book review responses

2

Book Review: Connecting with Young People in Trouble: Risk, Relationships and Lived Experience

Publisher: Waterside Press Ltd

Author: Andi Brierley

Assignment #1

Relational Justice and Lived Experience in Youth Justice: A Review of Connecting with Young People in Trouble

Andi Brierley’s Connecting with Young People in Trouble: Risk, Relationships and Lived Experience (2021) offers a sharp, practice-grounded reflection on how youth justice systems respond to children in conflict with the law. Rather than treating young people as bundles of “risk factors” to be managed, Brierley argues that meaningful change depends on the quality of the relationships that surround them. He writes as someone who has been both a young person in custody and a practitioner working with children in similar situations, which gives the book a distinctive voice in criminal justice literature.

This review provides a brief overview of the book before turning to critical analysis. It considers how Brierley’s arguments contribute to broader debates in criminal justice, how well the work reflects current scholarship, and what value it has for contemporary leadership and practice in youth justice.

Summary of the Book

Connecting with Young People in Trouble is structured around a tension between “risk” and “relationship.” Brierley describes how modern youth justice practice is dominated by assessment tools, breach procedures, and performance targets. Children are regularly discussed as “cases” with risk scores and vulnerability ratings, rather than as developing human beings with histories of loss, trauma, and exploitation. Against this backdrop, he offers a series of stories drawn from his childhood and professional experience to show how formal processes can easily overwhelm the simple act of being present and listening.

A central idea in the book is what Brierley calls the “risk–relationship paradox.” When agencies focus narrowly on measuring and managing risk, they can erode the very relationships that might reduce it over time. Young people who feel constantly monitored and judged may disengage, go missing, or escalate their behavior, which then justifies more enforcement. To counter this cycle, Brierley proposes an approach summarized by the acronym PACT: presence, attunement, connection, and trust. He argues that when adults show up consistently, respond with emotional understanding, and communicate belief in a young person’s potential, there is more space for honest conversation and gradual change.

Critical Contribution to Criminal Justice Literature

Within the wider criminal justice field, Brierley’s work aligns with the “relational turn” in youth justice. Research on desistance and relationship-based practice has repeatedly shown that sustained, respectful relationships are central to long-term change, but those ideas often remain in academic texts. Brierley’s main contribution is to translate this body of work into concrete practice language. The Risk–Relationship Paradox gives leaders and practitioners a simple way to think about the unintended consequences of risk-driven systems: policies that look protective on paper can be damaging if they consistently undermine trust.

The PACT framework also has practical and theoretical value. It does not claim to be a full theory of offending, but it provides a clear description of what good practice should feel like to a child: someone is reliably there, pays attention to how they are coping, stays connected even when behavior is difficult, and slowly earns trust. In this sense, PACT complements more formal desistance theories by highlighting the everyday relational work that must happen if any program or intervention is to be effective.

Author Credibility, Sources, and Methodological Approach

Brierley’s credibility rests on his combined lived experience and professional background. He writes openly about his time in care and in prison and about later roles in youth offending services and higher education. That dual vantage point allows him to describe the emotional reality of being a teenager in custody while also understanding policy pressures, inspection frameworks, and organizational routines. For many readers, this blend of perspectives may be more persuasive than a purely academic account, because it speaks directly to what practice feels like on the ground.

From a methodological perspective, we should view the book as reflective practice rather than empirical research. Brierley uses personal narrative and anonymized case vignettes, supported by selective reference to trauma, adverse childhood experiences, and relationship-based social work. He does not attempt a comprehensive literature review or a systematic study. This means the text should not be evaluated against the standards applied to formal research monographs. Instead, its value lies in how effectively it distills and applies existing scholarship to real-world practice with young people in trouble.

Relevance to Contemporary Issues and Leadership Challenges

The themes in Connecting with Young People in Trouble are highly relevant to contemporary youth justice. Across many jurisdictions, services are under pressure to show measurable results, respond to serious incidents, and satisfy inspection bodies, all while working with children whose lives are shaped by poverty, exploitation, and trauma. Brierley’s critique invites leaders to ask whether their agencies genuinely support relational work or mainly reward throughput, compliance, and rapid enforcement.

For criminal justice administrators, the book is a useful mirror. It highlights how seemingly technical decisions—such as contact requirements, office layouts, and the tone of written reports—can communicate either care or control. For example, insistence on rigid appointment times in formal offices may be experienced by young people as surveillance rather than support, particularly if staff do not have time to visit homes, schools, or community spaces. Brierley's focus on presence and attunement implies that leadership should safeguard time for relationship cultivation and promote reflective supervision, rather than merely enforcing the achievement of objectives.

The book also has implications for interagency work. Many of the young people Brierley describes are known to social care, schools, police, and health services. When each agency focuses on its own risk assessments and recording requirements, children can become overwhelmed by professionals who collect information but do not share a coherent plan or consistent relationship. For leaders, this raises questions about how partnership arrangements, information sharing, and joint training can be shaped to support a more unified, relationship-centered response.

Limitations and Areas for Further Reflection

Although Connecting with Young People in Trouble is rich in practical insight, it does have limitations. Some important themes, such as structural racism, gender, disability, and immigration status, are acknowledged but not explored in depth. In reality, these factors often influence which children are labelled as “risky,” how behavior is interpreted, and whose safety is prioritized. A more detailed discussion of these issues would have strengthened the book’s analysis of power and inequality.

In addition, the focus on relationships can sometimes appear to underplay the genuine dilemmas practitioners face when public protection concerns are high. Situations involving serious violence or weapons may require rapid enforcement actions, even when relationships are strong. Brierley recognizes this in places, but the balance between care and control could have been examined more explicitly, particularly for readers in senior leadership roles who must justify decisions to courts, inspectors, and the public.

Conclusion

Overall, Connecting with Young People in Trouble is a thoughtful and accessible contribution to youth justice literature. It does not aim to be a technical manual or a research study; instead, it functions as a reflective practice text that brings together lived experience, professional insight, and key themes from contemporary scholarship. Its central message—that relationships are not an optional extra but the core of effective youth justice—is highly relevant for today’s criminal justice leaders.

For students and practitioners, the book offers a clear challenge: to look beyond procedures and ask whether everyday practice genuinely communicates presence, attunement, connection, and trust. For administrators and managers, it raises uncomfortable but necessary questions about how organizational structures either support or undermine relational work. In that sense, Brierley’s book does more than describe young people in trouble; it asks what kind of justice system they encounter and what kind of leadership is required to offer them a credible chance of change.

References

Brierley, A. (2021). Connecting with Young People in Trouble: Risk, Relationships and Lived Experience. Waterside Press.