Formal paper part 2
alexmartin
Formalpaperpart2rubric.docFormal paper part 2 rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze, synthesize, and discuss the pros and cons for legalizing regular marijuana for all purposes |
20.0 pts Meets expectations. Both pros and cons are present and are detailed. Paper is well written. 15.0 pts Developing. Both pros and cons are present and are detail, but paper is not well written 5.0 pts Beginning. Either the pros or cons is missing, and the paper is not well written. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Pros and cons are missing.
|
20.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze, synthesize, and discuss the pros and cons for legalizing regular marijuana for medical purposes |
20.0 pts Meets expectations. Both pros and cons are present and are detailed. Paper is well written. 15.0 pts Developing. Both pros and cons are present and are detail, but paper is not well written 5.0 pts Beginning. Either the pros or cons is missing, and the paper is not well written. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Pros and cons are missing.
|
20.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze, synthesize, and discuss the pros and cons for legalizing Charlotte’s Web for all purposes |
20.0 pts Meets expectations. Both pros and cons are present and are detailed. Paper is well written. 15.0 pts Developing. Both pros and cons are present and are detail, but paper is not well written 5.0 pts Beginning. Either the pros or cons is missing, and the paper is not well written. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Pros and cons are missing.
|
20.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze, synthesize, and discuss the pros and cons pros for legalizing Charlotte’s Web for medical purposes |
20.0 pts Meets expectations. Both pros and cons are present and are detailed. Paper is well written. 15.0 pts Developing. Both pros and cons are present and are detail, but paper is not well written 5.0 pts Beginning. Either the pros or cons is missing, and the paper is not well written. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Pros and cons are missing.
|
20.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeList all the states that have legalized regular marijuana or Charlotte’s Web and the purpose (medical or all use) it was legalized for and the year it was legalized. |
10.0 pts Meets Expectations. All three criteria are listed, and the paper is well written. 5.0 pts Developing. All three criteria are listed, but the paper is not well written. 3.0 pts Beginning. One or more of the three criteria are missing, and the paper is not well written. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. All three of the criteria are missing.
|
10.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper format. Must be doubled spaced, New Times Roman, and 12 point font. |
10.0 pts Meets expectations. All three are present 5.0 pts Developing. Two of the three are present. 3.0 pts Beginning. One of the three are present. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. None of the three are present.
|
10.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling |
15.0 pts Meets expectations. No spelling errors are present. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Spelling errors present.
|
15.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar |
15.0 pts Meets expectations. No grammar errors are present. 8.0 pts Beginning. Less than 5 grammar errors are present. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. More than 5 grammar errors are present.
|
15.0 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format |
25.0 pts Meets expectations. Proper APA format was used. 0.0 pts Not acceptable. Proper APA format was not used.
|
25.0 pts |
|
Total Points: 155.0 |
