Genetics test
3
Mendelian Genetics
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter
Lecture Presentation by Dr. Cindy Malone, California State University Northridge
1
Chapter 3 Learning Objectives
3.1 Understand how Mendel used an experimental model to study patterns of inheritance
3.2 Show how a monohybrid cross reveals how one trait is transmitted from generation to generation
3.3 Explain how Mendel's dihybrid cross generated a unique F2 ratio
3.4 Understand the timeline surrounding Mendel's work
3.5 Learn how independent assortment leads to extensive genetic variations
3.6 To see how math can be used to simplify predictions
3.7 Use statistics (chi-squared analysis) to evaluate the influence of chance on genetic data
3.8 Read pedigrees to reveal patterns of human inheritance
3.9 Understand relationship between a mutant phenotype and a gene sequence
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
2
Section 3.1: Mendel’s Experimental Design
Mendel’s model organism: peas
easy to grow
true-breeding strains
controlled matings: self-fertilization or cross-fertilization
grow to maturity in one season
observable characteristics with two distinct forms
Mendel used seven visible features
each with two contrasting traits
true-breeding strains
Mendel kept quantitative records
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.1
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
4
Section 3.1: Mendel’s Legacy
Mendel was not appreciated during his lifetime
His work was rediscovered
Geneticists recognized Mendel had discovered the basis for the transmission of hereditary traits
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Monohybrid Crosses
Monohybrid crosses
True-breeding
Involve a single pair of contrasting traits
P1 generation: Original parents
F1 generation: Offspring
F2 generation: Offspring of F1 generation crossed (self-fertilizing: “Selfing”)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Constraining Traits
F1 generation monohybrid cross
All plants have just one of two contrasting traits
F2 generation
3/4 of plants exhibit same trait as F1 generation
1/4 exhibit contrasting trait that disappeared in the F1 generation
3:1 ratio (Figure 3.1)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Reciprocal Crosses
Not sex dependent
F1 and F2 patterns of inheritance similar regardless of P1 source
Dwarf plant pollinates tall plant
Tall plant pollinates dwarf plant
Results for F1 and F2 are the same
Crosses made in both ways reciprocal crosses
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Particulate Unit Factors
Particulate unit factors (genes)
Basic units of heredity
Are passed unchanged from generation to generation
Determine various traits expressed by each individual plant
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Three of Mendel’s Postulates
Postulate #1: Unit factors exist in pairs
Genetic characters controlled by unit factors
Postulate #2: Dominance/Recessiveness
In a pair of unit factors, one unit is dominant, the other recessive
Postulate #3: Segregation
Paired unit factors segregate (separate) independently during gamete formation
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Genetic Terminology
Phenotype
Physical expression of a trait
Gene
Unit of inheritance
Allele
Alternative form of a single gene
Genotype
Genetic makeup of individual
Alleles written in pairs (DD, Dd, or dd)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Genetic Terminology (continued)
Organism inherits two alleles
One from each parent
Homozygous/Homozygote
Both alleles are the same (DD, dd)
Heterozygous/Heterozygote
Alleles are different (Dd)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Punnett Square
Punnett square
Reginald C. Punnett devised this approach
Genotypes and phenotypes resulting from combining gametes can be visualized
Displays all possible random fertilization events
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.2: Testcross: One Character
Testcross
Determines if individual displaying dominant phenotype is homozygous or heterozygous for that trait
Cross between dominant phenotype and homozygous recessive (see Figure 3.4)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.4
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.3: Dihybrid Cross
Dihybrid cross
Two pairs of contrasting traits
Generates unique F2 generation (Figure 3.5)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.5
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.3: Mendel’s Fourth Postulate
Independent assortment
Unit factors (traits) assort independently during gamete formation
All possible gamete combinations form with equal frequency (Figure 3.6)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.3: Product Law
Product law
Used to predict frequency of two independent events occurring simultaneously
Example:
F2 plant having yellow and round seeds
3/4 3/4, or 9/16
(Figure 3.6)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.6
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.3: Mendel’s 9:3:3:1 Dihybrid Ratio
F1 F1 fertilization event
Each zygote can receive one of four combinations
Example:
9/16 yellow, round seeds
3/16 yellow, wrinkled seeds
3/16 green, round seeds
1/16 green, wrinkled seeds
Gives 9:3:3:1 dihybrid ratio
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.7
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
22
Section 3.3: Testcross: Two Characters
Testcross – Two Characters
Genotypes unknown
Individuals express two dominant traits
Example: Yellow, round seed phenotype in F2 generation
Possible genotypes: GGWW, GGWw, GgWW, GgWw
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.4: Trihybrid Cross
Trihybrid cross
Segregation and independent assortment applied to three pairs of constraining traits
Punnett square with 64 boxes
Easier method:
Use forked-line method (branch diagram) (Figure 3.9)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.9
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.5: Mendel’s Work Rediscovered
Rediscovered in the early twentieth century
Mendel suggested heredity resulted in discontinuous variation – a dominance- recessive relationship
Darwin and Wallace subscribed to theory of continuous variation: offspring were a blend of parental phenotypes
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.5: Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance
Chromosomal theory of inheritance
Genetic material in living organisms contained in chromosomes
Separation of chromosomes during meiosis served as basis for Mendel’s principles of segregation and independent assortment
Independent assortment leads to extensive genetic variation
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.5: Unit Factors, Genes, and Homologous Chromosomes
Unit factors in pairs
First meiotic prophase
Segregation of unit factors during gamete formation
First meiotic anaphase
Independent assortment of segregating unit factors
Follows many meiotic events
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.10a
30
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.10b
31
Figure 3.10c
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
32
Figure 3.10
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
33
Section 3.5: Criteria for Homologous Pairs
Criteria for classifying two chromosomes as homologous pairs
Both are same size and exhibit identical centromere locations
Excludes X and Y chromosomes in mammals
Form pairs or synapse during stages of meiosis
Contain identical linear order of gene loci
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.6: Independent Assortment
Independent assortment leads to extensive genetic variation
Genetic variation is due to nonidentical homologous chromosomes
Chromosome combination produces extensive genetic variation
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Chi-Square Analysis
Chi-square analysis
Evaluates influence of chance on genetic data
Chance deviation
Chance events subject to random fluctuations
Expected outcome is diminished by larger sample size
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Predicting Genetic Outcomes
Two factors in analyzing or predicting genetic outcomes:
Independent assortment
Subject to random fluctuations due to chance deviations
Sample size
Average deviation decreases as sample size increases
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Chi-Square and Null Hypothesis
Null hypothesis
Assumes data will fit given ratio
Assumes there is no real difference between measured values and predicted values
Apparent difference attributed purely to chance
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Chi-Square Analysis
Chi-square (2)
Goodness of fit of null hypothesis
Analysis used to test how well the data fit the null hypothesis
Analysis of observed vs. expected deviations
Table 3.3 shows the steps in 2 calculations for the F2 generation of a monohybrid cross
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Table 3.3
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Degrees of Freedom (df)
Degrees of freedom (df)
Equal to n 1
n number of different categories into which data points may fall (different outcomes)
3:1 ratio: n 2 df 1
9:3:3:1 ratio: n 4 df 3
(Figure 3.11)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.11
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.8: Probability Value (p)
When number of degrees of freedom is determined
2 value can be interpreted in terms of a corresponding probability value (p)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.9: Pedigree
Pedigree
Family tree with respect to given trait
Pedigree analysis reveals patterns of inheritance of human traits
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.12
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Figure 3.13
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.9: Pedigree Analysis
In human traits, extremely valuable tool in human genetic studies (Table 3.4)
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Table 3.4
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Section 3.10: Mutant Phenotypes Examined at Molecular Level
Mendel’s wrinkled peas: molecular explanation
SBEI: Starch-branching enzyme
Catalyzes formation of branched starch molecules as seed matures
Wrinkled peas lack this enzyme
Osmotic pressure rises wrinkled peas
© 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.