multinational companies
mari1001
GEB4891_Assignment1_GuidelinesRubric1.docGEB 4891 ASSIGNMENT 1 GUIDELINES & RUBRIC
Worth 50 Points
Due at end of Module 2
Assignment 1: Multinational Companies
Go to http://www.google.com and do a search on "multinational companies." Identify at least two companies in different industries that have entered into international agreements in other countries. In addition, describe what products or service they produce or sell in other countries. What challenges did this company face and how did they solve it?
Your paper should be at least two pages long excluding the cover and references page. It should be double-spaced, follow APA guidelines, and in a MS Word format file. You can learn more about the APA writing style at www.apa.org . Please use the rubric as a guide toward successful completion of this assignment.
Submission
Submit your assignment through the designated location in Blackboard under the “Course Content” tab, Module 2. Use a MS Word format file titled as follows: LastName_FirstName_PaperTitle For example: Smith_John_ Assignment 1
The Assignment 1 paper needs to be written in APA style. You can refer to APA style guide via this link: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ or from "Tools and Resources" link or at www.apa.org
Assignment paper format (minimum):
· Typeface: Times New Roman or Courier 12 pt.
· Double spacing
· Cover page
· Length: 2 pages of your writing
GRADING RUBRIC- A grading rubric is used to make grading as objective as possible. However there is some subjectivity in relation to grading.
Rubric Scores for the Assignment #1 – 50 Points
|
Description |
Exemplary |
Meets Expectations |
Developing |
Novice |
Below Expectation |
|
Content Max 20 points |
17-20 points All required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into the assignment at the highest level. All key facts are clearly identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are used in addition to the course text in a highly effective way. |
15-16 points All required elements are addressed and identified. Several key facts are identified and completely addressed. Where applicable, outside sources are effectively used in addition to the course text. |
13-14 points Required elements are addressed, but further elaboration is needed. A few key facts are identified and addressed. Outside sources are used in addition to the textbook, but are ineffective or not appropriate. |
1-12 points Few of the required elements are addressed. Little or no elaboration present. Key facts are NOT identified or addressed. No effort is made to include sources outside the course text(s) where applicable. |
0 point Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. |
|
Critical Thinking Max 20 points |
17-20 points Assignment demonstrates highest level of critical thinking. Integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies is at the highest level. Analysis and solutions are anchored in a solid and sophisticated premise using facts, not opinions. |
15-16 points Assignment demonstrates good critical thinking and integration of multiple ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are anchored in solid premise using facts, not opinions. |
13-14 points Assignment demonstrates some degree of critical thinking and integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions uses facts in some places, but other portions use opinion. |
1-12 points Assignment demonstrates almost no degree of critical thinking or integration of ideas and/or philosophies. Analysis and solutions are incomplete, missing or based on opinion. |
0 point Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. |
|
Quality of Work Max 10 points |
9-10 points The quality of writing is exceptional with no spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors; the work is very well-organized, well-developed and sequential; ideas are linked with smooth and effective transitions. |
8 points The quality of writing is very good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that do not interfere with comprehension; the work is well-organized, developed and mostly sequential; ideas are linked effectively. |
7 points The quality of writing is good with minor spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors that usually do not interfere with comprehension; the work is mostly organized, developed and sequential; ideas are adequately linked. |
6 points The quality of writing is unacceptable. A number of spelling, grammar, or mechanical errors significantly interfere with comprehension. the work is not organized or developed; ideas are presented randomly. |
0-5 points Assignment not submitted, submitted late OR contains plagiarized content. |
|
Cumulative Points |
45-50 points |
40-44 points |
35-39 points |
30-34 points |
0-29 points |
