Community teaching plan 2

Benchmark - Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation - Rubric Total 120 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Teaching Work Plan and

Provider Feedback

Provides Education to

Diverse Patient Population

(B)

Presentation Based on

Teaching Work Plan and

Provider Feedback

Presentation Provides

Individualized Education to

Diverse Patient Population in

Appropriate Community

Setting (C3.3)

0 points

Presentation does not

include individualized

education to a diverse

patient population in an

appropriate community

setting.

15.6 points

Presentation is incomplete.

Significant information for

the identified population is

omitted or unclear. Some

diverse attributes for that

population are presented;

not all attributes are relevant

to the population. The

presentation does not seem

appropriate for the health

care setting. There are major

inaccuracies. More

information is needed.

18 points

Presentation provides

general information for the

identified population. Some

diverse attributes for that

population are presented.

Presentation is appropriate

to the community setting

chosen. At least one health

care setting where this

individual education plan

could be used has been

proposed. There are some

inaccuracies. Minor detail or

rationale is needed for

support.

20.4 points

Presentation provides

information for the identified

population and includes

many diverse attributes for

that population. Presentation

is pertinent to the

community setting chosen.

Some additional health care

settings where this individual

education plan could be used

are proposed. Some detail is

needed for clarity.

24 points

Presentation provides

specific information that

focuses on the identified

population and includes all

diverse attributes for that

population. Presentation is

highly relevant to the

community setting chosen.

Additional health care

settings where this individual

education plan could be used

are identified and highly

relevant. The presentation

demonstrates insight into

providing individual

education to diverse patient

populations.

Presentation Based on

Teaching Work Plan and

Provider Feedback

Presentation Based on

Teaching Work Plan and

Provider Feedback

0 points

Presentation is not based on

a Teaching Work Plan.

15.6 points

Presentation partially based

on a Teaching Work Plan.

Documented provider

feedback is not integrated.

Major aspects are

incomplete. More

information is needed.

18 points

Presentation is generally

based on Teaching Work Plan

and any documented

provider feedback. Some

aspects are unclear. There

are minor inconsistencies

with Teaching Work Plan.

20.4 points

Presentation is based on

Teaching Work Plan and any

documented provider

feedback. All aspects are

generally consistent with

Teaching Work Plan.

24 points

Presentation is clearly based

on Teaching Work Plan and

any documented provider

feedback. All aspects are

consistent with Teaching

Work Plan.

Language Use and

Audience Awareness

(includes sentence

construction, word choice,

etc.)

Language Use and Audience

Awareness (includes

sentence construction, word

choice, etc.)

0 points

Inappropriate word choice

and lack of variety in

language use are evident.

Writer appears to be

unaware of audience. Use of

primer prose indicates writer

either does not apply figures

of speech or uses them

inappropriately.

3.9 points

Some distracting

inconsistencies in language

choice (register) or word

choice are present. The

writer exhibits some lack of

control in using figures of

speech appropriately.

4.5 points

Language is appropriate to

the targeted audience for the

most part.

5.1 points

The writer is clearly aware of

audience, uses a variety of

appropriate vocabulary for

the targeted audience, and

uses figures of speech to

communicate clearly.

6 points

The writer uses a variety of

sentence constructions,

figures of speech, and word

choice in distinctive and

creative ways that are

appropriate to purpose,

discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

Mechanics of Writing

(includes spelling,

punctuation, grammar,

language use)

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive

enough that they impede

communication of meaning.

3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors distract

the reader.

4.5 points

Some mechanical errors or

typos are present, but they

are not overly distracting to

the reader.

5.1 points

Slides are largely free of

mechanical errors, although

a few may be present.

6 points

Writer is clearly in control of

standard, written, academic

English.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear

point of view and logical

sequence of information.

Includes little persuasive

information. Sequencing of

ideas is unclear.

31.2 points

The content is vague in

conveying a point of view

and does not create a strong

sense of purpose. Includes

some persuasive

information.

36 points

The presentation slides are

generally competent, but

ideas may show some

inconsistency in organization

and/or in their relationships

to each other.

40.8 points

The content is written with a

logical progression of ideas

and supporting information

exhibiting a unity, coherence,

and cohesiveness. Includes

persuasive information from

reliable sources.

48 points

The content is written clearly

and concisely. Ideas

universally progress and

relate to each other. The

project includes motivating

questions and advanced

organizers. The project gives

the audience a clear sense of

the main idea.

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources

(citations, footnotes,

references, bibliography,

etc., as appropriate to

assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.9 points

Documentation of sources is

inconsistent or incorrect, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, with numerous

formatting errors.

4.5 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, although some

formatting errors may be

present.

5.1 points

Sources are documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is

mostly correct.

6 points

Sources are completely and

correctly documented, as

appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free

of error.

Layout

Layout

0 points

The layout is cluttered,

confusing, and does not use

spacing, headings, and

subheadings to enhance the

readability. The text is

extremely difficult to read

with long blocks of text,

small point size for fonts,

and inappropriate

contrasting colors. Poor use

of headings, subheadings,

indentations, or bold

formatting is evident.

3.9 points

The layout shows some

structure, but appears

cluttered and busy or

distracting with large gaps of

white space or a distracting

background. Overall

readability is difficult due to

lengthy paragraphs, too

many different fonts, dark or

busy background, overuse of

bold, or lack of appropriate

indentations of text.

4.5 points

The layout uses horizontal

and vertical white space

appropriately. Sometimes

the fonts are easy to read,

but in a few places the use of

fonts, italics, bold, long

paragraphs, color, or busy

background detracts and

does not enhance

readability.

5.1 points

The layout background and

text complement each other

and enable the content to be

easily read. The fonts are

easy to read and point size

varies appropriately for

headings and text.

6 points

The layout is visually pleasing

and contributes to the overall

message with appropriate

use of headings,

subheadings, and white

space. Text is appropriate in

length for the target

audience and to the point.

The background and colors

enhance the readability of

the text.