peter
Completing a research proposal demonstrate the skills which will be necessary to conduct research for the dissertation. Crafting a proposal helps to consolidate the students’ understanding of the research principles addressed in the module, including:
· Critical engagement with the principles of educational research
· The positionality of the researcher
· Critical appraisal of educational policy and practice
1. Students will be provided with a proposal framework which they will use to outline what the proposed research is about; what it is trying to find out or achieve and how it will go about doing that.
2. The process of developing the research proposal will involve planning, designing and setting up the research, including placing it in context and connecting it to relevant literature.
3. The proposal must be specifically linked to the students’ intended dissertation topic.
THIS IS THE FORMAT OF THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL 3000 words
Please the Methodology section should have lots of academic references at all times because it’s part of a master’s program requirements There should also be sub-research questions included. We need about 20 references. Harvard style
Extracts from a research proposal
Research title
This will be a working title which is best worded as a question which should be in two parts, the first part is a statement of the topic and the second part is the research question
Professional identity and professionalism in prison education: are prison educators’ perceptions of their professional identity influenced by the policies and politics of the penal system?
Abstract
This is an overview of the contents of the proposal and should be 100-150 words. Imagine that you have to describe your research to someone in 30 seconds.
The propose research will be an investigation into professional identity and professionalism in an educational organisation and whether this is affected by policies and organisational politics. The research will focus on a specific groups of educators who are teaching in a prison education department in the north of England. It is proposed that the research will be undertaken by gathering data via in-depth semi-structured interviews with prison educators. The data will be then be analysed using a thematic narrative approach. My current role as an insider-researcher gives me access to potential participants but also presents ethical issues regarding confidentiality and anonymity. These issues have been considered and possible solutions identified.
Introduction
This section introduces the research area/topic and briefly states the aims of the research, the rationale for the research and the main research question and sub questions, which can be a bullet point list.
The aim of the research is to investigate the perceptions of a group of prison educators of their professional identity and what, if any, influence the policies and politics of the penal system may have on those perceptions. The issues that are faced by the prison education workforce are not widely known, as prison education is hidden from public view. Its purpose remains not only a mystery to outsiders, but often also to those responsible for its management and those employed to deliver it.
Conceptualisation
This section is where you define the key concepts that are part of your research, you can also include references to the key theories in this section.
The concepts of professional as an occupational category, professionalism as the process by which individuals become professionals and professionalisation as 'the process by which occupations become professions' (Millerson, 1964: 10) originated in profession discourse. The research will use Foucault’s (1969:1972) theory of discourse and discursive formation to trace the historical development of profession discourse. To examine the early concepts of ‘professional’ and ‘professionalism’ it will use the works of Spencer (1896), Tawney (1921) and Flexner (1915).
Professional Context
This section is relevant if the research is related to your professional practice as a practitioner, for example as a teacher or a manager in a setting or as a volunteer. In this section you can refer to yourself as I, if this section is not relevant to your research then do not include it.
I began my teaching career in 2000, when I was employed by the local adult education (AE) service to teach maths in a local prison education department. My current position is …..
Organisational Context
This section is relevant if the research is related to, or being carried out in a specific organisation, e.g. a school or college. You should include a brief description of the setting, without naming it, and what its purpose is, if this section is not relevant to your research then do not include it.
The research will be taking place in a male local prison in the north of England. The research location has recently undergone a number of changes that have impacted on educators and their managers. For example, the capacity of the prison was recently expanded by 40% with the building of four new wings and an extension to the existing facilities, including new classrooms.
Policy Context
This section is relevant if the research is related to a specific policy or group of policies which can be cited. If this section is not relevant to your research then do not include it.
The prison education workforce are bound by three sets of policies, those applying to FE, those applying specifically to prison education and those applying to the prison service. The recommendations of the review, Unlocking Potential: A review of education in prisons (2016) were that prison education should include more personal and social development (PSD) courses and more arts, music and sports activities alongside the basics of maths and English.
Methodology
This is the section where you outline the philosophical approach that the research will take along with the methods and data collection strategies that will be used. You also need to include details of who the participants will be, how they will be chosen and why as well as considering some of the limitations of the research and the ethical aspects of the research. This might include your positionality and/or role as an insider-researcher. Each of these research decisions will, be dealt with quite briefly in order to stay within the word limit but each one needs to be justified with references to research theory and practice that are to be found in research texts. Subheadings can be used, as in the example below, to give structure to this section but are not compulsory.
Philosophical basis of the research
The epistemological approach of the research will be interpretivist as it concerned with the ….. The research will adopted a constructivist ontological position, as the …..
Method
The most appropriate method to adopt for this research will be qualitative as this …
Approach
The participants will be …. The data will be collected through semi-structured interviews because… Reliability and validity will be ensured by ….
Limitations
The results may not be generalizable because…
Ethical issues
Ethical considerations will include….
References
This is a list of all the texts and sources that you have cited in the proposal, it must conform to the University of Hull guidelines provided on Canvas
THIS IS THE FORMAT FOR THE RESEARCH PORTFOLIO 2000 words
The portfolio will contain:
· An evaluation of the students’ research skills using the RDF framework with targets set
· Evidence of how the targets have been/are being met
· A reflection on the student’s positionality
· A completed draft ethics form
MY PORTFOLIO DETAILS
Learning & Skills Scoring guide
This is a checklist to indicate my skills at the beginning of my master’s program
1: not confident (not really sure about the requirements at Master’s level)
2: not that confident (but do have some understanding of the requirements at Master’s level)
3: reasonably confident (understand the requirements expected at this level)
4: very confident (understand and can show evidence of ability to meet requirements at this level)
5: higly confident (understand and can show clear evidence of competence at Master’s level)
|
THE FOUR DOMAINS |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Domain A; Knowledge and Intellectual Abilities A1; Knowledge Base Subject Knowledge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Information Literacy and Management |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Information Literacy and Management |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Information seeking |
|
· |
|
|
|
|
· Information Literacy and Management |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Academic Literacy and numeracy |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
A1 2; Cognitive abilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Analysing |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· Synthesizing |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Critical thinking |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Evaluating |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Problem-solving |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· A1 3; Creativity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Inquiring mind |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Intellectual insight |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Innovation |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· Argument Construction |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Intellectual Risk |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
Domain B; Personal Effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
· B2 – Self management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Preparation and prioritisation |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Commitement to Research |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· Time Management |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Responsivenes to Change |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· Work-Life Balance |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Domain C; Research Governance and Organisation |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· D1; Working with others |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· Collegiality |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
· Team working |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
People Management · |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Supervision
|
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Mentoring · |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
Influence and leadership · |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Collaboration · |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
Equality and Diversity · |
|
|
|
· |
|
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
RESEARCHER DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN
|
ACTION |
Priority-High/medium/Low |
Status- Not started/In progress/Complete |
Start |
End |
NOTE |
EVIDENCE |
|
Goal #1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be able to understand the subject matter -postgraduate research skills |
Medium |
In progress |
September 2021 |
October 2021 |
|
|
|
Goal#2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be able to understand and use in my research data analysis |
Low |
In progress |
December 2021 |
September 2022 |
|
|
|
Goal #3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be able to understand and use self-management in carry out my research |
Medium |
In progress |
December 2021 |
September 2022 |
|
|
|
Goal #4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be able to understand research management and apply it in my research work |
Medium |
In progress |
December 2021 |
September 2022 |
|
|
|
Goal #5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be able to understand how to work with teams |
Medium |
In progress |
December 2021 |
September 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reflection on your Researcher Positionality
When you have completed this reflective exercise, you should add it to your Research Skills portfolio.
Questions: How is what you see shaped by where YOU stand? What factors or aspects of your identity do you feel might play a part in determining your research topic and how you will carry out your research? Do you feel that your research is influenced by any of the factors listed below? To help you think about this here is video on positionality, it is based on American research but it does make some good points https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9wVgU9Ppk8
|
Factor |
How might this influence your research? |
How will you account for this in your research? |
|
GENDER
|
|
|
|
AGE
|
|
|
|
RACE/ETHNICITY
|
|
|
|
SOCIAL CLASS
|
|
|
|
SHARED COMMUNITY/INSIDER-RESEARCHER
|
|
|
|
EDUCATION
|
|
|
|
JOB ROLE/PROFESSIONAL STATUS
|
|
|
|
ANY OTHER FACTORS YOU CAN IDENTIFY
|
|
|
https://weingartenlrc.wordpress.com/2017/01/09/research-writing-whats-your-positionality/
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss33/3/
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-981-10-2779-6_35-1
DRAFTED ETHICS FORM
FACE Ethics - FD, UG & PGT Short Form (Involving human participants, subjects or material)
|
PART A: SUMMARY |
|
A.1 Title of the research
|
||||||||
|
A.2 Principal investigator’s details |
||||||||
|
First Name |
Justina |
|||||||
|
Last name |
Aigbona |
|||||||
|
A3. Student number (NOT YOUR log-in number) |
|
|||||||
|
A4. Supervisor’s name |
Your supervisor will be allocated in Trimester 2 |
|||||||
|
A5. School/Department |
School of Education |
|||||||
|
A6. Your student email address |
J.AGBONA-2021!hull.ac.uk |
|||||||
|
A7. Qualification working towards e.g. BA(Hons) or Masters |
|
|||||||
|
PART B: HUMAN PARTICIPANTS AND SUBJECTS |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
B1. Select from the list below to describe your research: (Tick/highlight as appropriate)
|
|
B2. Are the participants expected to be from any of the following groups? (Tick/highlight as appropriate)
|
||||||||
|
Does your research require you to have a DBS check? Yes/no (delete as appropriate) If yes, please provide further information on how/when this will be obtained
What are the potential benefits and/ or risks for research participants in both the short and medium-term?
What will be done to minimise any identified risks?
|
||||||||
|
B.3 Is there a potential for criminal or other disclosures to the researcher requiring action to take place during the research? (e.g. during interviews/group discussions, or use of screen tests for drugs?)
Yes/no (delete as appropriate)
If yes how these will be addressed:
|
||||||||
|
B.4 Will your research require participants to complete surveys or answer questions (e.g. interviews?) participants be asked to do in the study?
If yes, then please provide a draft list of questions
|
||||||||
|
PART C: RECRUITMENT & CONSENT PROCESSES Describe how potential participants in the study will be identified and recruited and who will do this. How participants are approached and recruited is an important consideration to ensure that they are not induced or coerced into participation. The way participants are identified may have a bearing on whether the results can be generalised. Please explain each point and give sub-groups of participants separately if appropriate. also say who will identify, approach and recruit participants. Remember too to append all advertising material (posters, emails etc) as part of your application. |
|
C.1 Describe how potential participants in the study be identified, approached and recruited and who will do this: (i) identified:
(ii) approached: (i.e. how will you tell prospective participants about the research and invite them to participate? Also, will you speak to them face to face or use email or telephone?) It may be appropriate to approach participants and ask them to sign up on the spot for low risk research; however, giving participants a length of time (at least a week) to consider is usually necessary for riskier projects. *
(iii) recruited: (i.e. how will participants sign up to be participants in the research? e.g. through returning a signed consent for to the researcher) *
|
|
C2. Will the research involve any element of deception?
Yes/no (delete as appropriate)
If yes, please describe why this is necessary and whether participants will be informed at the end of the study.
|
|
C3. Will informed consent be obtained from the research participants?
Yes/no (delete as appropriate)
If yes, please describe in detail how this will be done, also provide a copy of the consent form template to be used in your research
|
|
Copies of any written consent form, written information and all other explanatory material should accompany this application . The information sheet should make explicit that participants can withdraw from the research at any time, if the research design permits.
|
|
C4. Describe whether participants will be able to withdraw from the study, and up to what point (e.g. if data is to be anonymised). If withdrawal is not possible, explain why not. Any limits to withdrawal, e.g. once the results have been written up or published, should be made clear to participants in advance, preferably by specifying a date after which withdrawal would not be possible. Make sure that the information provided to participants (e.g. information sheets, consent forms) is consistent
|
|
C5. Will individual or group interviews/ questionnaires discuss any topics or issues that might be sensitive, embarrassing or upsetting, or is it possible that criminal or other disclosures requiring action could take place during the study (e.g. during interviews or group discussions)? The information sheet should explain under what circumstances action may be taken.
Yes/no (delete as appropriate)
If yes, give details of procedures in place to deal with these issues.
|
|
PART D: RESEARCH DATA (Researchers must comply with the General Data Protection Regulations) |
|
D.1 Where will your data be stored? (please tick/highlight more than one if applicable)
University approved cloud computing services (e.g. UoH Box)
University networks (e.g. shared drives)
External cloud services (personal Box, Google drive etc.)
Portable drive (Not recommended)
Manual files (e.g. paper copies)
Private company computers
Personal computers
Other
|
||||||
|
D2. How will you ensure personal data on consent forms (e.g. names, addresses) will be stored securely and disposed of when the study is complete?
Nobody other than the researcher should have access to these. If consent forms cannot be digitalised and encrypted, they must be secured in a locked cabinet or room to which only the researcher has access. Ensure you do not put any words, letters, images or numbers on the consent forms which could potentially link the person to the data you have collected. |
||||||
|
D3. Where will the data generated by the research be analysed and by whom?
|
||||||
|
D4. Who will have access and act as long-term custodian for the research data generated by the study?
|
||||||
|
D5. DATA SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES - Will the research involve any of the following activities at any stage (including identification of potential research participants)? (Tick/highlight all that apply)
|
||||||
|
D6. How long will research data from the study be stored?
|
||||||
|
D7. When will the personal data collected during the study be destroyed and how?
|
||||||
|
Researchers must comply with the General Data Protection Regulations that are live from May 2018. |
||||||
|
PART E: DECLARATIONS |
|
Declaration by Principal Investigator
1 The information provided in this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. 2. I take full responsibility for the information I have supplied in this application 3. I undertake to abide by the University’s ethical and health and safety guidelines, and the ethical principles underlying good practice guidelines appropriate to my discipline. 4. I will seek the relevant School Risk assessment/COSHH approval if required. 5. If the research is approved, I undertake to adhere to the project protocol, the terms of this application and any conditions set out by the Faculty Research Ethics Committee. 6. Before implementing substantial amendments to the protocol, I will submit an amendment request to the Faculty Research Ethics Committee seeking approval. 7. If requested, I will submit progress reports. 8. I am aware of my responsibility to be up to date and comply with the requirements of the law and relevant guidelines relating to security and confidentiality of participants and other personal data 9. I understand that research records/data may be subject to inspection for audit purposes 10. I take full responsibility for the actions of the research team and individuals supporting this study, thus all those involved will be given training relevant to their role in the study. 11. By signing the validation I agree that the Faculty Research Ethics Committee, on behalf of the University of Hull, will hold personal data in this application and this will be managed according to the principles established in the Data protection Act (2018).
Principal Investigator
Signature of Principal Investigator:
Date/Time: Declaration by Principal Investigator
1 The information provided in this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. 2. I take full responsibility for the information I have supplied in this application 3. I undertake to abide by the University’s ethical and health and safety guidelines, and the ethical principles underlying good practice guidelines appropriate to my discipline. 4. I will seek the relevant School Risk assessment/COSHH approval if required. 5. If the research is approved, I undertake to adhere to the project protocol, the terms of this application and any conditions set out by the Faculty Research Ethics Committee. 6. Before implementing substantial amendments to the protocol, I will submit an amendment request to the Faculty Research Ethics Committee seeking approval. 7. If requested, I will submit progress reports. 8. I am aware of my responsibility to be up to date and comply with the requirements of the law and relevant guidelines relating to security and confidentiality of participants and other personal data 9. I understand that research records/data may be subject to inspection for audit purposes 10. I take full responsibility for the actions of the research team and individuals supporting this study, thus all those involved will be given training relevant to their role in the study. 11. By signing the validation I agree that the Faculty Research Ethics Committee, on behalf of the University of Hull, will hold personal data in this application and this will be managed according to the principles established in the Data protection Act (2018).
Principal Investigator
Signature of Principal Investigator:
Date/Time:
|
When completing your online version, the completed form will then be submitted by clicking on SUBMIT FORM button.
NOTE BELOW
Please fill in those boxes and write a summary of a note at the end of each section A total of 2000 words. We have four sections here
For the space of Evidence. We are to write the certificate we have obtained to improve on our skills and attach the certificates at the end of the portfolio. which I have done four courses on the open university and I was given a certificate on the following courses
and you can also attach any relevant sources you might be aware of
MY CERTIFICATE COURSES OBTAINED ARE;
1 Creative writing and critical reading
2 Conversation and Interview
3 Extending and developing your thinking skills
4 How to be a Critical Reader
5 Working in groups and teams
For the learning and scoring skills, I have scored myself, you are to write a note under it
For the development action plan, I have input some goals I want to attain, then you are to fill the rest part and make a summary under it
For the positionality, you are to fill it up and make a summary note under it
For the drafted ethics form, you’re to fill it and make a summary under it.
For reference, you can add only when necessary
Thanks