writing
Advanced Search
search
Discussion Reflections
From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider Thomas Bodenheimer and Christine Sinsky The Annals of Family Medicine November 2014, 12 (6) 573-576; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713
Article Figures & Data eLetters Info & Metrics
Abstract
The Triple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health,
and reducing costs—is widely accepted as a compass to optimize health
system performance. Yet physicians and other members of the health care
workforce report widespread burnout and dissatisfaction. Burnout is
associated with lower patient satisfaction, reduced health outcomes, and it
may increase costs. Burnout thus imperils the Triple Aim. This article
recommends that the Triple Aim be expanded to a Quadruple Aim, adding the
goal of improving the work life of health care providers, including clinicians
and staff.
In this issue
The Annals of Family Medicine: 12 (6) Vol. 12, Issue 6 November/December 2014 Table of Contents Index by author Back Matter (PDF) Front Matter (PDF) The Issue in Brief
Print Share
Home Current Issue Content
Info for About Engage Contact Careers
My alerts
Help
primary health care patient-centered care health care workforce
INTRODUCTION
Since Don Berwick and colleagues introduced the Triple Aim into the health
care lexicon, this concept has spread to all corners of the health care system.
The Triple Aim is an approach to optimizing health system performance,
proposing that health care institutions simultaneously pursue 3 dimensions of
performance: improving the health of populations, enhancing the patient
experience of care, and reducing the per capita cost of health care. The
primary Triple Aim goal is to improve the health of the population, with 2
secondary goals—improving patient experience and reducing costs—
contributing to the achievement of the primary goal.
In visiting primary care practices around the country, the authors have
repeatedly heard statements such as, “We have adopted the Triple Aim as our
framework, but the stressful work life of our clinicians and staff impacts our
ability to achieve the 3 aims.” These sentiments made us wonder, might there
be a fourth aim—improving the work life of health care clinicians and staff—
that, like the patient experience and cost reduction aims, must be achieved in
order to succeed in improving population health? Should the Triple Aim
become the Quadruple Aim?
RISING EXPECTATIONS OF PHYSICIANS AND PRACTICES
Society expects more and more of physicians and practices, particularly in
primary care. Patients want their health to be better, to be seen in a timely
fashion with empathy, and to enjoy a continuous relationship with a high-
quality clinician whom they choose. A patient-centered practice has been
described as, “They give me exactly the help I need and want exactly when I
1
2
3
Post
Like 11
Jump to section
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Get Permissions©
Article
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
RISING EXPECTATIONS OF PHYSICIANS AND PRACTICES
PHYSICIAN BURNOUT
STAFF BURNOUT
CARE TEAM WELL-BEING AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE TRIPLE AIM
ADDRESSING THE FOURTH AIM
CONCLUSION
Footnotes
REFERENCES
Figures & Data
eLetters
Info & Metrics
PubMed Google Scholar
Related Articles Related Articles
Cited By... Cited By...
More in this TOC Section More in this TOC Section
Help
need and want it.” Yet for primary care, society has not provided the
resources to meet these lofty benchmarks.
PHYSICIAN BURNOUT
The wide gap between societal expectations and professional reality has set
the stage for 46% of US physicians to experience symptoms of burnout.
Widespread across specialties, burnout is especially prevalent among
emergency department physicians, general internists, neurologists, and family
physicians. In a 2014 survey, 68% of family physicians and 73% of general
internists would not choose the same specialty if they could start their careers
anew. Professional burnout is characterized by loss of enthusiasm for work,
feelings of cynicism, and a low sense of personal accomplishment and is
associated with early retirement, alcohol use, and suicidal ideation.
According to a recent RAND Corporation survey, the principal driver of
physician satisfaction is the ability to provide quality care. Physician
dissatisfaction, therefore, is an early warning sign of a health care system
creating barriers to high-quality practice.
We have heard physicians making such statements as:
“The joy of practicing medicine is gone.”
“I hate being a doctor…I can’t wait to get out.”
“I can’t tell you how defeated I feel…The feeling of being
punished for delivering good care is nerve-racking.”
“I am no longer a physician but the data manager, data
entry clerk and steno girl… I became a doctor to take care
of patients. I have become the typist.”
4
5
6
5,7
7
Subjects
Keywords
primary health care, patient-centered care, health care workforce
Other research types:
Health policy
Professional practice
Other topics:
Organizational / practice change
Mindfulness and reflection
Possible emerging topic
Similar Articles Similar Articles
Help
In a 2011 national survey, 87% of physicians named the leading cause of
work-related stress and burnout as paperwork and administration, with 63%
indicating that stress is increasing. Forty-three percent of physicians
surveyed in 2014 reported spending over 30% of their day on administrative
tasks. Physicians spend more time on non–face-to-face activities (eg, letters,
in-box management, and medication refills) than with patients. Even when
in the exam room with patients, primary care physicians spend from 25% to
50% of the time attending to the computer. Between 2009 and 2010,
primary care physicians at a Veterans Affairs facility spent 49 minutes per day
responding to inbox-type alerts in addition to documentation of care provided.
One-half of such alerts have little clinical significance or could be handled by
other team members; 80% of the text in the alerts is unnecessary. The volume
of alerts and texts overshadows important information that requires action.
Moreover, the alerts create interruptions known to adversely affect patient
care.
A 2013 survey of 30 physician practices found that electronic health record
(EHR) technology has worsened professional satisfaction through time-
consuming data entry and interference with patient care. Emergency
medicine physicians spend 44% of their day doing data entry, with 4,000 EHR
clicks per day; only 28% of the day is spent with patients. In a 2011 survey,
over three-quarters of physicians reported that the EHR increases the time it
takes to plan, review, order, and document care.
STAFF BURNOUT
Burnout affects not only physicians, but also other members of the health care
workforce. Thirty-four percent of hospital nurses and 37% of nursing home
nurses report burnout, compared with 22% of nurses working in other
settings. On the front lines of practice, receptionists have a stressful job,
with 68% experiencing verbal abuse from patients. Most receptionists feel
8
9
10
11
12,13
7
14
15
16
17
Help
that physicians fail to appreciate the complexity of their work. Sources of
stress include finding appointments for patients and feeling caught between
doctors’ and patients’ demands. A 2013 survey of 508 employees working
for 243 health care employers found that 60% reported job burnout and 34%
planned to look for a different job. Complaints included heavy patient loads,
small staffs, and high stress levels.
Physician and staff dissatisfaction feed on each other. “It’s really rough to be
around a burned-out doctor. They’re cynical, sarcastic, and wonder, ‘what’s
the use anymore?’” It can go the other way, too. A burned-out staff member
may not be doing his or her job, resulting in more stress for the already
overworked doctor. Adequate numbers of well-trained, trusted, and capable
support staff with low turnover predict greater physician satisfaction.
CARE TEAM WELL-BEING AS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE TRIPLE AIM
Burnout among the health care workforce threatens patient-centeredness and
the Triple Aim. Dissatisfied physicians and nurses are associated with lower
patient satisfaction. Physician and care team burnout may contribute to
overuse of resources and thereby increased costs of care. Unhappy
physicians are more likely to leave their practice; the cost of family physician
turnover approaches $250,000 per physician. Dissatisfied physicians are
more likely to prescribe inappropriate medications which can result in
expensive complications.
Physician burnout is associated with reduced adherence to treatment plans,
resulting in negatively affected clinical outcomes. Burnout also leads to
lower levels of empathy, which is associated with worsened clinical outcomes
for patients with diabetes. Patient safety is threatened by nurse
dissatisfaction; many nurses report that their workload causes them to miss
important changes in their patients’ condition. Dissatisfied physicians are 2
to 3 times more likely to leave practice, thereby exacerbating the growing
18
19
20
7
16,21
22–24
25
26
27
28
16
Help
shortage of primary care physicians and complicating the achievement of a
healthy population.
Practices working toward the Triple Aim may increase physician burnout and
thereby reduce their chances of success. Higher scores on a patient-centered
medical home assessment may be associated with greater clinician burnout in
safety-net clinics. More EHR functionalities—email with patients, physician
order entry, alerts and reminders—intended to promote the Triple Aim are
associated with more burnout and intent to leave practice.
Group Health Cooperative implemented primary care reforms in the early
2000s aimed at improving Triple Aim performance. The unintended
consequence was increased physician burnout and resultant quality
reductions and cost increases. In 2006, Group Health changed direction,
focusing first on clinician work life by increasing visit length and reducing
panel size. Burnout dropped substantially with significant gains in clinical
quality, patient experience, and cost reduction. The Group Health story
demonstrates that without addressing the work life of those providing care,
Triple Aim measures are likely to worsen.
ADDRESSING THE FOURTH AIM
How can health care organizations work toward the fourth aim, improving the
work life of clinicians and staff? For primary care physicians the following list
suggests some practical steps:
Implement team documentation: nurses, medical assistants, or other staff, present during the patient visit, entering some or all documentation into the EHR, assisting with order entry, prescription processing, and charge capture. Team documentation has been associated with greater physician and staff satisfaction, improved revenues, and the capacity of the team to manage a larger panel of patients while going home earlier.
29
30
31
32
33,34
Help
Use pre-visit planning and pre-appointment laboratory testing to reduce time wasted on the review and follow-up of laboratory results
Expand roles allowing nurses and medical assistants to assume responsibility for preventive care and chronic care health coaching under physician-written standing orders
Standardize and synchronize workflows for prescription refills, an approach which can save physicians 5 hours per week while providing better care
Co-locate teams so that physicians work in the same space as their team members; this has been shown to increase efficiency and save 30 minutes of physician time per day
To avoid shifting burnout from physicians to practice staff, ensure that staff who assume new responsibilities are well-trained and understand that they are contributing to the health of their patients and that unnecessary work is reengineered out of the practice
In the longer run, to address the chasm between society’s expectations and
primary care’s capacity, more financial and personnel resources should be
dedicated to primary care. One study estimates that a 59% increase in
staffing, to 4.25 FTE staff per physician, is needed to achieve the patient-
centered medical home.
Patient-centeredness and the Fourth Aim
The barriers to achieving the Triple Aim include improving population health in
a society experiencing obesity and diabetes epidemics and growing income
disparities, rising health care costs, and a dispirited and disengaged health
care workforce. If the gap continues to widen between society’s expectations
for primary care and primary care’s available resources, the feelings of
betrayal and the wearing down from daily stress voiced by primary care
practitioners will grow. The negative impact on patient-centered care will be
deep and long lasting. On the other hand, if an emphasis on the workforce
comes at the expense of patients’ needs, this focus could have negative
35
33,36
37
38
2,39
40
Help
consequences. Health care is a relationship between those who provide care
and those who seek care, a relationship that can only thrive if it is symbiotic,
benefiting both parties.
CONCLUSION
The Triple Aim has provided society with a compass, pointing the way forward
for our health care system. The positive engagement, rather than the negative
frustration, of the health care workforce is of paramount importance in
achieving the primary goal of the Triple Aim—improving population health.
Leaders and providers of health care should consider adding a fourth
dimension—improving the work life of those who deliver care—to the
compass points of better care, better health, and lower costs.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: authors report none.
Received for publication May 10, 2014.
Revision received August 15, 2014.
Accepted for publication September 2, 2014.
© 2014 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
REFERENCES
1. ↵Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The Triple Aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2008;27(3):759–769. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
2. ↵Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, Sinsky TA, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med . 2013;11(3): 272–278. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
Help
3. ↵Detsky AS. What patients really want from health care. JAMA . 2011; 306(22):2500– 2501. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
4. ↵Berwick DM. What ‘patient-centered’ should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2009;28(4):w555–w565. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
5. ↵Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med . 2012;172(18):1377–1385. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
6. ↵Kane L, Peckham C. Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2014. http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/compensation/2014/public/overview#24. accessed Jul 15, 2014. Google Scholar
7. ↵Friedberg MW, Chen PG, Van Busum KR, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems and health policy. Rand Corporation 2013. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR400/RR439/RAND_RR439.pdf. Accessed Jul 15, 2014. Google Scholar
8. ↵2011 Physician Stress and Burnout Survey. Physician Wellness Services and Cejka Search . http://www.cejkasearch.com/wp-content/uploads/physician-stress-burnout- survey.pdf. Accessed Jul 15, 2014. Google Scholar
9. ↵The Second Annual Practice Profitability Index . 2014 Edition. Care-Cloud. http://on.carecloud.com/rs/carecloud/images/PPI-Report.pdf. Accessed Aug 14, 2014. Google Scholar
10. ↵Arndt B, Tuan W-J, White J, Schumacher J. Panel workload assessment in US primary care: accounting for non-face-to-face panel management activities. J Am Board Fam Med . 2014;27(4):530–537. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
11. ↵Montague E, Asan O. Physician interactions with electronic health records in primary care. Health Syst (Basingstoke) . 2012;1(2):96–103. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
12. ↵Murphy DR, Reis B, Sittig DF, Singh H. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med . 2012;125(2):209.e1–209.e7. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Help
13. ↵Murphy DR, Reis B, Kadiyala H, et al. Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med . 2012;172(3):283–285. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
14. ↵Hill RG Jr., Sears LM, Melanson SW. 4000 clicks: a productivity analysis of electronic medical records in a community hospital ED. Am J Emerg Med . 2013;31(11):1591– 1594. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
15. ↵Jamoom E, Patel V, King J, Furukawa MF. Physician experience with electronic health record systems that meet meaningful use criteria: NAMCS Physician Workflow Survey, 2011 . NCHS data brief, no 129. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013. Google Scholar
16. ↵McHugh MD, Kutney-Lee A, Cimiotti JP, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. Nurses’ widespread job dissatisfaction, burnout, and frustration with health benefits signal problems for patient care. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2011;30(2):202–210. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
17. ↵Dixon CAJ, Tompkins CNE, Allgar VL, Wright NMJ. Abusive behaviour experienced by primary care receptionists: a cross-sectional survey. Fam Pract . 2004;21(2):137– 139. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
18. ↵Eisner M, Britten N. What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work? Br J Gen Pract . 1999;49(439):103–106. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
19. ↵CareerBuilder press release, April 30, 2013. More than one third of employed health care workers plan to look for a new job this year . http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressreleases.aspx. Accessed May 1, 2014. Google Scholar
20. ↵Caffarini K. How to help medical practice staff avoid burnout. Am Med News . June 10, 2013. http://www.amednews.com/article/20130610/business/130619992/5/. Google Scholar
21. ↵Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med . 2000;15(2):122–128. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
22. ↵Kushnir T, Greenberg D, Madjar N, Hadari I, Yermiahu Y, Bachner YG. Is burnout associated with referral rates among primary care physicians in community clinics? Fam Pract . 2014;31(1):44–50. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
Help
23. Bachman KH, Freeborn DK. HMO physicians’ use of referrals. Soc Sci Med . 1999;48(4):547–557. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
24. ↵Sirovich BE, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Too Little? Too Much? Primary care physicians’ views on US health care: a brief report. Arch Intern Med . 2011;171(17):1582–1585. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
25. ↵Buchbinder SB, Wilson M, Melick CF, Powe NR. Primary care physician job satisfaction and turnover. Am J Manag Care . 2001;7(7): 701–713. PubMed Google Scholar
26. ↵Williams ES, Skinner AC. Outcomes of physician job satisfaction: Williams ES, Skinner AC. Outcomes of physician job satisfaction: a narrative review, implications, and directions for future research. Health Care Manage Rev . 2003;28(2):119– 139. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
27. ↵DiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol . 1993;12(2):93–102. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
28. ↵Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med . 2011;86(3):359– 364. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
29. ↵Spinelli WM. The phantom limb of the triple aim. Mayo Clin Proc . 2013;88(12):1356– 1357. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
30. ↵Lewis SE, Nocon RS, Tang H, et al. Patient-centered medical home characteristics and staff morale in safety net clinics. Arch Intern Med . 2012;172(1):23–31. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
31. ↵Babbott S, Manwell LB, Brown R, et al. Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc . 2014;21(e1):e100–e106. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
32. ↵Reid RJ, Coleman K, Johnson EA, et al. The Group Health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2010;29(5):835–843. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
33. ↵Bodenheimer T, Willard-Grace R, Ghorob A. Expanding the roles of medical assistants: who does what in primary care? JAMA Intern Med . 2014;174(7):1025–
Help
Previous Next
1026. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
34. ↵Reuben DB, Knudsen J, Senelick W, Glazier E, Koretz BK. The effect of a physician partner program on physician efficiency and patient satisfaction. JAMA Intern Med . 2014;174(7):1190–1193. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
35. ↵Sinsky CA, Sinsky TA. Test result follow-up: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med . 2013;28(2):174. CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
36. ↵Bodenheimer TS, Smith MD. Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2013;32(11):1881– 1886. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
37. ↵Sinsky TA, Sinsky CA. A streamlined approach to prescription management. Fam Pract Manag . 2012;19(6):11–13. PubMed Google Scholar
38. ↵Shipman SA, Sinsky CA. Expanding primary care capacity by reducing waste and improving the efficiency of care. Health Aff (Millwood) . 2013;32(11):1990– 1997. Abstract/FREE Full Text Google Scholar
39. ↵Willard R, Bodenheimer T. The building blocks of high-performing primary care: lessons from the field. California HealthCare Foundation , 2012. http://www.chcf.org/publications/2012/04/building-blocks-primary- care. Google Scholar
40. ↵Patel MS, Arron MJ, Sinsky TA, et al. Estimating the staffing infrastructure for a patient-centered medical home. Am J Manag Care . 2013;19(6):509–516. PubMed Google Scholar
Back to top
Content
Current Issue
Past Issues
Early Access
Info for
Authors
Reviewers
Job Seekers
Engage
E-mail Alerts
e-Letters (Comments)
RSS
About
About Us
Editorial Board & Staff
Sponsoring Organizations
Help
Plain-Language Summaries
Multimedia
Podcast
Articles by Type
Articles by Subject
Supplements
Calls for Papers
Media Journal Club
Submit a Manuscript
Subscribe
Family Medicine Careers
Copyrights & Permissions
Contact Us
eLetter/Comments Policy
© 2025 Annals of Family Medicine
Help