g dry weight. However, subjects with LIC
values of 7 mg Fe/g dry weight or higher had significant and
similar dose-dependent reductions in LIC and serum ferritin
(Cappellini et al, 2006). Another recent randomised phase II
trial reported similar results for patients with a LIC >7 mg/Fe/
g dry weight (Piga et al, 2006). However, this study also
measured LIC by SQUID. Both trials suggest that deferasirox is
as effective as DFO in patients with LIC values of 7 mg Fe/g/
dry weight or higher and at dosage of 20 mg/kg/d. No data on
compliance was reported in these studies.
In conclusion, further studies are necessary to show whether,
higher doses of deferasirox (>10 mg/kg) can control iron
overloading in patients with low or medium LIC (£7 mg Fe/g/ dry weight) with acceptable side effects. These are in progress.
Conclusion: the effectiveness of Deferasirox in controlling
body iron burden was good only for patients with LIC >7 mg/
g/dry weight, and it was shown (Level of evidence A).
Main side effects Dose adjustments, dose interruptions and
discontinuations were similar in the deferasirox and DFO
treatment groups (Cappellini et al, 2006) and gastro-intestinal
events and skin rash appeared in 15Æ2% and 10Æ8% of patients respectively. Mild, dose-dependent and sometimes transitory
increases of creatinine were observed in 38% of cases and dose
reduction was necessary in 13% (Cappellini et al, 2006). Two
patients developed alanine transaminase levels that were
greater than twice the normal range, and sensorineural
deafness and hypoacusis were more common in the DFO
(n ¼ 5) than in the deferasirox (n ¼ 1) group. Cataracts or lenticular opacities were considered related to the study drug
in one patient on deferasirox and four patient on DFO. Drug-
related agranulocytosis was not observed during this trial, and
no changes in zinc and copper levels were found at the end of
the study (Cappellini et al, 2006). Recently, Piga et al, (2006)
reported, in a phase II trial, that no patient discontinued
deferasirox because of drug-related adverse events, although
the frequency of mild to moderate gastro-intestinal
disturbances was higher in the deferasirox group than with
DFO (Piga et al, 2006). A recent postmarketing update by
Novartis reported cases of acute renal failure with a fatal
outcome particularly in patients with preexisting renal
conditions (http://www.drugs.com/pro/exjade.html). More-
over, postmarketing reports of neutropenia, agranulocytosis
and thrombocytopenia, prevalently in patients with
haematological disorders, were described.
Conclusion: a variable incidence of side-effects was shown
by these studies (Level of evidence: A) with postmarketing
reports of cases of acute renal failure and cytopenias.
Control of complications and organ specificity Except for an
abstract (Porter et al, 2005), there are so far no published
studies on this issue and for this reason, it is too early to know
the effect of deferasirox on the heart (Neufeld, 2006).
Effect on survival There are no published data on survival
using treatment with deferasirox.
Sickle-cell disease
Deferoxiamine treatment
Control of body iron burden Studies using DFO in patients with
SCD suggested a degree of iron excretion similar to that in
thalassaemia major patients. In two small studies (Cohen &
Schwartz, 1978, 1979), UIE after DFO administration was
28Æ7 mg/24 h and 24Æ3 mg/24 h respectively. The only randomised, double-blind study was aimed at the dose-
response relationship (Silliman et al, 1993). The most
limiting factor in DFO treatment is compliance, especially in
patients who start chelation treatment later in life, as is usually
case with SCD. Recently, the neurocognitive status of children
with SCD was considered a high risk factor for non-adherence
with home DFO administration (Treadwell et al, 2005). All
these data, weakly suggest that DFO could control iron burden
in SCD-transfused patients.
Conclusion: some effectiveness of DFO in controlling body
iron burden in SCD is documented, although it is based on a
lower grade of evidence than in thalassaemia major (Level of
evidence: B).
Main side effects No specific trials addressing this issue are
available. The main side effects of DFO in patients with SCD
are likely to be the same as those reported in thalassaemia
major. However, attention should be given to the risk of some
side effects peculiar to SCD e.g. (i) ocular toxicity (SCD can
damage endothelium and cause vasculopathy); (ii) high
frequency of sensorineural hearing loss (SCD patients can
have ischaemic events); (iii) pulmonary toxicity (SCD patients
can have acute chest syndrome); and (iv) zinc deficiency (SCD
patients can have zinc deficiency).
Review
ª 2007 The Author 414 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
Control of complications and organ specificity Gonadal
dysfunction and liver damage seems to be less severe in
patients with SCD (P. Harmatz, E. Butensky, E. Fung, L. Louie,
E. Theil and L. Ferrell, unpublished observations). Moreover,
Wood et al (2004), reported neither cardiac dysfunction nor
very low T2* myocardial signal in SCD patients. However, this
study had two limitations: (i) the small number of SCD
patients receiving transfusions for 13 years or longer; and (ii) a
long-time interval between the liver biopsy and T2*
myocardial determination (Wood et al, 2004). In contrast, a
preliminary report on 205 subjects with SCD showed cardiac
dysfunction, defined as a shortening function (SF) <28% or
LVEF <55%, was at the same frequency as that found in a
group of 146 patients with thalassaemia major (Fung et al,
2004). Recently, Fung et al (2007) found that transfused SCD
patients who died began transfusion and chelation therapy
later compared with those who survived.
Conclusion: there is a lack of data on the control of
complications and organ specificity of DFO in SCD.
Deferiprone treatment
Control of body iron burden and main side effects Three small
clinical trials addressed this issue. The first report, by Collins
et al (1994), suggested that the mean total daily iron excretion
during L1 treatment was sufficient to maintain net negative
iron balance in transfused patients with SCD. Hoffbrand et al
(1998), reported no differences in efficacy and side-effects
between SCD and thalassaemia-major patients. Voskaridou
et al (2005) reported 15 patients with serum ferritin levels
from 754 to 7620 lg/l, evaluated at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. Ferritin levels decreased significantly
by the end of the trial in 10/12 patients who completed the
study (P ¼ 0Æ0056). The drug was well tolerated and agranulocytosis was not reported. Although these data must
be considered as preliminary, they suggest that L1 could safely
control iron burden in SCD patients.
Conclusion: some effectiveness of L1 in controlling body
iron burden in SCD patients was shown with a Level of
evidence: B in small clinical trials. No agranulocytosis was
described.
Deferasirox treatment
Control of body iron burden and main side effects A recent
abstract and paper on the treatment of iron overload with
deferasirox in SCD patients (Vichinsky et al, 2005; Vichinsky
et al, 2007) reported a phase II study over a 1-year period.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the
safety and tolerability of deferasirox in comparison with
DFO (Vichinsky et al, 2005; Vichinsky et al, 2007). The
commonest adverse events associated with deferasirox were
generally mild. Mild non-progressive increases in serum
creatinine >33% of baseline and above the upper limit of
normal were observed in three patients receiving deferasirox.
Discontinuation rates from deferasirox (11Æ4%) and DFO (11Æ1%) were similar. Concerning effectiveness, a dose-effect relationship was observed and most patients assigned to
receive deferasirox doses of 30 mg/kg and DFO ‡50 mg/kg had an absolute change in serum ferritin. However,
clinical phase III trials, aimed at determining the real
effectiveness of this drug in SCD patients with iron overload
are necessary.
Conclusion: deferasirox at doses of 30 mg/kg seems to have
similar efficacy to DFO in controlling body iron burden in
SCD but this is so far documented only in a single phase II
study (Level of evidence: B).
Hydroxycarbamide and chelation treatments Ad interim
analysis of a multicentre, randomised, clinical trial
comparing L1 (75 mg/kg) vs. DFO (50 mg/kg) in SCD
patients (Maggio et al, 2005) reported that final ferritin
levels during chelation (DFO or L1) and HC (also known as
hydroxyurea) treatment (13–14 mg/kg) was significantly lower
in patients treated with HC compared with non-HC treated
patients (P £ 0Æ05). In addition, a significant reduction of final ferritin levels occurred in patients treated with L1 and HC
(Maggio et al, 2005). No cases of agranulocytosis or
neutropenia were observed in subjects simultaneously treated
with HC. The lower ferritin levels in HC-treated patients could
be related to reduction of erythron mass and consequently less
gastro-intestinal iron absorption (Maggio et al, 2005). No
studies on the use of deferasirox and hydroxyurea are currently
reported.
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Deferioxamine treatment
Control of body iron burden Evidence on the efficacy of iron
chelation therapy on iron overload in MDS patients was
reported in six-uncontrolled studies (Muntean et al, 1989;
Kontoghiorghes et al, 1990b; Jensen et al, 1992; Kobayashi
et al, 1996; Del Rio Garma et al, 1997; Borgna-Pignatti et al,
1998). Serum ferritin concentration decreased in 10/14
(71Æ4%) DFO-treated patients but increased in 2 and remained stable in 1. Iron chelation was found to decrease
blood transfusion requirements in 7/11 (64%) cases (Jensen
et al, 1992; Hemsen et al, 1996). However, this finding
should be confirmed in a phase III clinical trial.
The Italian Society of Haematology (ISH) recently published
consensus-based practice guidelines for the treatment of
primary MDS (Alessandrino et al, 2002): iron chelation
treatment is advised for in patients with a life span longer
than 6 months who have received more than 50 units of red
blood cells. The consensus statement on iron overload in MDS
(Gattermann et al, 2005) recommended that chelation treat-
ment should start when ferritin levels reach 1000–3000 lg/l and should be continued as long as iron overload remains
clinically relevant. UK-based medical experts in the clinical
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 415
management of MDS and a representative from a District
General Hospital performed guidelines for the diagnosis and
therapy of adult MDS reviewed by the Sounding Board and by
the Committee of the British Committee for Standards in
Haematology (Bowen et al, 2003). The UK recommendations
for iron chelation in MDS are very similar to those from the
ISH, except that they suggested that treatment should be
started after approximately 25 units of red cells (Bowen et al,
2003). Moreover, according to the UK guidelines, the use of
twice daily subcutaneous bolus injections of DFO may be
considered where infusions are not tolerated, while the
addition of a single dose of DFO at each transfusion episode
was not considered to have any scientific basis (Bowen et al,
2003).
Conclusion: some effectiveness of DFO in controlling body
iron burden in MDS is documented (Level of evidence: B).
Deferiprone treatment
Control of body iron burden Kontoghiorghes et al (1990b)
reported no overall change of serum ferritin over a period of
up to 15 months in 2/6 patients with MDS. Kersten et al (1996),
in a 10 month prospective trial, found negative iron balance in
20/38 (56%) non-thalassaemic patients with transfusional iron
overload. L1 was clearly not effective in three patients (two with
myelofibrosis and one with myelodysplasia). One patient with
myelodysplasia developed agranulocytosis after 12 months of
treatment, which was rapidly reversed after stopping L1.
Conclusion: the effectiveness of L1 in controlling body iron
burden in MDS has been documented in a small number of
patients (Level of evidence: B). Agranulocytosis has been
reported.
Deferasirox treatment
Control of body iron burden In a prospective multicentre study
on 47 MDS patients, Gattermann (2005) reported a decrease of
LIC when deferasirox was used at doses of 10–30 mg/kg/d over
1 year. The effect of deferasirox on serum ferritin was the same as
for the LIC. Mild, moderate and transient adverse events were
reported. Four patients died because of disease-related causes
and two patients discontinued treatment because of drug-related
side-effects (vomiting and mild increase in creatinine values).
Mild increases in creatinine (>33% of baseline) were observed in
eight patients but only one discontinued therapy for this reason.
No neutropenia or arthralgia were described.
Conclusion: some effectiveness of Deferasirox in controlling
body iron burden in MDS is documented in only one study
(Level of evidence: B).
Practical considerations
Thalassaemia major From the reported documentation, it is
clear that DFO remains the drug of choice for chelation
treatment. If, during DFO treatment, ferritin levels are
<2500 lg/l and LIC <7 mg/g/dry weight continuation of this treatment is advised. Moreover, if, during the same treatment,
an increase of ferritin levels >2500 lg/l and of LIC >7 mg/g/ dry weight are demonstrated the following options are
available: an increase of DFO dosage, if this is possible, or L1
treatment, or, if a high value of LIC is demonstrated,
deferasirox therapy. If, after one of these treatments, ferritin
levels are <2500 lg/l and LIC <7 mg/g/dry weight, re- initiation of baseline treatment is advised. Alternatively, if
despite the change of treatment, ferritin levels remain
>2500 lg/l and LIC remains >7 mg/g/dry weight, continuous s.c. or i.v. DFO, or L1 associated with DFO therapy are
advised. In the presence of heart failure, continuous s.c. or i.v.
DFO treatment has more clear-cut documentation of efficacy
than combined treatment (DFO and L1) (Table III), although
more recent data in the literature seem to suggest that the latter
could be a satisfactory alternative. If DFO intolerance is
present, the following two options are possible: L1 or, if LIC is
>7 mg/g/dry weight, deferasirox. Monitoring of specific side
effects during chelation treatments is mandatory.
Sickle-cell disease and myelodysplastic syndromes There are few
relevant clinical trials to define the real impact of these
treatments in SCD and MDS or whether a particular form of
chelation therapy could be more effective than another.
However, at present there is more documentation to support
the use of DFO treatment in these diseases.
The author declares that he does not have potential conflicts
of interest with the pharmaceutical companies involved in
these studies.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Dr Samir Ballas, Dr D. Rund, Dr B. Modell
and Dr L. Mancuso for reviewing the manuscript. Much of the
author’s knowledge of this subject was due to a research grants
from the Health Regional Service. Additional support for my
research was provided by Associazione per la Ricerca ‘Piera
Cutino’, Fondazione ‘Leonardo Giambrone’, Associazione del
Bambino Emopatico.
References
Addis, A., Loebstein, R., Koren, G. & Einarson, T-R. (1999) Meta-
analytic review of the clinical effectiveness of oral deferiprone (L1).
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 55, 1–6.
Agarwal, M.B., Gupte, S.S., Viswanathan, C., Vasandani, D., Raman-
athan, J., Desai, N., Puniyani, R.R. & Chhablani, A.T. (1995) Long-
term assessment of efficacy and safety of L1, an oral iron chelator in
transfusion dependent thalassaemia: Indian trial. British Journal of
Haematology, 82, 460–466.
Al-Refaie, F.N., Wonke, B., Wickens, D.G., Aydinok, Y., Fielding, A. &
Hoffbrand, A.V. (1994) Zinc concentration in patients with iron
overload receiving oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-
4-one or desferrioxamine. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 47, 657–
660.
Review
ª 2007 The Author 416 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
Al-Refaie, F.N., Sheppard, L.N., Nortey, P., Wonke, B. & Hoffbrand,
A.V. (1995a) Pharmacokinetics of the oral chelator deferiprone (L1)
in patients with iron overload. British Journal of Haematology, 89,
403–408.
Al-Refaie, F.N., Hershko, C., Hoffbrand, A.V., Kosaryan, M., Olivieri,
N.F., Tondury, P. & Wonke, B. (1995b) Results of long-term def-
eriprone (L1) therapy: a report by the International Study Group on
oral iron chelators. British Journal of Haematology, 91, 224–229.
Alessandrino, E.P., Amadori, S., Barosi, G., Cazzola, M., Grossi, A.,
Liberato, L.N., Locatelli, F., Marchetti, M., Morra, E., Rebulla, P.,
Visani, G. & Tura, S. (2002) Evidence and consensus-based practice
guidelines for the therapy of primary myelodysplastic syndromes. A
statement from the Italian Society of Haematology. Haematologica,
87, 1286–1306.
Alvero, A.B., Chen, W., Sartorelli, A.C., Schwartz, P., Rutherford, T. &
Mor, G. (2006) Triapine (3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thi-
osemicarbazone) induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Journal of
Society Gynaecology Investigation, 13, 145–152.
Anderson, L.J., Wonke, B., Prescott, E., Holden, S., Walker, M. &
Pennell, D.J. (2002) Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone
and subcutaneous desferioxamine on myocardial iron concentration
and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia. Lancet, 360, 516–520.
Anderson, L.J., Westwood, M.A., Holden, S., Davis, B., Prescott, E.,
Wonke, B., Porter, J.B., Walker, J.M. & Pennell, D.J. (2004) Myo-
cardial iron clearance during reversal of siderotic cardiomyopathy
with intravenous desferrioxamine: a prospective study using T2*
cardiovascular magnetic resonance. British Journal of Haematology,
127, 348–355.
Athanassiou-Metaxa, M., Kousi, A., Hatzipantelis, E.S., Tsatra, I.,
Ikonomou, M., Perifanis, V. & Tsantali, H. (2004) Combined che-
lation therapy with deferiprone and desferrioxamine in iron over-
loaded beta-thalassaemia patients. Haematologica, 89, ELT07.
Aydinok, Y., Nisli, G., Kavakl, K., Coker, C., Kantar, M. & Cetingui, N.
(1999) Sequential use of deferiprone and desferioxamine in primary
school children with thalassaemia major in Turkey. Acta Haema-
tologica, 102, 17–21.
Barry, M., Flynn, D.M., Letsky, E.A. & Ridson, R.A. (1974) Long term
chelation therapy in thalassaemia major: effect on liver iron con-
centration, liver histology and clinical progress. British Medical
Journal, 2, 16–20.
Bergeron, R.J., Wiegand, J., Mcmanis, J.S., McCosar, B.H., Weimar,
W.R., Brittenham, G.M. & Smith, R.E. (1999) Effects of a C-4 ste-
reochemistry and C-4’ hydroxylation on the iron clearing efficiency
and toxicity of desferrithiocin analogues. Journal of Medical Chem-
istry, 42, 2432–2440.
Borgna-Pignatti, C. & Cohen, A. (1997) Evaluation of a new method of
administration of the iron chelating agent deferoxamine. Journal of
Paediatrics, 130, 86–88.
Borgna-Pignatti, C., Franchini, M., Gandini, G., Vassanelli, A., De
Gironzoli, M. & Aprili, G. (1998) Subcutaneous bolus injection of
deferoxamine in adult patients affected by onco-hemato-logic dis-
eases and iron overload. Haematologica, 83, 788–790.
Borgna-Pignatti, C., Rugolotto, S., De Stefano, P., Zhao, H., Cappel-
lini, M.D., Del Vecchio, G.C., Romeo, M.A., Forni, G.L., Gamberini,
M.R., Ghilardi, R., Piga, A. & Cnaan, A. (2004) Survival and
complications in patients with thalassaemia major treated with
transfusion and deferoxamine. Haematologica, 89, 1187–1192.
Borgna-Pignatti, C., Cappellini, M.D., De Stefano, P., Del Vecchio,
G.C., Forni, G.L., Gamberini, M.R., Ghilardi, R., Piga, A., Romeo,
M.A., Zhao, H. & Cnaan, A. (2006) Cardiac morbidity in deferox-
amine or deferiprone-treated patients with thalassaemia major.
Blood, 107, 3733–3737.
Bousquet, J., Navarro, M., Robert, G., Aye, P. & Michel, F.B. (1983)
Rapid desensitisation for desferrioxamine anaphylactoid reaction.
Lancet, 2, 859–860.
Bowen, D., Culligan, D., Jowitt, S., Kelsey, S., Mufti, G., Oscier, D. &
Parker, J. of the UK MDS Guidelines Group (2003) Guidelines for
the diagnosis and therapy of adult myelodysplastic syndromes.
British Journal of Haematology, 120, 187–200.
Brittenham, G.M., Griffith, P.M., Nienhuis, A.W., McLaren, C.E.,
Young, N.S., Tucker, E.E., Allen, C.J., Farrell, D.E. & Harris, J.W.
(1994) Efficacy of deferoxamine in preventing complications of iron
overload in patients with thalassaemia major. New England Journal
of Medicine, 331, 567–573.
Callea, F. (1998) Iron chelation with oral deferiprone in patients
with thalassaemia (letter). New England Journal of Medicine, 339,
1710.
Cappellini, M.D., Cohen, A., Piga, A., Bejaoui, M., Perrotta, S.,
Agaoglu, L., Aydinok, Y., Kattamis, A., Kilinc, Y., Porter, J., Capra,
M., Galanello, R., Fattoum, S., Drelichman, G., Magnano, C.,
Verissimo, M., Athanassiou-Metaxa, M., Giardina, P., Kourakli-
Symeonidis, A., Janka-Schaub, G., Coates, T., Vermylen, C., Olivieri,
N., Thuret, I., Opitz, H., Ressayre-Djaffer, C., Marks, P. & Alberti, D.
(2006) A phase 3 study of deferasirox (ICL670), a once-daily oral
iron chelator, in patients with beta-thalassaemia. Blood, 107, 3455–
3462.
Ceci, A., Baiardi, P., Felisi, M.G., Cappellini, M.D., Carnelli, V., De
Sanctis, V., Galanello, R., Maggio, A., Masera, G., Piga, A., Schettini,
F., Stefano, I. & Tricta, F. (2002) The safety and effectiveness of
deferiprone in a large scale 3 years study in Italian patients. British
Journal of Haematology, 118, 330–336.
Ceci, A., Baiardi, P., Catapano, M., Felisi, M.G., Cianciulli, P., De
Sanctis, V., Del Veccio, G.C., Magnano, C., Meo, A. & Maggio, A.
(2006) Risk factors for death in patients with b-thalassaemia major:results of a case-control study. Haematologica, 91, 1420–1421.
Cohen, A.R. & Schwartz, E. (1978) Excretion of iron in response
to deferoxamine in sickle cell anemia. Journal of Paediatrics, 92,
659–662.
Cohen, A.R. & Schwartz, E. (1979) Iron chelation therapy in sickle cell
anemia. American Journal of Haematology, 7, 69–76.
Cohen, A.R., Galanello, R., Piga, A., Dipalma, A., Vullo, C. & Tricta, F.
(2000) Safety profile of the oral iron chelator deferiprone: a multi-
centre study. British Journal of Haematology, 108, 305–312.
Collins, A.F., Fassos, F.F., Stobie, S., Lewis, N., Shaw, D., Fry, M.,
Templeton, D.M., McClelland, M.A., Koren, G. & Olivieri, N.F.
(1994) Iron balance and dose-response study of the oral iron
chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one (L1) in iron loaded
patients with SCD. Blood, 83, 2329–2333.
Cunningham, M.J., Macklin, E.A., Neufeld, E.J., Cohen, A.R. &
Thalassaemia Clinical Research Network (2004) Complications of
b-thalassaemia major in North America. Blood, 104, 34–39. Daar, S. & Pathare, A.V. (2006) Combined therapy with desferriox-
amine and deferiprone in beta-thalassaemia major patients with
transfusional overload. Annals of Haematology, 85, 315–319.
Daraio, F., Ryan, E., Gleeson, F., Roetto, A., Crowe, J. & Camaschella,
C. (2005) Juvenile hemochromatosis due to G320V/Q116X com-
pound heterozygosity of hemojuvelin in a Irish patient. Blood Cells,
Molecules and Diseases, 35, 174–176.
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 417
Davis, B.A. & Porter, L.B. (2000) Long-term outcome of continous 24-
hour deferoxamine infusion via indwelling intravenous catheters in
high-risk beta-thalassaemia. Blood, 95, 1229–1236.
Davis, B.A., O’Sullivan, C., Jarrit, P.H. & Porter, J.B. (2004) Value of
sequential monitoring of left ventricular ejection fraction in the
management of thalassaemia major. Blood, 104, 263–269.
De Virgiliis, S., Congia, M., Frau, F., Argiolu, F., Diana, G., Cucca, F.,
Varsi, A., Sanna, G., Podda, G. & Fodde, M. (1988) Desferrioxamine
induced growth retardation in patients with thalassaemia major.
Journal of Paediatrics, 113, 661–669.
Del Rio Garma, J., Fernandez Lago, C. & Batlle Fonrodona, F.J. (1997)
Desferrioxamine treatment in myelodysplastyc syndromes. Haema-
tologica, 82, 639–640.
Dickeroff, R. (1987) Acute aphasia and loss of vision with desfer-
rioxamine overdose. American Journal of Paediatrics Hematology and
Oncology, 9, 287–288.
Dolgin, M. (1994) Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Disease of
the Heart and Great Vessels. The criteria committee of the New York
Heart Association. Little, Brown & Co., Boston, Mass, USA, 253–
256.
Donovan, J.M., Plone, M., Dagher, R., Bree, M. & Marquis, J. (2005)
Preclinical and clinical development of deferitrin, a novel, orally
available iron chelator. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences,
1054, 492–494.
Efthimidias, G.K., Hassapopoulou, H.P., Tsikaderis, D.D., Karvounis,
H.I., Giannakoulas, G.A., Parharidis, G.E. & Louridas, G.E. (2006)
Survival in thalassaemia major patients. Circulation, 70, 1037–1042.
Fabio, G., Minonzio, F., Delbini, P., Bianchi, A. & Cappellini, M.D.
(2007) Reversal of cardiac complications by deferiprone and defe-
roxamine combination therapy in a patients affected by severe type
of juvenile hemochromatosis (JH). Blood, 109, 362–364.
Farmaki, K., Angelopoulos, N., Anagnostopoulos, G., Gotsis, E.,
Rombopoulos, G. & Tolis, G. (2006) Effect of enhanced iron
chelation therapy on glucose metabolism in patients with beta-
thalassaemia major. British Journal of Haematology, 134, 438–444.
Freedman, M.H., Grisaru, D., Olivieri, N., MacLusky, I. & Thorner,
P.S. (1990) Pulmonary syndrome in patients with thalassaemia
major receiving intravenous deferoxamine infusions. American
Journal of Diseases of Children, 144, 565–569.
Fung, E.B., Harmatz, P., Madden, J., Vichinsky, E. & Group M-CSoIOS
(2004) Organ Dysfunction in Iron Overloading Patients with Beta-
thalassaemia or Sickle-cell Disease. Presented at 27th Annual Meeting
of the National Sickle Cell Disease Programme, Los Angeles. April
18–21.
Fung, E.B., Harmatz, P., Milet, M., Ballas, S.K., De Castro, L., Hagar,
W., Owen, W., Olivieri, N., Smith-Whitley, K., Darbari, D., Wang,
W. & Vichinsky, E. (2007) Morbidity and mortality in chronically
transfused subjects with thalassemia and sickle cell disease: a report
from the multicenter study of iron overload. American Journal of
Hematology, 82, 255–265.
Galanello, R., Kattamis, A., Piga, A., Fischer, R., Leoni, G., Ladis, V.,
Voi, V., Lund, U. & Tricta, F. (2006) A prospective randomized
controlled trial on the safety and efficacy of alternating deferox-
amine and deferiprone in the treatment of iron overload in patients
with thalassaemia. Haematologica, 91, 1241–1243.
Gamberini, M.R., Fortini, M., Gilli, G., Testa, M.R. & De Sanctis, V.
(1998) Epidemiology and chelation therapy effects on glucose
homeostasis in thalassaemic patients. Journal Paediatrics Endocrin-
ology Metabolism, 11(Suppl. 3), 867–869.
Gamberini, M.R., Fortini, M., De Sanctis, V., Gilli, G. & Testa, M.R.
(2004) Diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in thalas-
saemia major: incidence, prevalence, risk factors and survival in
patients followed in the Ferrara Center. Paediatrics Endocrinology
Review, 2(Suppl. 2), 285–291.
Gattermann, N. (2005) Clinical consequences of iron overload in
myelodysplastic syndromes and treatment with chelators. Haema-
tology/Oncology Clinics, 19(Suppl. 1), 13–17.
Gattermann, N., Porter, J., Lopes, L.F. & Seymour, J. (2005) Consensus
statement on iron overload in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haema-
tology/Oncology Clinics, 19(Suppl. 1), 18–25.
Giardina, P.J., Nealon, N., McQueen, M., Martin, M., Schotland, D. &
Cohen, A. (1993) Sensorimotor neuropathy associated with high
dose desferrioxamine. Blood, 78(Abstract Suppl. 1), 199a.
Gomber, S., Saxena, R. & Madan, N. (2004) Comparative efficacy of
desferrioxamine, deferiprone and in combination on iron chelation
in thalassemic children. Indian Paediatrics, 41, 21–27.
Graziano, J.H., Markenson, A., Miller, D.R., Chang, H., Bestak, M.,
Meyers, P., Pisciotto, P. & Rifkind, A. (1978) Chelation therapy in
beta-thalassaemia major.I. Intravenous and subcutaneous deferox-
amine. Journal of Paediatrics, 92, 648–652.
Green, D.A., Antholine, W.E., Wong, S.J., Richardson, D.R. & Chit-
amber, C.R. (2001) Inhibition of malignant cell growth by 311, a
novel iron chelator of the pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone class:
effect on the R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase. Clinics Cancer
Research, 7, 3574–3579.
Harmatz, P., Butensky, E., Quirolo, K., Williams, R., Ferrell, L., Moyer,
T., Golden, T., Neumayr, L. & Vichinsky, E. (2000) Severity of iron
overload in patients with sickle cell disease receiving chronic red
blood cells transfusion therapy. Blood, 96, 76–79.
Hemsen, C, Jensen, P.D., Heickendorff, L. & Pedersen, B. (1996) The
effect of iron chelation on haemopoiesis in MDS patients with trans-
fusional iron overload. British Journal of Haematology, 94, 188–199.
Hershko, C., Konijn, A.M. & Link, G. (1998) Iron chelators for
thalassaemia. British Journal of Haematology, 101, 399–406.
Hileti, D., Ward, R.J. & Peters, T.J. (1995) Pharmacokinetics, tissue
distribution and cell uptake of 14C labelled oral iron chelator 1,2-
dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one (L1) in the rat [Abstract]. British
Journal of Haematology, 89(Suppl. 1), 87.
Hoffbrand, A.V., Al-Refaie, F., Davis, B., Siritanakatkul, N., Jackson,
B.F., Cochrane, J., Prescott, E. & Wonke, B. (1998) Long-term trial
of deferiprone in 51 transfusion-dependent iron overload patients.
Blood, 91, 295–300.
Italian Working Group on Endocrine Complications in Non-endo-
crine Diseases (1995) Multicentre study on prevalence of endocrine
complications in thalassaemia major. Clinical Endocrinology (Oxf),
42, 581–586.
Jackson, M.J., Brenton, D.P. & Modell, B. (1983) DTPA in the man-
agement of iron overload in thalassaemia. Journal of Inherited
Metabolism Diseases, 6(Suppl. 2), 97.
Jensen, P.D., Jensen, I.M. & Ellegaard, J. (1992) Desferrioxamine
treatment reduces blood transfuson requirement in patients
with myelodysplastic syndrome. British Journal of Haematology, 80,
121–124.
Kattamis, A., Ladis, V., Berdousi, H., Kelekis, N.L., Alexopoulou, E.,
Papasotiriou, I., Drakaki, K., Kaloumenou, I., Galani, A., Kattamis,
C. (2006) Iron chelation treatment with combined therapy with
deferiprone and deferioxamine: a 12-month trial. Blood Cells, Mol-
ecules and Diseases, 36, 21–25.
Review
ª 2007 The Author 418 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
Kersten, M.J., Lange, R., Smeets, M.E., Vreugdenhil, G., Roozendaal,
K.J., Lameijer, W. & Goudsmit, R. (1996) Long-term treatment of
transfusional iron overload with the oral iron chelator deferiprone
(L1): a Dutch multicentre trial. Annals of Haematology, 73, 247–252.
Klocke, F.J., Baird, M.G., Lorell, B.H., Bateman, T.M., Messer, J.V.,
Berman, D.S., O’Gara, P.T., Carabello, B.A., Russell, R.O. Jr,
Cerqueira, M.D., St. John Sutton, M.G., DeMaria, A.N., Udelson,
J.E., Kennedy, J.W., Verani, M.S., Williams, K.A., Antman, E.M.,
Smith, S.C. Jr, Alpert, J.S., Gregoratos, G., Anderson, J.L., Hiratzka,
L.F., Faxon, D.P., Hunt, S.A., Fuster, V., Jacobs, A.K., Gibbons, R.J.
& Russell, R.O. (2003) ACC/AHA/ASNC Guidelines for the clinical
use of cardiac radionuclide imaging, executive summary: a report of
the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
task force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to
Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radio-
nuclide Imaging). Circulation, 108, 1404–1418.
Kobayashi, M., Yano, K. & Fujisawa, S. (1996) Long-term efficacy of
subcutaneous administration of deferoxamine in patients with
secondary hemochromatosis. Rinsho Ketsueki, 37, 303–310.
Kontoghiorghes, G.J. (1982) The Design of Orally Active Iron Chelators
for the Treatment of Thalassaemia. PhD thesis, University of Essex,
Colchester, UK. British Library Microfilm No D66194/86.
Kontoghiorghes, G.J. (1993) Present status and future prospects of oral
iron chelation therapy in thalassaemia and other diseases. Indian
Journal of Paediatrics, 60, 485.
Kontoghiorghes, G.J., Goddard, J.G., Bartlett, A.N. & Sheppard, L.
(1990a) Pharmacokinetics studies in humans with the oral iron
chelator 1,2- dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one. Clinical Pharma-
cology Therapy, 48, 255–261.
Kontoghiorghes, G.J., Bartlett, A.N., Hoffbrand, A.V., Goddard, J.G.,
Sheppard, L., Barr, J. & Nortey, P. (1990b) Long-term trial with the
oral iron chelator 1,2-dimethyl-3- hydoxypyrid-4-one (L1).I. Iron
chelation and metabolic studies. British Journal of Haematology, 76,
295–300.
Kontoghiorghes, G.J., Pattichis, K., Neocleous, K. & Kolnagou, A.
(2004) The design and development of deferiprone (L1) and other
iron chelators for clinical use: targeting methods and application
prospects. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 11, 2161–2183.
Koren, G., Kochavi-Atiya, Y., Bentur, Y. & Olivieri, N.F. (1991) The
effect of subcutaneous desferoxamine administration on renal
function in thalassaemia major. Internal Journal of Haematology, 54,
371–375.
Kruger, N., Stubbe, P., Tillmann, W., Schroter, W. (1986) Continuous
subcutaneous deferoxamine infusions in thalassaemia major.
Improvement in glucose tolerance. Deutsche Medizinische
Wochenschrift, 111, 698–701.
Lai, M.E., Vacquer, S., Pepe, A., Maggio, A., Carta, M.P., Cianciulli, P.,
Bina, P., Sau, F. & Grady, W.R. (2006) Long-term outcome of iron-
induced cardiac disease in patients with thalassaemia major treated
with combined DFP/DFO or DFO alone. ASH Meeting, Blood, 108,
November 16, (Abstract) # 1764.
Li, C.K., Luk, C.W., Ling, S.C., Chik, K.W., Yuen, H.L., Li, C.K., Shing,
M.M., Chang, K.O. & Yuen, P.M. (2002) Morbidity and mortality
patterns of thalassaemia major patients in Hong Kong: retrospective
study. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 8, 255–260.
Lovejoy, D.B. & Richardson, D.R. (2002) Novel ‘‘hybrid’’ iron chela-
tors derived from aroylhydrazones and thiosemicarbazones dem-
onstrate selective antiproliferative activity against tumor cells. Blood,
100, 666–676.
Maggio, A., D’Amico, G., Morabito, A., Capra, M., Ciaccio, C.,
Cianciulli, P., Di Gregorio, F., Garozzo, G., Malizia, R., Magnano,
C., Mangiagli, A., Quarta, G., Rizzo, M., D’Ascola, D.G., Rizzo, A. &
Midiri, M. (2002) Deferiprone versus deferoxamine in patients with
thalassaemia major: a randomised clinical trial. Blood Cells, Mole-
cules and Diseases, 28, 196–208.
Maggio, A., D’Amico, G. & Morabito, A. (2004) Independent clinical
trials. Lancet, 363, 1080.
Maggio, A., Rigano, P., D’Amico, G. & Mascolino, A. (2005)
Treatment with hydroxyurea and iron chelation therapy in patients
with hemoglobinopathies. European Journal of Haematology, 75,
267–269.
Miskin, H., Yaniv, I., Berant, M., Heshko, C. & Tamary, H. (2003)
Reversal of cardiac complications in thalassaemia major by long-
term intermittent daily intensive iron chelation. European Journal of
Haematology, 70, 398–403.
Modell, B., Letsky, E.A., Flynn, D.M., Peto, R. & Weatherall, D.J.
(1982) Survival and deferioxamine in thalassaemia major. British
Medical Journal, 284, 1981–1984.
Modell, B., Khan, M. & Darlison, M. (2000) Survival in beta thalas-
saemia major in the United Kingdom: data from the UK Thalas-
saemia Register. Lancet, 355, 2051–2052.
Mourad, F.H., Hoffbrand, A.V., Sheikah-Taha, M., Koussa, S.,
Khoriaty, A.I. & Taher, A. (2003) Comparison between desferriox-
amine and combined therapy with desferrioxamine and deferiprone
in iron overloaded thalassaemia patients. British Journal of Haema-
tology, 121, 187–189.
Muntean, W., Hauer, C. & Schmid, C. (1989) A 2-year-old male pa-
tient with congenital sideroblastic anemia and long-term chelation
therapy. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 101, 330–334.
Neufeld, E.J. (2006) Oral chelators deferasirox and deferiprone for
transfusional iron overload in thalassaemia major: new data, new
questions. Blood, 107, 3436–3441.
Nick, H., Acklin, P., Lattmann, R., Buehlmayer, P., Hauffe, S., Schupp,
J. & Alberti, D. (2003) Development of tridentate iron chelators:
from desferrithiocin to ICL670. Current Medical Chemistry, 10,
1065–1076.
Olivieri, N., Buncic, J.R., Chew, E., Gallant, T., Harrison, R.V., Keenan,
N., Logan, W., Mitchell, D., Ricci, G. & Skarf, B. (1986) Visual and
auditory neuro-toxicity in patients receiving subcutaneous defer-
rioxamine infusions. New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 869–
873.
Olivieri, N.F., Koren, G., Herman, C., Bentur, Y., Chung, D., Klein, J.,
St. Louis, P., Freedman, M.H., McClelland, R.A. & Templeton, D.M.
(1990) Comparison of oral iron chelator L1 and desferrioxamine in
iron-loaded patients. Lancet, 336, 1275–1279.
Olivieri, N.F., Nathan, D.G., McMillan, J.H., Wayne, A.S., Liu, P.P.,
McGee, A., Martin, M., Koren, G. & Cohen, A.R. (1994) Survival in
medically treated patients with homozygous beta-thalassaemia. New
England Journal of Medicine, 331, 574–578.
Olivieri, N.F., Brittenham, G.M., McLaren, C.E., Templeton, D.M.,
Cameron, R.G., McClelland, R.A., Burt, A.D. & Fleming, K.A. (1998)
Long-term safety and effectiveness of iron-chelation therapy with
deferiprone for thalassaemia major. New England Journal of Medi-
cine, 339, 417–423.
Origa, R. & Galanello, R. (2004) Neutropenia in patients with thalas-
saemia major. Blood, 104 (abstract 3763).
Origa, R., Bina, P., Agus, A., Crobu, G., Defraia, E., Dessı̀, C., Leoni,
G.B., Uroni, P.P. & Galanello, R. (2005) Combined therapy with
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 419
desferrioxamine and deferiprone in thalassaemia major. Haematol-
ogica, 90, 1309–1314.
Orton, R., Veber, L. & Sulh, I.I. (1985) Ocular and auditory toxicity of
high dose subcutaneous deferoxamine therapy. Canadian Journal
Ophthalmology, 20, 153–156.
Pennell, D.J., Berdoukas, V., Karagiorga, M., Ladis, V., Piga, A.,
Aessopos, A., Gotsis, E.D., Tanner, M.A., Smith, G.C., Westwood,
M.A., Wonke, B. & Galanello, R. (2006) Randomized controlled trial
of deferiprone or deferoxamine in beta-thalassaemia major patients
with asymptomatic myocardial siderosis. Blood, 107, 3738–3744.
Pepe, A., Lombardi, M., Postano, V., Cracolici, E., Capra, M., Malizia,
R., Prossomariti, L., De Marchi, D., Midiri, M. & Maggio, A. (2006)
Evaluation of the efficacy of oral deferiprone in beta-thalassaemia
major by multislice multiecho T2*. European Journal of Haematol-
ogy, 76, 183:192.
Piga, A., Gaglioti, G., Fogliacco, E. & Tricta, F. (2003) Comparative
effects of deferiprone and deferoxamine on survival and cardiac
disease in patients with thalassaemia major: a retrospective analysis.
Haematologica, 88, 489–496.
Piga, A., Galanello, R., Forni, G.L., Cappellini, M.D., Origa, R., Zappu,
A., Donato, G., Bordone, E., Lavagetto, A., Zanaboni, L., Sechaud,
R., Hewson, N., Ford, J.M., Opitz, H. & Alberti, D. (2006) Rand-
omised phase II trial of deferasirox (Exjade, ICL670), a once-daily,
orally-administered iron chelator, in comparison to deferoxamine in
thalassaemia patients with transfusion iron overload. Haematologica,
91, 873–880.
Pippard, M.J., Callender, S.T. & Finch, C.A. (1982) Ferrioxamine
excretion in iron-loaded man. Blood, 60, 288–294.
Platis, O., Anagnostopoulos, G., Farmaki, K., Posantzis, M., Gotsis, E.
& Tolis, G. (2004) Glucose metabolism disorders improvement in
patients with thalassaemia major after 24–36 months of intensive
chelation therapy. Paediatrics Endocrinological Review, 2(Suppl. 2),
279–281.
Porcu, M., Landis, N., Salis, S., Corda, M., Orru, P., Serra, E., Usai, B.,
Matta, G. & Galanello, R. (2006) Effects of combined deferiprone
and desferrioxamine iron chelating therapy in beta-thalassaemia
major end-stage heart failure. A case report. European Journal Heart
Failure, (Epub ahead of print), Oct. 4.
Porter, J. & Davies, B.A. (2002) Monitoring chelation therapy to
achieve optimal outcome in the treatment of thalassaemia. Best
Practice Research in Clinical Haematology, 15, 329–368.
Porter, J.B., Tanner, M.A., Pennell, D.J. & Elefteriou, P. (2005) Im-
proved myocardial T2* in transfusion dependent anemias receiving
ICL 670 (Deferasirox). Blood, 106, 1003a, Abstract 3600.
Propper, R.D., Shurin, S.B. & Nathan, D.G. (1976) Reassessment of the
use of desferrioxamine B in iron overload. New England Journal of
Medicine, 294, 1421–1423.
Rakba, N., Aouad, F., Henry, C., Caris, C., Morel, I., Baret, P., Pierre,
J.L., Brissot, P., Ward, R.J., Lescoat, G. & Crichton, R.R. (1998) Iron
mobilisation and cellular protection by new synthetic chelator O-
Trensox. Biochemistry Pharmacology, 55, 1797–1806.
Ritchie, J.C., Bateman, T.M., Bonow, R.O., Crawford, M.H., Gibbons,
R.J., Hall, R.J., O’Rourke, R.A., Parisi, A.F. & Verani, M.S. (1995)
Guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging:
report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart
Association Task Force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic
cardiovascular procedures (Committee on Radionuclide Imaging),
developed in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear
Cardiology. Journal American College Cardiology, 25, 521–547.
Rodda, C.P., Reid, E.D., Johnson, S., Doery, J., Matthews, R. & Bow-
den, D.K. (1995) Short stature in homozygous beta-thalassaemia is
due to disproportionate truncal shortening. Clinical Endocrinology,
42, 587–592.
Schroeder, P.E. & Hasinoff, B.B. (2005) Metabolism of the one-ring
open metabolites of the cardioprotective drug dexrazoxane to its
active metal-chelating form in the rat. Drug Metabolism and
Disposition: the Biological Fate of Chemicals, 33, 1367–1372.
Silliman, C.C., Peterson, V.M., Mellman, D.L., Dixon, D.J, Hambidge,
K.M. & Lane, P.A. (1993) Iron chelation by deferoxamine in sickle
cell patients with severe transfusion-induced hemosiderosis: a
randomised, double-blind study of the dose-response relationship.
Journal of Laboratory Clinical Medicine, 122, 48–54.
Singh, S., Epemolu, R., Dobbin, P.S., Tilbrook, G.S., Ellis, B.L.,
Damani, L.A. & Hider, R.C. (1992) Urinary metabolic profiles in
human and rat of 1,2-dimethyl- and 1,2-diethyl-substituted
3-hydroxypyridin-4-ones. Drug Metabolism and Disposition: the
Biological Fate of Chemicals, 20, 256–261.
Stella, M., Pinzello, G. & Maggio, A. (1998) Iron chelation with oral
deferiprone in patients with thalassaemia. New England Journal of
Medicine, 339, 1712.
Taher, A., Chamoun, S. & Koussa, S. (1997) Efficacy and tolerance of
the oral iron chelator, deferiprone, in thalassaemia: the Lebanese
experience (abstract). British Journal of Haematology, 96, 254.
Tanner, M.A., Galanello, R., Dessi, C., Westwood, M.A., Smith, G.C.,
Khan, M., Nair, S.V., Walzer, J.M. & Pennell, D.J. (2005) A rand-
omized, placebo controlled, double blind trial of the effect of
combined therapy with deferoxamine and deferiprone on myocar-
dial iron in thalassaemia major using cardiovascular magnetic res-
onance. ASH Meeting, Blood, 106, (Abstract) # 3655.
Tanner, M.A., Galanello, R., Dessi, C., Smith, G.C., Westwood,
M.A., Agus, A., Roughton, M., Assomull, R., Nair, S.V., Walker,
J.M. & Pennell, D.J. (2007) A randomized, placebo controlled,
double blind trial of the effect of combined therapy with defe-
roxamine and deferiprone on myocardial iron in thalassaemia
major using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation, 115,
1876–1884.
Tavecchia, L., Masera, N., Russo, P., Ciro, A., Vincenzi, A., Vimercati,
C. & Masera, G. (2006) Successful recovery of acute hemosiderotic
heart failure in beta-thalassaemia major treated with a combined
regimen of desferrioxamine and deferiprone. Haematologica,
91(Suppl. 6), ECR19.
Telfer, P., Coen, P.G., Christou, S., Hadjigavrial, M., Kolnaku, A.,
Pangalou, E., Pavlides, N., Psiloines, M., Simamonian, K., Skordos,
G., Sitarou, M. & Angastiniotis, M. (2006) Survival of medically
treated thalasemia patients in Cyprus. Trends and risk factors over
the period 1980–2004. Haematologica, 91, 1187–1192.
Töndury, P., Zimmermann, A., Nielsen, P. & Hirt, A. (1998) Liver iron
and fibrosis during long-term treatment with deferiprone in Swiss
thalassemic patients. British Journal of Haematology, 101, 413–415.
Torti, S.V., Torti, F.M., Whitman, S.P., Brechbiel, M.W., Park, G. &
Planalp, R.P. (1998) Tumor cell cytotoxicity of a novel metal che-
lator. Blood, 92, 1384–1389.
Treadwell, M.J., Law, A.W., Sung, J., Hackney-Stephens, E., Quirolo,
K., Murray, E., Glendenning, G.A. & Vichinsky, E. (2005) Barriers to
adherence of deferoxamine usage in sickle-cell disease. Paediatrics
Blood Cancer, 44, 500–507.
Tsironi, M., Defteros, S., Andriopoulos, P., Farmakis, D., Meletis, J. &
Aessopos, A. (2005a) Reversal of heart failure in thalassaemia major
Review
ª 2007 The Author 420 Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421
by combined chelation therapy: a case report. European Journal of
Haematology, 74, 84–85.
Tsironi, M., Polonifi, K., Deftereos, S., Farmakis, D., Andriopoulos, P.,
Moyssakis, I. & Aessopos, A. (2005b) Transfusional hemosiderosis
and combined chelation therapy in sickle thalassaemia. European
Journal of Haematology, 75, 355–358.
Vichinsky, E., Fisher, R., Fung, E., Onyekwere, O., Porter, J., Swerdlow,
P., Coates, T., Lane, P., Files, B., Mueller, B.U., Bernaudin, F., Forni,
G.L., Ressayre-Djaffer, C., Gathmann, I., Holland, J., Alberti, D. &
Marks, P. (2005) A randomized controlled phase II trial in sickle cell
disease patients with chronic iron overload demonstrates that the
once-daily oral iron chelator deferasirox (Exjade�) (ICL670) is well tolerated and reduces iron burden (abstract). Blood, 106, 95a.Ab-
stract 313.
Vichinsky, E., Onyekwere, O., Porter, J., Swerdlow, P., Eckman, J.,
Lane, P., Files, B., Hassell, K., Kelly, P., Wilson, F., Bernaudin, F.,
Forni, G.L., Okpala, I., Ressayre-Djaffer, C., Alberti, D., Holland, J.,
Marks, P., Fung, E., Fisher, R., Mueller, B.U. & Coates, T., Defer-
asirox in Sickle Cell Investigators (2007) A randomised comparison
of deferasirox versus deferoxamine for the treatment of transfusional
iron overload in sickle cell disease. British Journal Haematology, 136,
501–508.
Voskaridou, E., Douskou, M., Terpos, E., Stamoulakatou, A., Meletis,
J., Ourailidis, A., Papassotiriou, I. & Loukopoulos, D. (2005)
Deferiprone as an oral iron chelator in sickle cell disease. Annals of
Haematology, 84, 434–440.
Wang, C.H., Wu, K.H., Tsai, F.J., Peng, C.T. & Tsai, C.H. (2006)
Comparison of oral and subcutaneous iron chelation therapies in
the prevention of major endocrinopathies in beta-thalassaemia
major patients. Hemoglobin, 30, 257–262.
Wanless, I.R., Sweeney, G., Dhillon, A.P., Guido, M., Piga, A.,
Galanello, R., Gamberini, M.R., Schwartz, E. & Cohen, A.R. (2002)
Lack of progressive hepatic fibrosis during long-term therapy with
deferiprone in subjects with transfusion-dependent b-thalassaemia. Blood, 100, 1566–1569.
Wonke, B., Wright, C. & Hoffbrand, A.V. (1998) Combined therapy
with deferiprone and desferrioxamine. British Journal of Haematol-
ogy, 103, 361–364.
Wood, J.C., Tyszka, J.M., Carson, S., Nelson, M.D. & Coates, T.D.
(2004) Myocardial iron loading in transfusion-dependent thalas-
saemia and sickle cell disease. Blood, 103, 1934–1936.
Wood, J.C., Otto-Duessel, M., Aguilar, M., Nick, H., Nelson, M.D.,
Coates, T.D., Pollack, H. & Moats, R. (2005) Cardiac iron deter-
mines cardiac T2*, T2, and T1 in the gerbil model of iron cardi-
omyopathy. Circulation, 112, 535–543.
Wu, K.H., Chang, J.Sm, Tsai, C.H. & Peng, C.T. (2004) Combined
therapy with deferiprone and desferrioxamine successfully regress
severe heart failure in patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Annals
of Haematology, 83, 471–473.
Zurlo, M.G., De Stefano, P., Borgna-Pignatti, C., Di Palma, A., Piga, A.,
Melevendi, C., Di Gregorio, F., Burattini, M.G. & Terzoli, S. (1989)
Survival and causes of death in thalassaemia major. Lancet, 2, 27–30.
Review
ª 2007 The Author Journal Compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, British Journal of Haematology, 138, 407–421 421