Who can write a research paper?
USem 103 A Sense of Purpose: Navigating the World
FUSE: Final USem Essay Scoring Guide
Argument : Is your argument focused & strong? ______ /60
|
Claim is unique, insightful, focused Balance of logos/pathos |
Claim is thought-provoking, focused |
Claim is clear, somewhat focused |
Claim is broad, all fact or all opinion |
|
Scope is defined through background, defined abstract terms |
|
Scope is left quite open |
|
|
Evidence is integrated with clear frames, authority and credibility Strong links to claim
|
Evidence is offered with some frames, some authority or credibility. Links to claim |
Evidence is offered but dropped in without frame, or few direct links to claim
|
Evidence is weak or absent; no ties to claim |
|
Author drives the argument |
|
Evidence drives the argument |
|
|
Evidence* is strong and credible (peer-reviewed/academic sources & gov. docs dominate the foundation of the argument) |
Evidence is strong and credible (peer-reviewed sources used, mixed with solid news and government documents) |
Evidence is mostly credible Some sources light or bias without acknowledgement |
Sources are pulled from pop culture, websites and news |
|
Thoughtfully offers a researched-based counter-perspective and a rebuttal/research-based response |
Acknowledges oppositional forces and addresses them with opposing research |
Acknowledges oppositional forces and addresses them |
Does not thoughtfully address oppositional forces |
|
Conclusion goes beyond simply restating the argument; it enlightens, illuminates and places the claim in a broader picture |
Conclusion places the claim in a broader picture and encourages further thought |
Conclusion attempts to place the claim in a broader picture |
Conclusion restates argument & evidence |
Information Literacy: did you use credible sources and honor them? ______/ 20
|
Used 3+ academic journals* |
Used 2+ academic journals |
Used 1 academic journal |
Used no academic journals |
|
Well-balanced and varied sources Relying on multiple different works and authors |
Mostly balanced and varied sources Relying on several different works and authors |
Somewhat balanced and varied sources Relying on a few different works and authors |
Unbalanced sources relying primarily on a single work or author |
|
All sources have MLA citations (direct quotes, paraphrases, images) |
|
|
Inconsistent in-text citations |
|
Writer provides strong, credible evidence to support the claim
|
Writer provides credible evidence to support the claim
|
Writer provides evidence to support the claim but credibility varies |
evidence does not directly support the claim OR offers suspicious evidence |
Academic Writing Techniques: Is your writing assertive, confident and authoritative? Did you consciously consider your reader? Are your sources strong? (0-2 points each) ______ / 20
_____ Complex ideas sheds new light on the topic
_____ Organization is clear, purposeful, and logically supports the overall argument
_____ Transitions between ideas & paragraphs are deliberate, meaningful and help guide the reader
_____ Evidence is offered with sophisticated frames for understanding
_____ Tone conveys confidence and authority (including credibility/credos, vocabulary, fluency, rhythm and effective
punctuation)
_____ Academic voice is sophisticated, precise and aware of the discourse community (no “I” or “you”; no jargon, &
abstract words are defined)
_____ Powerful & effective vocabulary choices
_____ Accurate conventions of standard written English; few, if any, distractions
Word Count: 1500-1750: ______