MiniCase 2

GBA 398 Mini Case Study Assignment Rubric

Name:

Students will complete the assignment with attention to the criteria below. Rating:

Exceptional corresponds to a grade of A- to A (90-100). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations. Section covered in a substantive way and critical thinking is evidenced. Arguments well supported / documented with research / facts. Proficient corresponds to a grade of B- to B+ (80-89%).Skills and standards are at the level of expectation. Most of the elements are covered (one may be missing), but not comprehensive. Some evidence of critical thinking present. Basic corresponds to a grade of C (70-79%). Skills and standards are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well. Multiple required sections / components missing. Minimal evidence of critical thinking and arguments are not well supported – mostly a summary of facts as opposed to using facts to support arguments. Insufficient corresponds to a grade of D (60 – 69%). Performance is weak; the skills or standards are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time. No critical thinking and many unsupported comments / arguments.

Elements

Criteria

Ratings

Max Points

Excepti onal

Profici ent

Basic Insuffici ent

Knowledge /Understanding Critical Thinking

Central theme developed that shows depth and understanding of the case study and business problem.

15

Reasoning is comprehensive, sound, compelling, and well supported.

15

Addressed key elements:

 Examined from proper knowledge perspective(s)

 Answered the main questions pertaining to the case

20

Critical thinking components applied in each of the key elements of the case.

15

Major points are stated clearly, supported with specific details, examples, or analysis, and are logically organized.

20

Other:

Writing

Grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure, etc. is appropriate

5

Minimum paper requirements (length, topic, research, integration of core values) are met

5

Introduction provides sufficient background and previews major points. Conclusion is logical, flows from the paper, and reviews major points.

5

Other:

Comments: