media response

FoodBrandsMascots_2015.pdf

Home >Social Science homework help >media response

Obesity Etiology/Pediatric Obesity

Influence of food companies’ brand mascots and entertainment companies’ cartoon media characters on children’s diet and health: a systematic review and research needs

V. I. Kraak1 and M. Story2

1Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and

Exercise, Virginia Tech (Virginia Polytechnic

Institute and State University), Blacksburg,

Virginia, USA; 2Global Health and Community

and Family Medicine, Duke University,

Durham, North Carolina, USA

Received 3 September 2014; revised 18

October 2014; accepted 29 October 2014

Address for correspondence: Dr. VI Kraak,

Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and

Exercise, Virginia Tech (Virginia Polytechnic

Institute and State University), 223 Wallace

Hall, 295 West Campus DriveBlacksburg,

Virginia 24061, USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Summary Reducing the extent and persuasive power of marketing unhealthy foods to children worldwide are important obesity prevention goals. Research is limited to understand how brand mascots and cartoon media characters influence children’s diet. We conducted a systematic review of five electronic databases (2000–2014) to identify experimental studies that measured how food companies’ mascots and entertainment companies’ media characters influence up to 12 diet-related cogni- tive, behavioural and health outcomes for children under 12 years. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies used 21 unique popular media characters, but no brand mascots. Results suggest that cartoon media character branding can positively increase children’s fruit or vegetable intake compared with no character branding. However, familiar media character branding is a more powerful influ- ence on children’s food preferences, choices and intake, especially for energy- dense and nutrient-poor foods (e.g. cookies, candy or chocolate) compared with fruits or vegetables. Future research should use a theoretically grounded concep- tual model and larger and more diverse samples across settings to produce stronger findings for mediating and moderating factors. Future research can be used to inform the deliberations of policymakers, practitioners and advocates regarding how media character marketing should be used to support healthy food environments for children.

Keywords: Brand mascots, children, diet, food marketing, media characters.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index; CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; IOM, Institute of Medicine; RTE, ready-to-eat; US/USA, United States of America; WHO, World Health Organization; WHTF, White House Task Force.

obesity reviews (2015) 16, 107–126

Introduction

In 2013, 2.1 billion people worldwide were overweight or obese (1). One in five children and adolescents aged 5–17 years in several high- and middle-income countries were overweight or obese (2). The World Health Organization

(WHO) estimated that more than 40 million children under the age of 5 years were overweight or obese in 2012, which may reach 70 million by 2025 with current trends (3). Nearly one-third (31.8%) of American children and ado- lescents aged 2–19 years are overweight (14.9%) or obese (16.9%) in the United States (4).

obesity reviews doi: 10.1111/obr.12237

107© 2014 The Authors. Obesity Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. 16, 107–126, February 2015

Two important obesity prevention goals are to (i) reduce the extent of children’s exposure to all forms of marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages and (ii) reduce the per- suasive power of these promotions worldwide (5). Numer- ous systematic evidence reviews have documented that food marketing practices strongly influence children’s food preferences and purchase requests (6–11). A rigorous review conducted by an expert committee of the US Insti- tute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies concluded that food marketing also influences children’s eating behaviours, contributes to an energy-dense and nutrient-poor diet, increases their risk of unhealthy weight gain, and may contribute to negative diet-related health outcomes (8).

The IOM committee concluded that ‘even a small influ- ence, aggregated over the entire population of American children and youth, would be consequential in impact’ (pp. 9 and 13; (8)).

Children are especially vulnerable to current food envi- ronments because they have a biological preference for salty and sweet foods (12). Children’s recognition of food brand logos increases with age (13), and overweight chil- dren are more likely to recognize fast food restaurant logos compared with other food logos (14). Children who recall details about their exposure to fast food and soda brands have greater preferences for salt, sugar and fat (15); and their knowledge of fast food and sugar-sweetened beverage brands is a predictor of body mass index (BMI) (16).

The IOM (2006) (8) and US White House Task Force (WHTF) to Prevent Childhood Obesity (2010) (17) recom- mended that licensed cartoon characters should be used only to promote healthy foods to children. Collective insights are lacking from experimental studies with chil- dren that have examined the persuasive power of food companies’ brand-equity mascots (e.g. Kellogg’s Tony the Tiger and General Mills Inc.’s Buzz Bee) and entertainment companies’ cartoon media characters (e.g. Nickelodeon’s SpongeBob SquarePants, DreamWorks Animation’s Shrek, Walt Disney’s Nemo and Warner Brothers Enter- tainments’ Scooby Doo) to influence children’s diet and health.

Some have advocated that media characters should not be used to market to children who are cognitively immature and vulnerable to target marketing because of their limited ability to differentiate between facts and persuasive mar- keting communications (18). Nevertheless, many popular cartoon brand mascots and media characters are used to promote products high in added sugars, salt and fat, which contribute to unhealthy weight gain and poor diet quality for children. It is unclear whether the IOM and WHTF recommendations are politically feasible, economically viable and socially acceptable. Addressing this research gap could inform effective obesity prevention policies, pro- grammes and advocacy efforts worldwide.

Purpose

This paper had four purposes that include: (i) provide an overview of the global policy context of food marketing to children; (ii) describe how brand mascots and licensed media characters are used to market food products to chil- dren; (iii) examine the persuasive power of character mar- keting through a systematic review of experimental studies that evaluated the influence of cartoon brand mascots or media characters on children’s diet-related cognitive, behavioural and health outcomes; and (iv) identify future research needs to inform the deliberations of policymakers, practitioners, researchers and advocates regarding how mascots and media characters should be used to support healthy food environments for children.

A companion paper (19) examines trends in American children’s exposure to mascots and licensed media charac- ters in the United States from 2000 to 2014, identifies accountability gaps, and suggests how stakeholders can use mascots and licensed characters to encourage healthy dietary choices. Therefore, an in-depth analysis of policies and actions to address industry’s use of mascots and media characters are beyond the scope of this paper.

Global policy context of food marketing to children

Major transnational food, beverage and quick-serve chain restaurant companies that use brand mascots and licensed media characters to market food products to children operate in many countries worldwide. The Hershey Company and Mars, Inc. operate in 50 to 56 countries; Nestlé S.A. operates in over 80 countries; General Mills and McDonald’s Corporation operate in over 100 coun- tries; Kraft Foods in over 160 countries; and PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company conduct businesses in over 200 countries worldwide (20). Media and entertainment com- panies operate many business segments including cable and satellite television, magazines, music, videogames, and Internet advertising (21). The Walt Disney Company oper- ates in over 40 countries (22), Sesame Workshop in 150 countries (23) and Nickelodeon conducts businesses in over 160 countries worldwide (24).

The type of cartoon mascots and licensed media charac- ters used in food promotions varies across countries and global regions. Descriptive research on popular food- product characters used in Australia (25,26); Brazil, India and Russia (27); Guatemala (28); European Union (11); New Zealand (29); Taiwan (30); and the United Kingdom (31,32) and the United States (33–37). have documented the extensive use of culturally tailored mascots and cartoon media characters licensed by major food, beverage and restaurant companies to market primarily energy-dense and nutrient-poor food products to children in various settings.

108 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

In May 2010, the World Health Assembly adopted a landmark resolution to restrict the advertising and market- ing of unhealthy foods and non-alcoholic beverages to chil- dren globally (38). In December 2010, the WHO released recommendations for Member States to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children for products high in saturated fats, trans fats, added sugars and salt (5). An in-depth evaluation framework was developed for governments to implement these recommendations (39). The reduction of unhealthy food and non-alcoholic beverage marketing is also one of 25 core indicators in the WHO’s 2013 Action Plan and Global Monitoring Framework to Prevent and Control Non-Communicable Diseases (40). The WHO rec- ommended that national governments restrict the promo- tion of unhealthy foods to children including brand-equity mascots, licensed characters and celebrities; sales promo- tions; and premiums used across diverse media platforms and settings (39).

Policy relevance of mascot and character marketing to promote foods to children

The use of brand mascots and licensed characters is policy relevant for many reasons. First, companies and marketers use them to build an emotional relationship with children and cultivate brand loyalty for products that persists into adulthood (41–44). Second, children worldwide are tar- geted by companies that use mascots and media characters to promote branded food products to maximize sales and market share (45) even though many of these products are high in added sugars, salt and fat that contribute a poor diet quality and unhealthy weight gain (19).

In 2009, $1.8 US billion dollars was spent by 48 com- panies on child- and adolescent-targeted US food market- ing. Half of all child-marketing dollars ($530.7 million) involved cross-promotions including: media character mer- chandising and tie-ins with movies, television programmes, videogames and social media (46). Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer has generated nearly $11 billion US dollars in worldwide sales since 2002 through character merchandis- ing (47). Finally, this is an evolving policy issue with some positive steps taken by certain US companies (19), but may not apply to other countries.

How brand mascots and media characters are used to market to children

Brand mascots (also called advertising ambassadors, brand icons, brand-equity or trade characters and non-celebrity spokes-characters) and cartoon media characters (also called celebrity spokes-characters) represent a broad range of human or fictional anthropomorphic beings or animated objects (43,44,48–51). Brand mascots are used to promote a product, service or idea, and cartoon media characters are

used to entertain (51). Mascots and media characters are the intellectual property of companies and used in commer- cial licensing, franchising and merchandising activities to build the antecedents for customer brand loyalty (e.g. brand awareness, trust, association and preference) to pur- chase products (42–44,48–51).

Brand mascots are used by food and restaurant compa- nies to create a product identity, promote brand personality and continuity across integrated marketing communica- tions (51). Companies that use mascots retain 100% of the revenues generated in retail transactions, and mascots can be used for decades in promotions. In contrast, cartoon media characters (47,52) owned by entertainment compa- nies are licensed through contractual agreements that allow characters to be used in cross-promotions (e.g. television programmes and movie tie-ins such as SpongeBob SquarePants cereal) and merchandizing opportunities (e.g. displays and premiums such as toy replicas of media char- acters, prizes or giveaways) (46,47). Entertainment compa- nies receive royalties from other companies in exchange for using one or more characters in advertising campaigns that may last for several days or years.

The 1950s Baby Boom era brought television to house- holds and food companies marketed their products directly to children through mascots and characters to differentiate their company’s products from the competition (52–54). Mascots and characters are deeply embedded in American culture where many of them were created (49–55). Mar- keters can control the messaging for fictional mascots and characters more effectively than human celebrities to main- tain or defend a positive brand reputation to promote product sales and brand equity (43,49,56). Companies have visually transformed mascots over decades to appear healthier and physically fit as social norms change, to stay competitive against other brands in similar product catego- ries, and to adapt them to international markets (49,57).

Figure 1 provides examples of more than 40 brand mascots used by 15 food and restaurant companies (58–72) that participate in the US Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative (CFBAI) (73). The figure is based on an extensive search of published articles, industry trade literature, books (53–55) and companies’ websites. The figure does not include mascots owned by companies that do not voluntarily participate in the CFBAI, such as Chuck E. Cheese’s Mr. Cheese Mouse (33). Figure 2 provides examples of more than 55 cartoon media characters that are owned and licensed by five major entertainment and media companies (74–78) to promote food products to children. The figure is based on characters identified through several resources (33,46) supplemented by an extensive search of companies’ websites.

A trademark is a ‘word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of these elements, that identifies and distin- guishes the source of one party’s goods from those of

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 109

another’ used in the commercial marketplace (79). The trademarked images used in Figs 1 and 2 are reproduced for educational purposes only. The US ‘nominative fair use’ doctrine allows their use for non-commercial purposes, which protects an individual’s free speech over trademark infringement (80).

Children’s relationships with mascots and characters

Children learn about mascots and characters through social, media and marketing environments including their parents, television, movies, the Internet and food packaging (81). Children develop ‘parasocial relationships’ with favourite characters, representing emotionally infused friendships based on characters ‘attractiveness and the mes- sages they convey (82) that can influence their diet-related outcomes. Mascots and characters are associated with

memorable slogans, jingles, taglines, musical themes and stories (49,50,83,84); and market nostalgia through trans- generational, parent–child interactions that generate fun, humour, emotional appeals and positive feelings towards company brands and products (49,51,52,83).

Figure 3 provides a conceptual model grounded in socioecological and socio-cognitive theories adapted from a causal model developed by the IOM Food Marketing Com- mittee (8) and a parasocial interactions model developed by child development and psychology researchers (82).

The figure shows that companies use cartoon mascots and media characters through merchandizing, franchising and licensing strategies to market food products and mes- sages to children to influence their diet-related outcomes. Figure 3 only describes mediating factors that may promote or reinforce parasocial interactions and relationships and moderating factors (e.g. age, gender, race and ethnicity) that may influence children’s diet-related outcomes.

Figure 1 Examples of brand mascots used by companies participating in the US Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative to promote food products to American children by specific food categories of nutritional concern. As of October 2014, the 17 CFBAI members are: Campbell Soup Company, ConAgra Foods, Inc., The Dannon Co., Inc., Ferrero USA, Inc., General Mills, Inc., The Hershey Company, Kellogg Company, Kraft Foods Group, Inc., Mars, Inc., Mondeléz Global LLC, Nestlé USA, PepsiCo, Inc., Post Foods, LLC, The Coca-Cola Co., Unilever United States, Burger King Corp. and McDonald’s USA. Italicize texts are brand mascot names. Texts in purple are brands that the mascots represent. Texts in red are the companies that own the copyright and/or trademark for the mascot. Number in parentheses is the decade or the year that the mascot was created. The trademarked images used in this figure are intended for educational purposes only. Their use is allowed for non-commercial purposes through the US ‘nominative fair use’ doctrine that protects free speech over trademark infringement. Sources: references (49,53–55,58–72).

110 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

However, it does not describe the specific mechanisms by which the mascots and characters influence children.

Figure 3 offers a continuum of outcomes, including cogni- tive outcomes (e.g. character and brand recognition; charac- ter trust; character, food brand or marketing message recall; and character, taste or snack preference); behavioural out- comes (e.g. purchase request, food choice and food intake); and health outcomes (e.g. BMI). The model excludes business-related outcomes, such as media impressions and food product sales, which are beyond the scope of this paper.

Methods

The research question that guided this systematic review was ‘What do experimental studies show about the influ- ence of cartoon brand mascots and media characters on

children’s diet-related cognitive, behavioural and health outcomes?’ We developed a protocol to guide the search strategy described below.

Search strategy

The causal model described in Figure 3 was used to guide the search strategy and analysis. To identify search terms, we reviewed resources from the business and marketing, child development and communication literature published during the 1990s (51,52,84,85) and the non-experimental and industry trade literature published after 2000. A third independent researcher conducted the search using subject headings and text terms (i.e. brand mascot or cartoon spokes-character or character or licensed or anthropomor- phic and advertising or marketing and child and food

Figure 2 Examples of entertainment companies’ popular media characters that have been licensed to food and restaurant companies to promote food products to American children. Related business may include television; animated motion pictures, movies, and films; videos and DVDs; books and comics; radio; music; interactive digital media including advergames and online virtual worlds; theme parks and resorts; and merchandizing, franchising, and licensing. Texts in purple italics are media character names. Texts in roman purple are the parent companies that own the copyright and/or trademark for the character. Texts in green are the companies or networks. Texts in red are the food or restaurant companies that have licensed the media character to promote food products to children. Number in parentheses is the decade or the year that the mascot was created. The trademarked images used in this figure are intended for educational purposes only. Their use is allowed for non-commercial purposes through the US ‘nominative fair use’ doctrine that protects free speech over trademark infringement. Sources: references (74–78).

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 111

or beverage or cereal or restaurant or food retail or nutrition).

Five English databases (i.e. Academic Search Premier, Business Source Premier, CINAHL, Health Source and Medline via PubMed) were searched between 1 January 2000 and 31 May 2014 to examine trends in American children’s exposure to mascots and licensed char- acters within the context of the evolving US regulatory, food marketing and children’s digital media landscapes during this time frame. The search was supplemented by a review of the bibliographies of both the experimental and non-experimental studies collected.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The a priori inclusion search criteria included: (i) any experi- mental study involving children ages 2 through 12 years; (ii) use of one or more visual cartoon mascots and/or licensed characters; (iii) measurement of one or more diet-related cognitive, behavioural or health outcomes and (iv) English- language paper published between January 2000 and May 2014. Exclusion criteria were: (i) experimental studies involving adults and adolescents; (ii) experimental studies that examined children’s response to food packaging, but measured other types of exposures (e.g. nutrient-content

claims, sports celebrity endorsement or premiums) and did not measure outcomes of interest related to mascot and/or media character exposure; (iii) non-experimental descriptive studies that assessed the nature, prevalence or frequency of mascot or character use on television, the Internet or in food-retail settings and (iv) studies that used mascots or characters to promote non-food products (i.e. tobacco, alcohol and medications) or athletic events.

Study selection

The co-investigators independently reviewed the abstracts and full papers for the final selection. As shown in Fig. 4, 50 studies were initially identified, but were reduced to 46 studies after removing duplicates. After reviewing the abstracts, 28 records were excluded leaving 18 records. An additional nine records were excluded after reading the full papers because they were descriptive or did not report relevant outcomes. The reference lists of the remaining nine papers were reviewed for any records that met the inclusion criteria. Two additional papers that met the inclusion cri- teria were identified and included in the final systematic review (n = 11). The co-investigator independently reviewed the papers and reached consensus with the lead investigator on the records retained. We independently

Figure 3 Conceptual model of the influence of cartoon brand mascots and media characters on children’s diet and health. Sources: references (8,82).

112 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

reviewed the evidence to reach consensus on their contents. The analysis was conducted between 1 June and 15 July 2014.

Results

Eleven experimental studies were identified that were pub- lished between 2004 and 2014. Table 1 provides an over- view of the 11 studies and lists the primary author, year the study was conducted and published, age range, sample size and sex, race or ethnicity, and diet-related outcomes meas- ured. Table 2 describes the study design, characters used and results. Table 3 lists four quality assessment criteria used to evaluate the studies including: (i) use of a theoreti- cally grounded, conceptual framework to guide the research; (ii) number and type of outcomes measured; (iii) causal inference validity (e.g. strength of the evidence to support an associative or causal inference between media character exposure and outcomes measured) and (iv) eco- logical validity (e.g. degree to which the study results can be generalized to daily life).

The research was conducted in five countries: the United States, Netherlands, Belgium, Guatemala and Turkey. The age range of children was 2–11 years. Nine studies involved children aged 2–6 years with a sample size ranging from n = 16–343 (86–94); one study involved children aged 4–11 years (n = 121) (95), and one study included children aged 8–11 years (n = 208) (96) (Table 1). Only two studies (89,92) reported details of ethnic and racial diversity, and the study conducted in Guatemala included only Latino children (95). Three studies measured sex differences

(86,92,93), but noted no differences in the response of boys and girls to the characters used on the food products.

No study tested children’s response to a brand mascot owned by a food, beverage or restaurant company. A total of 21 unique popular cartoon media characters owned by five leading entertainment companies were used across 11 studies (Table 2). Culturally specific media characters, including Chavo in Guatemala (95) and Kabouter Plop (a popular gnome) in Belgium (94) were also used. Several studies included unknown animal characters (e.g. monkey, mouse, penguin, rabbit and dinosaur); and the Flemish study included an unknown gnome.

Quality assessment

Neely and Schumann (91) was the only study that reported using a theoretically grounded causal model to guide the design and analysis (Table 3). These investiga- tors examined seven outcomes compared with the remain- ing 10 studies, which measured only between two and four cognitive or behavioural outcomes. The causal infer- ence validity was rated medium for the randomized con- trolled studies and low for non-randomized study designs. No study received a high rating of causal inference valid- ity because of the small sample sizes. Ecological validity was rated medium for all studies because they were con- ducted in real-life settings.

Outcomes measured

There was wide heterogeneity in how the outcomes were measured and reported across each study. Therefore, they

Figure 4 Process used for the systematic review to identify experimental studies that examined the influence of brand mascots and cartoon media characters on the diet-related outcomes of children <12 years.

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 113

T a

b le

1 D

e sc

ri p

tio n

o f

th e

e xp

e ri m

e n

ta l st

u d

ie s

a n

d o

u tc

o m

e s

m e

a su

re d

in th

e sy

st e

m a

tic re

vi e

w ,

2 0

0 4

–2 0

1 4

A u th

o r

ye a r

p u b

lis h e d

C o u n tr

S tu

d y

d a te

A g

e ra

n g

ye a rs

S a m

p le

si ze

(n =)

S e x:

M /F

R a c e

o r

e th

n ic

ity %

D ie

t- re

la te

d o u tc

o m

e s

C o g

n iti

ve (n

= 7 )

B e h a vi

o u ra

l (n

= 4 )

H e a lth

(n =

1 )

C h a ra

c te

o r

b ra

n d

re c o g

n iti

o n

C h a ra

c te

tr u st

C h a ra

c te

a n d

b ra

n d

a ss

o c ia

tio n

C h a ra

c te

b ra

n d

o r

m e ss

a g

e re

c a ll

C h a ra

c te

p re

fe re

n c e

Ta st

e o r

sn a c k

p re

fe re

n c e

a n d

a p

p e tit

P u rc

h a se

re q

u e st

F o o d

c h o ic

F o o d

in ta

D ie

q u a lit

B o d

m a ss

in d

e x

d e

D ro

o g

e t a l.,

2 0 1 1

(8 6 )

N e th

e rl a n d

2 0 0 8

4 –6

2 1 6

M :1

0 8

F :1

0 8

D u tc

R a c e

N R

N N

Y Y

Y N

N N

d e

D ro

o g

e t a l.,

2 0 1 2

(8 7 )

N e th

e rl a n d

2 0 0 9

4 –6

1 6 6

M :8

F :8

D u tc

R a c e

N R

Y c h a ra

c te

N Y c h a ra

c te

r a n d

p ro

d u c t

N N

K e lle

r e t a l.,

2 0 1 2

(8 8 )

U S

N R

4 –5

1 6

M :N

F :N

E th

n ic

a lly

d iv

e rs

e N

R N

N N

N Y

K o tle

r e t a l.,

2 0 1 2

(8 9 )

U S

N R

S tu

d y

2 –6

S tu

d y

3 –6

3 4 3

M :1

6 8

F :1

7 5

2 0 7

N R

E th

n ic

a lly

d iv

e rs

e C

a u c a si

a n :

4 2 %

A fr

ic a n -A

m e ri c a n :

3 5 %

L a tin

o :

1 1 %

A si

a n :

5 %

O th

e r:

7 %

Y c h a ra

c te

N N

N Y

Y N

N N

L a p

ie rr

e e t a l.,

2 0 1 1

(9 0 )

U S

2 0 0 7

4 –6

8 0

M :3

F :4

A m

e ri c a n

R a c e

N R

N N

Y c h a ra

c te

r a n d

b ra

n d

N Y

Y N

N N

L e to

n a

e t a l.,

2 0 1 4

(9 5 )

G u a te

m a la

N R

4 –1

1 1 2 1

M :5

F :6

L a tin

o Y c

h a ra

c te

N N

Y N

N N

N e e le

y &

S c h u m

a n n ,

2 0 0 4

(9 1 )

U S

N R

S tu

d y

2 –5

S tu

d y

2 –5

6 6

M :3

F :3

3 7

M :1

F :1

A m

e ri c a n

C a u c a si

a n :

8 5 –8

9 %

A fr

ic a n -A

m e ri c a n :

1 %

L a tin

o :

0 –1

.3 %

A si

a n :

4 .5

–6 %

M ix

e d

1 .5

–2 .7

Y c h a ra

c te

r vs

p ro

d u c t

N Y c h a ra

c te

r a n d

b ra

n d

Y Y

Y N

N N

R o b

e rt

o e t a l.,

2 0 1 0

(9 2 )

U S

N R

4 –6

4 0

M :2

F :1

A m

e ri c a n

C a u c a si

a n :

5 0 %

A fr

ic a n -A

m e ri c a n :

2 0 %

L a tin

o :

1 2 .5

A si

a n :

1 7 .5

Y c h a ra

c te

N N

Y N

N N

S m

its &

V a n d

e rb

o sc

h ,

2 0 1 2

(9 4 )

B e lg

iu m

N R

6 –7

5 7

M :2

F :3

F le

m is

R a c e

N R

N N

N Y

Y Y

N N

Ü lg

e r,

2 0 0 9

(9 3 )

Tu rk

e y

N R

6 1 4 4

M :7

F :7

Tu rk

is h

R a c e

N R

N N

N Y

N N

N Y

N N

W a n si

n k

e t a l.,

2 0 1 2 5

(9 6 )

U S

N R

8 –1

1 2 0 8

M :1

0 9

F :9

E th

n ic

a lly

d iv

e rs

R a c e

N R

N N

N Y

Y N

N ,

n o ;

N R

, n o t

re p

o rt

e d

; Y,

ye s.

114 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

Table 2 Description of the study design, media characters used, and results of experimental studies included in the systematic review, 2004–2014

Author year

published

Study design Media characters used Results

de Droog et al.,

2011 (86)

Netherlands

Randomized controlled trial

A 4-point scale was used to test nine

experimental conditions among children

(n = 216; 4–6 years) asked to select chopped bananas versus banana candy that had either

one of two familiar media characters versus an

unfamiliar character (monkey) versus no

character.

ANOVA was used to measure significance for

three cognitive outcomes:

1. character preference

2. snack preference

3. purchase request

Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer for

girls and SpongeBob SquarePants for

boys were the familiar characters used

Both familiar and unfamiliar cartoon media

characters increased young children’s

preference and purchase request for fruit

compared with candy.

Preschool children’s preference for and

purchase request for fruit did not differ

between a familiar versus unfamiliar

character.

No character reduced preference for and

purchase request for fruit.

No difference was observed between boys

and girls.

de Droog et al.,

2012 (87)

Netherlands

Within subjects repeated measure design

Children (n = 166; 4–6 years) were exposed to five different, randomly selected

character–product picture combinations:

• familiar character versus unfamiliar character

and a carrot

• conceptually and perceptually congruent

character (orange rabbit and a carrot)

• conceptually congruent (gray rabbit and a

carrot)

• perceptually congruent (orange rhino and a

carrot)

• incongruent (gray rhino and a carrot)

ANOVA was used to measure the significance

for three cognitive outcomes:

1. Familiar character recognition

2. Character and product preference

3. Character preference (familiar versus

unfamiliar)

Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer and Diego

were the familiar characters used

91% of the children were able to identify Dora

and Diego.

Children preferred a familiar character and

conceptually congruent character–product

pair (e.g. gray rabbit and a carrot) linked to a

product by a story compared with an

incongruent character–product pair (e.g. gray

rhino and a carrot).

Children preferred a familiar

character–product combination (Dora or

Diego and a carrot) more than an unfamiliar

character–product combination (rabbit or

rhino and a carrot).

Keller et al., 2012

(88)

USA

Randomized controlled trial × 7 weeks This study was one of three branding

experiments that involved parents and their

children (n = 16; 4–5 years). Parents in the intervention group offered their

child a colourful package of fresh fruits and

vegetables + familiar character + premium (redeemable sticker for a prize) + nutritional counselling versus parents in the control group

who offered their child fruit and vegetables in a

plain package.

ANOVA was used to measure two outcomes:

1. food intake

2. body mass index

Sesame Workshop’s Elmo was the familiar

characters used

Familiar character branding using Elmo

significantly increased children’s fruit and

vegetable intake compared with a control

group that showed no change.

Children in the intervention group decreased

their BMI z-score compared with children in

the control group who increased their BMI

z-score.

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 115

Table 2 Continued

Author year

published

Study design Media characters used Results

Kotler et al., 2012

(89)

USA

Randomized controlled trial

Study 1 assessed the effect of branding on

children (n = 343; 2–6 years) using three familiar cartoon media characters (Elmo, Bert and Ernie)

versus three unfamiliar cartoon anthropomorphic

characters (e.g. dinosaur) versus no character

on children’s food preference by selecting one

out of nine sets of selected food photos for

zucchini versus celery, mushrooms versus peas,

grapes versus bananas, donut versus Cheerios,

potato chips versus apple, chocolate versus

broccoli, star fruit versus melon, cherry tomato

versus cauliflower, and Saltines versus

pumpernickel crackers.

A third of the children were asked to select their

favourite foods from the pairs with no characters

(control group); a third selected their preferred

food with a Sesame character on targeted foods

and a third selected their preferred food with an

unknown character (intervention groups).

Study 2 assessed the effect of branding on

children (n = 207; 3–6 years) using Elmo versus an unknown character versus no character on

their willingness to taste and eat food

(outcome = food intake) via selected photos for three sets of food.

Sesame Workshop’s Elmo, Grover and

Oscar were the familiar characters used

Branding with a familiar character increased

children’s preference for and willingness to

taste and eat both healthy and unhealthy

foods.

Branding was strong when a familiar

character was used on an unhealthy branded

snack food compared with an unfamiliar

character on a healthy branded snack food

versus no character.

Children were more willing to try a healthy

food (fruit or vegetable) with a favourite brand

character compared with an unknown

character.

When a healthy food branded by a popular

character competed against a branded

unhealthy food, the popular character did not

increase children’s preference for the healthy

food.

When two foods in the same category (i.e. 2

vegetables, 2 fruits or 2 grains) competed

against each other, character branding

strongly influenced children’s food choice

compared with no character.

Lapierre et al.,

2011 (90)

USA

Between-subjects study design

A 5-point smile scale was used to test the

preference of children (n = 80; 4–6 years) for ready-to-eat cereals under four conditions:

• healthy bits cereal versus sugar bits cereal

• character preference (penguin versus no

character) Warner Brothers Entertainment’s Mumble and

Gloria from the movie, Happy Feet, were the

familiar cartoon media characters used

Children who saw a popular media character

on the box preferred the cereal with the

character versus no character.

Children who were told the cereal was called

Healthy Bits liked the taste more than

children who were told it was called Sugar

Bits.

Children preferred the character on Sugar

Bits compared with Healthy Bits suggesting

that the character is a more powerful

influence than the nutritional merits of the

cereal.

Letona et al.,

2014 (95)

Guatemala

Between-subjects study design

Three cartoon media characters were used to

assess three outcomes for children (n = 121; 4–11 years) including:

• recognition of popular characters

• taste preference and snack preference for

three foods: potato chips, crackers and baby

carrots.

Nickelodeon’s SpongeBob SquarePants, Warner

Brothers Entertainment’s Pink Panther and El

Chavo were the familiar characters used

Children showed a high recognition of familiar

media characters (92–98%).

The use of a familiar licensed character on

food packaging increased children’s taste

and snack preferences.

Younger children (4–6 years) were more likely

to prefer a food with a licensed media

character compared with older children

(7–11 years).

116 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

Table 2 Continued

Author year

published

Study design Media characters used Results

Neeley &

Schumann, 2004

(91)

USA

Post-test, between-subjects factorial designs

Study 1 exposed children (n = 66; 2–5 years) to an animated mock commercial showing an

unfamiliar cartoon character paired with a

product (mouse eating cheese).

The commercial was embedded into a television

programme and shown three times to children.

Other commercials for food ads (e.g. Cheerios,

Cap’n Crunch and a toy tea set) were also

shown to children. Each child was randomly

assigned to the experimental or control group.

Children in the experimental group were shown

three sets of flashcards and pointed to the

animal they saw in the commercial and the food

that the animal was eating. Statistical tests were

used to measure seven outcomes:

1. Character versus brand recognition (to

assess attention to commercial)

2. Character and brand association

3. Character and product recall

4. Character preference

5. Food preference (fruit versus chips or

cookie)

6. Purchase request (intention to eat)

7. Food choice

Study 2 used statistical tests to examine the

significant influence of auditory messages on

children (n = 37; 2–5 years) who were either exposed to two character voices or no

voices in commercials to assess their

attention and retention of information from an

animated commercial for fruit snacks.

A cartoon mouse was the non-celebrity

character used

Children had a higher recall for the animated

mouse (78%) compared with fewer children

(52%) who recalled the food product

(cheese) advertised.

Children’s exposure to the cartoon mouse

was statistically significant only for the food

product preference (cheese) but not the other

variables.

Children’s exposure to auditory messages

with animated characters (bear and dog) did

not positively influence the seven variables

measured.

Children’s attention, recognition and

preference for cartoon characters was not

significantly related to high levels of food

product preference, intention to eat, and food

product choice.

Roberto et al.,

2010 (92)

USA

Between-subjects study design

Children (n = 40; 4–6 years) were exposed to three study foods (e.g. graham crackers,

gummy fruit snacks and baby carrots) that were

branded with three different popular licensed

cartoon media characters to examine three

outcomes:

1. character recognition

2. character influence on taste preference

3. character influence on food choice.

A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess

children’s character recognition.

Statistical tests were used to determine

children’s taste preference versus snack choice.

Warner Brothers Entertainment’s Scooby Doo,

Nickelodeon’s Dora the Explorer and

DreamWorks Animation, SKG’s Shrek were the

familiar characters used

Children’s recognition of popular characters

ranged from 60 to 90%.

A majority of children preferred the taste of

foods and selected snacks with a licensed

character versus no character, especially for

gummy fruit candy and graham crackers

compared with baby carrots.

No differences were observed based on

children’s age, ethnicity or race and sex.

Smits &

Vanderbosch,

2012 (94)

Belgium

Between-subjects study design

Baseline measures were obtained for children

(n = 57; 6–7 years) on a 5-point appetite scale and 10-point scale for children’s self-reported

frequency of intake and frequency of parental

purchase of grapes, apples, chocolate and

cookies.

A questionnaire was used to assess children’s

reported intended frequency of intake, appetite

for and purchase request for each food that was

endorsed either by a familiar celebrity media

character (Kabouter Plop gnome) or an

unknown gnome.

Three outcomes were measured:

1. increased appetite

2. intent to consume

3. purchase request

Studio 100’s Kabouter Plop was the familiar

media character used

Children’s self-reported appetite, intention to

consume and frequency of parental purchase

requests increased when either a familiar

media character gnome or an unfamiliar

gnome was used on foods.

The familiar media character gnome had a

stronger effect on the three outcomes

measured compared with the unknown

gnome, especially for chocolate.

The unfamiliar gnome had a smaller positive

effect on the three outcomes measured

compared with baseline.

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 117

Table 2 Continued

Author year

published

Study design Media characters used Results

Ülger, 2009 (93)

Turkey

Randomized controlled trial

Children (n = 144; 6 years) in the experimental group were shown a 50-minute cartoon show on

a compact disc with Warner Brothers’ Looney

Tunes cartoon characters (e.g. Bugs Bunny)

that showed two embedded commercials for a

chocolate wafer (product 1) (experimental

group) compared with children who watched the

cartoon without the commercials (control group).

Two outcomes were measured:

1. message recall

2. product choice

Children in the experimental group described

the advertising content of the commercials.

Chi-squared test was used to assess one of two

food products that was most appealing to

children: either the chocolate wafer shown on

the commercials (product 1) or a chocolate

wafer with an appealing package branded with

one of five Walt Disney characters (product 2)

that was not shown in the commercial.

Five media characters of The Walt Disney

Company were used on the child-appealing food

package: Donald Duck, Tina Russo Duck,

Mickey and Minnie Mouse and Goofy

Five media characters of Warner Brothers

Entertainment were shown in the 50-min cartoon

programme with embedded commercials: Bugs

Bunny, Tom and Jerry, Tweety and the Tasmanian

Devil

Children who watched the cartoon show with

the embedded commercials demonstrated

good recall of the content of the chocolate

wafer advertisements.

Children who viewed the cartoon show with

or without the embedded commercials chose

the chocolate wafer with the packaging

branded with the Walt Disney characters

(74%) rather than the wafer advertised in the

cartoon programme with the Warner Brothers

media characters (26%)

No significant differences were observed for

product choices made by boys versus girls.

Wansink et al.,

2012 (96)

USA

Cross-over study design

Over the course of five days, children (n = 208; 8–11 years) from seven schools were given an

apple or cookie without a branded character

(days 1 and 5).

Children were given a choice of an apple and

cookie branded with Elmo (day 2).

Children were given a choice of an apple

branded with Elmo and an unbranded cookie

(day 3).

Children were given a choice of an unbranded

cookie and an unknown cartoon character (day

4).

Chi-squared test was used to assess the

statistical significance for two behavioural

outcomes:

1. food choice

2. food intake

Sesame Workshop’s Elmo was the familiar

characters used

Given a choice between the unbranded

apple and cookie, about 90% of children

choice the cookie.

Children were more likely to choose an apple

branded with an Elmo sticker compared with

the pre-test control.

A branded mascot sticker with Elmo had no

effect on children’s cookie consumption.

ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index.

118 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

were categorized into one of 12 outcomes including: seven cognitive outcomes (e.g. character or brand recognition; character trust; character and brand association; character, brand or message recall; character preference; and taste or snack preference and appetite); four behavioural outcomes (e.g. purchase request, food choice, food or product intake, and diet quality); and one health outcome (e.g. BMI) (Table 1).

Character recognition, trust, recall and brand association

Five studies measured children’s recognition of popular characters at baseline and found a high recognition ranging

from 60 to 90% (87,89,91,92,95). No study examined children’s trust of characters. One study measured chi- ldren’s recall of an animated mouse (78%), but fewer chil- dren (52%) recalled correctly the food product (cheese) (91). A second study measured children’s recall of adver- tising content with media characters and found a high degree of message recall for age-appropriate content (93).

Three studies measured children’s character and brand association (87,90,91). Of these, de Droog et al. (87) found that younger children preferred a familiar and conceptually congruent character–product pair (e.g. gray rabbit and a carrot) linked to a story compared with an incongruent character–product pair (e.g. gray rhino and a carrot). LaPierre et al. (90) found that children preferred the familiar penguin characters on the Sugar Bits versus Healthy Bits cereal; and Neeley and Schumann (91) found a high degree of congruent character and food product association (e.g. mouse and cheese).

Character preference or taste or snack preference

Several studies examined the influence of media characters on children’s character preference (familiar versus unfamil- iar versus none) (86,90,91) or taste and snack preference, and one study examined character influence on children’s appetite (94). Two studies (89,90) documented that chil- dren prefer a character over no character on a product package. Two studies also found that children are more likely to try and prefer fruits when endorsed by a media character (89,90). When given a choice between a familiar versus unfamiliar character, only one study (86) found no statistically significant differences between younger chi- ldren’s preference for fruit versus candy when endorsed by a familiar character (e.g. Dora or SpongeBob SquarePants) versus an unfamiliar monkey character.

Three studies (89–91) found that children liked or pre- ferred a familiar media character used to promote energy- dense foods such as sugary cereal, potato chips, crackers and candy compared with fruits or vegetables. Thus, when a fruit or vegetable with a branded character competed against energy-dense foods using the same character, chil- dren preferred the energy-dense food. Only one study (94) showed the presence of a media character on a package increased children’s self-reported appetite for grapes, apples, cookies or chocolate compared with no character.

Behavioural and health outcomes: purchase request, food choice or intake and BMI

Of the three studies (86,91,94) that examined character influence on children’s purchase request or intention to eat, children were more likely to request foods (e.g. fruit versus candy, or fruit versus chocolate or cookies) with the pres- ence of either a familiar or unfamiliar media character. The

Table 3 Assessment criteria used to evaluate the experimental studies in the systematic review

Author, year country

1 2 3 4

de Droog et al., 2011 (86) Netherlands

N 3/12 M M

de Droog et al., 2012 (87) Netherlands

N 2/12 L M

Keller et al., 2012 (88) United States

N 2/12 M M

Kotler et al., 2012 (89) United States

N 4/12 M M

Lapierre et al., 2011 (90) United States

N 3/12 L M

Letona et al., 2014 (95) Guatemala

N 2/12 L M

Neeley & Schumann, 2004 (91) United States

Y 7/12 M M

Roberto et al., 2010 (92) United States

N 3/12 L M

Smits & Vanderbosch, 2012 (94) Belgium

N 3/12 L M

Ülger, 2009 (93) Turkey

N 2/12 M M

Wansink et al., 2012 (96) United States

N 2/12 L M

1. Did the investigators use a theoretically grounded conceptual model or analytic framework to guide the research design and analysis, and to interpret the results? (Y, yes, N, no, NR, not reported.) 2. How many outcomes were measured for each study?†

(x/12 = number of outcomes measured out of 12 potential outcomes identified in Figure 3.) 3. What is the level of causal inference validity for each study?‡§ (H, high, M, medium, L, low. Casual inference validity is the strength of the evidence for the investigator to make an associative or casual inference between a marketing variable [media character exposure] and a diet-related cognitive [n = 7], behavioural [n = 4] and health [n = 1] outcome. The measures [H, M or L] take into consideration three dimensions: validity, reliability and precision.) 4. What is the level of ecological validity for each study?†‡§ (H, high, M, medium, L, low. Ecological validity is the degree to which the investigator can generalize the study results to daily life.) Criteria 3 and 4 were adapted from the IOM Food Marketing to Children and Youth report (8).

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 119

familiar media celebrity gnome had a stronger effect on children’s purchase request for chocolate over fruit versus an unknown gnome (94). Six studies examined media char- acter influence on children’s food choices (89,91–94,96). Four of these studies found that the effect of character branding was stronger for a familiar character on an unhealthy food versus the same character used to promote fruit or vegetables. A familiar media character on a package was also more influential on children’s food choice than a television commercial with different cartoon media charac- ters with embedded advertisements for a chocolate wafer (93).

Two studies examined character influence on children’s willingness to consume or actual food intake (88,96). Wansink et al. (96) uniquely found that Elmo branding of apples significantly increased children’s intake over 3 days compared with Elmo branding of a cookie in a school setting. Keller et al. (88) was the only study to measure children’s BMI and found that Elmo’s character branding significantly increased children’s fruit and vegetable intake and decreased their BMI z-score over 7 weeks compared with the control subjects.

Keller et al. (88) was one of two studies that examined several combined factors. Elmo was combined with colourful packaging and a prize (stickers) and nutritional counselling. Neeley and Schumann (91) examined the influ- ence of both visual action and auditory messages on chi- ldren’s attention and retention of information, but were unable to draw a definitive conclusion about character exposure and children’s food choice.

Discussion

This systematic review compiled evidence from 11 pub- lished experimental studies involving children aged 2–11 years to evaluate collective insights about the influence of brand mascots and cartoon media characters on children’s diet-related cognitive, behavioural and health outcomes. While it is difficult to draw firm conclusions because of methodological heterogeneity, the most salient results from the studies are summarized later:

1. Media character branding may be a promising strat- egy to increase children’s preference for, purchase request, choice and intake of fruits and vegetables compared with no character branding.

2. An unfamiliar cartoon media character may increase children’s appetite, preference for, choice and intake of healthy foods compared with no character branding.

3. When healthy foods compete against energy-dense foods (e.g. fruit or vegetables versus cookies, candy or chocolate), familiar media character branding is a more powerful influence that increases children’s appetite, pref- erence for, choice and intake of less healthy foods.

Study strengths and limitations

One strength of this systematic review was the use of four quality assessment criteria to evaluate the studies. Two of these evidence quality grading criteria (e.g. causal inference validity and ecological validity) were used in the IOM systematic review (8).

A second strength was our use of a theoretically grounded, conceptual framework to assess whether and how the studies measured up to 12 diet-related outcomes. Collec- tively, the studies had several limitations including: small and heterogeneous sample sizes; several that did not report or analyse moderating factors including race, ethnic or gender differences; and most studies measured only two to four of 12 possible dietary outcomes. These limitations made it difficult to compare the results across the studies and limit the use of evidence to support definitive conclusions.

Future research implications

Several research gaps are discussed later, including: (i) the importance of theory-grounded experimental research; (ii) children’s parasocial relationships with mascots and media characters; (iii) children’s associative learning and dietary outcomes; (iv) disentangling the influence of several medi- ating factors and (v) food-retail settings. Proposed ques- tions for future research are summarized in Table 4.

Importance of theory-grounded research

Theoretically grounded conceptual models can help to design relevant studies to inform future research, policies and practice. A theory provides justification for one’s actions whereas a conceptual framework allows investiga- tors to reflect systematically on complex factors that influ- ence children’s diet and health. Only one study used a theoretically grounded conceptual model to guide the study design and interpretation of the results. Neeley and Schumann (91) used a modified hierarchy of effects model (97) that measured children’s awareness and knowledge, liking and preferences, and purchasing behaviours. While this model has been critiqued for a simplistic conceptualization of children’s information processing (98), it suggests the need to examine and understand how mascot and media character exposure influences many interrelated cognitive, behavioural and health outcomes.

One might postulate that using popular and familiar media characters may encourage children’s preference for, choice, and intake of fruits and vegetables to improve their diet and health. Empirical research is lacking to support this proposition, especially given the international research showing that media characters are used to promote foods with excessive amounts of fat, added

120 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

sugars and salt (25,26,28,29,31–35). An unpublished study not included in this systematic review tested the effect of four familiar cartoon media characters versus unknown animal characters versus no characters on the food choices of 6–7-year-old children (n = 164) in Arkan- sas. This study found that using unfamiliar media char- acters unexpectedly reduced children’s choice of both fruit and unhealthy foods (99).

To ensure ecological validity, future research should use a theoretically grounded conceptual model to acknowledge the complexity and diversity of real-world conditions that influence whether and how children will choose healthy- profile foods over energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods. Additionally, quasi-experimental and longitudinal research designs are needed to evaluate large-scale natural experi- ments, such as the short- and long-term effects of Sesame Workshop’s decision to implement a royalty-free, character-licensing fee waiver between 2014 and 2016 for produce companies to use its media characters to promote fruit and vegetables to children between 2014 and 2016 (100–102).

Children’s relationship with mascots and characters

A clearer understanding is needed for how children develop parasocial relationships with mascots and media characters

(82) to influence their diet-related outcomes. Traditional models have used an information-processing approach to understand how food marketing practices influence chi- ldren’s diet and health. Harris et al. (103) suggest that psychological models based on social-cognitive theory and knowledge persuasion show that the effects of marketing exposure occur without children’s conscious awareness of marketing cues and represents implicit learning.

This is relevant to how companies use nostalgic mascots and popular media characters to market to children with their parents. Moreover, marketers use animal mascots (e.g. Tony the Tiger and Buzz Bee) and media characters (e.g. Kung Fu Panda, Big Bird, Miss Piggy and the Lion King) that tap into shared and socially learned cultural meanings to design successful advertising campaigns (50) through various settings and media platforms that appeal to chil- dren and their parents. Future research should examine familial interactions related to intergenerational loyalty marketing that uses nostalgic mascots and characters in various settings. Research could also empirically test a food marketing defence model (103) to help older children and their parents resist food marketing stimuli.

No study reviewed tested the influence of food compa- nies’ mascots on children’s diet-related outcomes, which is a remarkable finding given these mascots’ lucrative value to sell branded foods in categories of concern that impact children’s diet and health. Public health advocates often

Table 4 Proposed future research questions regarding brand mascot and media character influence on children’s diet and health

Thematic topic Future research questions

Theoretical framework What are the theoretical underpinnings and specific mechanisms used by marketers to encourage children to develop parasocial relationships with popular mascots and cartoon media character that promote food products?

Moderating factors How does a child’s age, sex, race and ethnicity influence his/her diet-related cognitive, behavioural and health outcomes related to food products promoted by popular brand mascots and cartoon media characters? How does a child’s obesity status (e.g. healthy weight versus overweight or obese) influence his/her preference for and response to foods that are branded with popular mascots or cartoon media characters?

Mediating factors How does a child’s cognitive development stage influence his/her preference for certain brand mascots and media characters? Are there any measurable differences in how children respond to brand mascots versus cartoon media characters? How do the design characteristics of mascots or characters (e.g. colour, shape, animation and eye contact with young consumers) appeal to children to promote product awareness, character and product association, character recognition, food or character recall, food preference, purchase request, food choice, food intake and brand loyalty? What are effective auditory cues (e.g. music, jingle and message content) and visual cues (e.g. packaging, labelling, composition and positioning in food-retail outlets and restaurants) used with mascots or media characters to influence children’s food brand recall, product or brand association, food preferences and choices? How do children interpret promotional messages in a food-retail setting when they see certain media characters (e.g. Sesame Workshop’s Elmo promoting apples in the produce aisle) promote messages about a healthy diet and other characters (e.g. Walt Disney Company’s Miss Piggy endorsing Chocolate Honey Nut Cheerios in the RTE cereal aisle) promote foods that do not support a healthy diet? What are appealing and effective auditory or visual messages that can accompany mascots and characters viewed by children to increase their preference, selection and intake of healthy foods? Under what circumstances could mascot or character branding have a long-term influence to improve children’s diet quality to reduce their obesity risk? What actions can parents take to encourage the use of mascots and media characters to promote healthy dietary choices (e.g. fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products and water) and healthy food environments for their children?

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 121

claim that certain mascots (e.g. PepsiCo’s Chester Cheetah, Mars, Inc.’s M&M characters and Coca Cola’s Polar Bears) target children. However, food and beverage com- panies have claimed these mascots are intended only to target adults. There is no empirical evidence to support either position. But evidence suggests that brand mascots are used to build an emotional relationship to cultivate brand loyalty for products that persist into adulthood (41–44).

Future research should test the appeal of a broader and more diverse selection of cartoon brand mascots and media characters to influence a continuum of children’s diet- related outcomes.

Children’s associative learning and dietary outcomes

Experimental research on the psychology of marketing emphasizes that children’s implicit learning and memory of branded products require previous and new exposures to influence their food choices (13,14,16,104). Empirical research shows that children’s associative learning can influence their palate preferences and choices (105). Enthu- siasm for using cartoon media characters, along with children’s repeated exposure to and associative condition- ing to increase vegetable preferences and consumption (106), should be tempered by the reality of food companies and marketers continuing to cultivate children’s association of mascot and media character images with memorable auditory slogans, jingles, taglines, musical themes and stories to promote primarily unhealthy foods. Therefore, future research is needed to strengthen policies that support children’s healthy food preference learning through their early formative years.

Disentangling the influence of several mediating factors

Only two of the 11 studies (88,91) examined several factors concurrently, but were unable to identify the most influen- tial mediating factors (e.g. visual animation, auditory messages, special effects, bright colours, familiarity, receiv- ing a premium with food products and food package attractiveness) to facilitate children’s attention, character recognition, trust, brand association, character and product preferences that link to their diet-related behav- ioural and health outcomes. Future research should examine the appeal and effectiveness of auditory and visual cues and messages conveyed by mascots and characters to children. This research will require interdisciplinary col- laboration among experts in business, food marketing, child psychology, consumer behaviour and public health nutrition.

Food-retail settings

Supermarket aisles and other retail settings are a ‘visual collage of competing brands, multi-colored shapes, spokes- characters, and incentives to influence children’s food choices’ (107).

Product placement on grocery store shelves and even the angle of a mascot’s eye contact with children may influence their brand awareness and preference while shopping (108). Future research is needed to understand how a child interprets promotional messages in a food-retail setting when he or she sees Sesame Workshop’s characters, includ- ing Elmo, Bert and Ernie, promote apples in the produce aisle while The Walt Disney’s Miss Piggy character endorses Chocolate Honey Nut Cheerios in the cereal aisle.

Eye-tracking technology is a novel way that some researchers are using to assess children’s attention to media characters and advertising messages. A recent study did not find a significant association between older children’s expo- sure to cartoon characters in advertisements and their choice of unhealthy food and beverage products at McDon- ald’s Corporation (109). A second study of preschoolers’ exposure to foods with collectible toys found that the toys influenced children’s preferences for both healthy and unhealthy foods, suggesting that a healthy meal paired with a collectible toy might be more preferable than an unhealthy meal without a toy (110).

A third study involving toddlers under 2 years of age found that familiar media characters can convey personal- ized messages to promote early learning experiences com- pared with non-personalized messages or no characters (111). Future research is needed to understand the shop- ping and eating experiences of children in food-retail and restaurant settings.

Evaluations are also needed to assess the effectiveness of communicating visual and auditory messages used to influ- ence children’s diet-related outcomes, especially purchase influence, dietary intake and health. One study that used cartoon characters in comics (print media) suggested that they could be used to build racially and ethnically diverse children’s self-efficacy to encourage fruit consumption (112). It is unclear how culturally diverse children process conflicting messages when they see media characters pro- moting both unhealthy and healthy foods integrated across print, broadcast and digital media.

Conclusions

Brand mascots and cartoon media characters represent a broad range of human or fictional anthropomorphic beings or animated objects used by food, restaurant and entertain- ment companies to sell food products to children. The experimental studies reviewed suggest that cartoon media character branding can positively increase children’s fruit

122 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

or vegetable intake compared with no character branding use. However, familiar media character branding appears to be a more powerful influence on children’s preferences, choices and intake of less healthy foods compared with fruits or vegetables. Future research should use a theory- grounded conceptual model, and larger and more racially and ethnically diverse samples of children in various marketplace settings to produce stronger findings for influ- ential mediating and moderating factors. Finally, future research can be used to inform the deliberations of policymakers, practitioners and advocates at national, regional and global levels regarding how cartoon brand mascots and media characters should be used to create healthy food environments to reduce children’s risk of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases.

Acknowledgments

This paper was adapted from an earlier version commis- sioned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through its Healthy Eating Research program that focused on the United States (U.S.). We thank Mikaela Robertson who provide research support; Jennifer Eder, Elena Serrano, Jerome Williams and Margo Wootan and for comments provided on an earlier draft of this paper; and Juan Quirarte for designing Figures 1 and 2.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest was declared.

References

1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014; 384: 766–781. 2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Obesity update. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf (accessed September 2014). 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Childhood overweight and obesity. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.who.int/ dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/ (accessed October 2014). 4. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. J Am Med Assoc 2014; 311: 806–814. 5. World Health Organization (WHO). Set of Recommendations on the Marketing of Foods and Non-Alcoholic Beverages to Chil- dren. WHO: Geneva, 2010. 6. Hastings G, Stead M, McDermott L et al. Review of research on the effects of food promotion to children. Prepared for the Food Standards Agency. Glasgow: Centre for Social Marketing. 2003. 7. Hastings G, McDermott L, Angus K, Stead M, Thomson S. The extent, nature and effects of food promotion to children: a review of the evidence. Technical paper prepared for the World Health Organization. Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling

& The Open University, United Kingdom. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2006. [WWW document]. URL http://www.who .int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/Hastings_paper_marketing .pdf (accessed October 2014). 8. McGinnis JM, Gootman JA, Kraak VI, Committee on Food Marketing and the Diets of Children and Youth, Institute of Medi- cine (eds). Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity? The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2006. 9. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G. The Extent, Nature and Effects of Food Promotion to Children:A Review of the Evidence to December 2008. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2009. [WWW document]. URL http://www.who.int/ dietphysicalactivity/Evidence_Update_2009.pdf (accessed Septem- ber 2014). 10. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G, Caraher M. Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary. Appetite 2013; 62: 209–215. 11. Bollars C, Boyland E, Breda J et al. Marketing of Foods High in Fat, Salt and Sugar to Children: Update 2012–2013. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013. 12. Mennella JA. Ontogeny of taste preferences: basic biology and implications for health. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 99: 704S– 711S. 13. Ueda P, Tong L, Viedma C et al. Food marketing towards children: brand logo recognition, food-related behavior and BMI among 3–13-year-olds in a south Indian town. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e47000. 14. Arredondo E, Castaneda D, Elder JP, Slymen D, Dozier D. Brand name logo recognition of fast food and healthy food among children. J Community Health 2009; 34: 73–78. 15. Cornwell TB, McAlister AR. Alternative thinking about start- ing points of obesity. Development of child taste preferences. Appetite 2011; 56: 428–439. 16. Cornwell TB, McAlister AR, Polmear-Swendris N. Children’s knowledge of packaged and fast food brands and their BMI: why the relationship matters for policy makers. Appetite 2014; 81: 277–283. 17. White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity. Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation: White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President. 2010. [WWW document]. URL http://www.letsmove.gov/sites/ letsmove.gov/files/TaskForce_on_Childhood_Obesity_May2010 _FullReport.pdf (accessed September 2014). 18. Gosliner W, Madsen KA. Marketing foods and beverages: why licensed commercial characters should not be used to sell healthy products to children. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 1255–1256; author reply. 19. Kraak VI, Story M. An accountability evaluation for indu- stry’s use of brand mascots and licensed characters to market a healthy diet to American children. (submitted). 20. Kraak VI, Harrigan P, Lawrence M, Harrison P, Jackson M, Swinburn B. Balancing the benefits and risks of public-private partnerships to address the global double burden of malnutrition. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 503–517. 21. PriceWater Cooper. Global entertainment and media outlook 2014–2018. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.pwc.com/ gx/en/global-entertainment-media-outlook/index.jhtml (accessed October 2014). 22. The Walt Disney Company. Company overview. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/about -disney/company-overview (accessed October 2014).

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 123

23. Sesame Workshop. Where we work. 2014. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://www.sesameworkshop.org/where-we-work/all- locations/ (accessed October 2014). 24. Viacom. Viacom brands. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.viacom.com/brands/pages/default.aspx (accessed October 2014). 25. Kelly B, Hattersley L, King L, Flood V. Persuasive food mar- keting to children: use of cartoons and competitions in Australian commercial television advertisements. Health Promot Int 2008; 23: 337–344. 26. Hebden L, King L, Kelly B, Chapman K, Innes-Hughes C. A menagerie of promotional characters: promoting food to children through food packaging. J Nutr Educ Behav 2011; 43: 349– 355. 27. Rusak G. Emerging markets, licensing show, emerging IPs. Kidscreen 2013; May/June: 52–56. 28. Chacon V, Letona P, Barnoya J. Child-oriented marketing techniques in snack food packages in Guatemala. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 967–972. 29. Devi A, Eyles H, Rayner M et al. Nutritional quality, labelling and promotion of breakfast cereals on the New Zealand market. Appetite 2014; 81: 253–260. 30. Huang WS, Hsieh T, Chen HS. The advertisement effective- ness of animated spokes-characters. Afr J Bus Manage 2011; 5: 9971–9978. 31. Which?. The cartoon villains are still getting away with it. Children’s food campaign, which? London, United Kingdom, 2008. [WWW document]. URL http://www.foodnavigator .com/Financial-Industry/Round-two-in-Which-versus-the-cartoon- villains (accessed October 2014). 32. Boyland EJ, Harrold JA, Kirkham TC, Halford JC. Persuasive techniques used in television advertisements to market foods to UK children. Appetite 2012, 58: 658–664. 33. Wootan MG, Batada A, Balkus O. Food Marketing Report Card: An Analysis of Food and Entertainment Company Policies to Self-Regulate Food and Beverage Marketing to Chil- dren. Center for Science in the Public Interest: Washington, DC, 2010. 34. Page R, Montgomery K, Ponder A, Richard A. Targeting children in the cereal aisle: promotional techniques and content features on ready-to-eat cereal product packaging. Am J Health Educ 2008; 39: 272–282. 35. Harris JL, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. Marketing foods to children and adolescents: licensed characters and other promotions on packaged foods in the supermarket. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 409–417. 36. Grigsby-Toussaint DS, Rooney MR. Food marketing targeting youth and families: what do we know about stores where moms actually shop? J Environ Public Health 2013; 1–8. 37. Castonguay J, Kunkel D, Wright P, Duff C. Healthy charac- ters? An investigation of marketing practices in children’s food advertising. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013; 45: 571–577. 38. World Health Assembly. Marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Resolution of the Sixty-third World Health Assembly. 21 May 2010. [WWW document]. URL http://apps .who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_R14-en.pdf (accessed October 2014). 39. World Health Organization. A Framework for Implementing the Set of Recommendations on the Marketing of Foods and Non-Alcoholic Beverages to Children. World Health Organiza- tion: Geneva, 2012. 40. World Health Organization. Follow-up to the Political Decla- ration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. 27 May

2013. [WWW document]. URL http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/ pdf_files/WHA66/A66_R10-en.pdf (accessed October 2014). 41. Connell PM, Brucks M, Nielsen JH. How childhood advertis- ing exposure can create biased product evaluation that persist into adulthood. J Consumer Res 2014; 41: 119–134. 42. Chang EC. Influences of the spokes-character on brand equity antecedents. Asia Pac J Market Logist 2014; 26: 494–515. 43. Garretson JA, Niedrich RW. Spokes-characters: creating character trust and positive brand attitudes. J Advert 2004; 33: 25–36. 44. Garretson JA, Burton S. The role of spokescharacters as adver- tisement and package cues in integrated marketing communica- tions. J Mark 2005; 69: 118–132. 45. Mintel Group Ltd. Marketing to kids – US. 2012. [WWW document]. URL http://oxygen.mintel.com/display/590714/ (accessed October 2014). 46. Leibovitz J, Rosch JT, Ramirez E, Brill J, Ohlhausen M. A Review of Food Marketing to Children and Adolescents: Follow-Up Report. Federal Trade Commission.: Washington, DC, 2012. 47. Mintel Group Ltd. Character merchandising – US. 2011. [WWW document]. URL http://store.mintel.com/character- merchandising-us-december-2011 (accessed October 2014). 48. Patel PJ. A question of character – best practice in managing mascots. World Trademark Review June/July 2012. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/Issues/ Article.ashx?g=4179bcc4-5bcc-4186-ad13-ccfce72aa0f3 (accessed October 2014). 49. Brown S. Where the wild brands are: some thoughts on anthropomorphic marketing. Market Rev 2010; 10: 209–224. 50. Phillips BJ. Advertising and the cultural meaning of animals. Adv Consum Res 1996; 23: 354–360. 51. Phillips BJ. Defining trade characters and their role in Ameri- can popular culture. J Pop Cult 1996; 29: 143–158. 52. Callcott MF, Lee WN. Establishing the spokes-character in academic inquiry: historical overview and framework for defini- tion. Adv Consum Res 1995; 22: 144–151. 53. Hollis T. Part of a Complete Breakfast: Cereal Characters of the Baby Boom Era. University of Gainesville Press: Gainesville, FL, 2012. 54. Gitlin M, Topher E. The Great American Cereal Book: How Breakfast Got Its Crunch. Harry N. Abrams: New York, 2012. 55. Dotz W, Husain M. Ad Boy. Ten Speed Press: Berkeley, CA, 2009. 56. Kyung H, Kwon O, Sung Y. The effects of spokes-characters’ personalities of food products on source credibility. J Food Prod Market 2011; 17: 65–78. 57. Ruocco M. Mascot makeovers: good or bad? Cartoon Brew July 20, 2013. [WWW document]. URL http://www.cartoonbrew .com/advertising/mascot-makeovers-good-or-bad-85405.html (accessed October 2014). 58. Campbell’s Soup Company. Our brands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.campbellsoupcompany.com/campbell-brands/ (accessed October 2014). 59. ConAgra Foods, Inc. Food you love. Brands you trust. [WWW document]. URL http://www.conagrafoods.com/our-food/brands (accessed October 2014). 60. The Dannon Food Company, Inc. Our products. [WWW document]. URL http://www.dannon.com/category/our-products/ (accessed October 2014). 61. Ferrero USA, Inc. Products. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.ferrerousa.com/ (accessed October 2014). 62. General Mills, Inc. Brands. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.generalmills.com/Brands.aspx (accessed October 2014).

124 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews

63. The Hershey Company. Our brands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.thehersheycompany.com/brands.aspx (accessed October 2014). 64. Kellogg Company. Our brand portfolio. [WWW document]. URL http://www.kelloggcompany.com/en_US/brandportfolio.html (accessed October 2014). 65. Kraft Foods Group, Inc. Our brands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.kraftfoodsgroup.com/Brands/index.aspx (accessed October 2014). 66. Mars, Inc. Our brands. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.mars.com/global/brands/chocolate.aspx (accessed October 2014). 67. Mondelēz Global LLC. Products and brands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.foodservice-snacks-desserts.com/ ProductsandBrands/ProductMain.aspx (accessed October 2014). 68. Nestlé USA. Good food, good life. Drinks. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://www.nestleusa.com/brands/drinks (accessed October 2014). 69. PepsiCo Inc. Brands you love. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.pepsico.com/Brands.html (accessed October 2014). 70. Post Foods, LLC. Meet the post cereal family. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://www.postfoods.com/our-brands/ (accessed October 2014). 71. The Coca-Cola Company. Brands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.coca-colacompany.com/brands/the-coca-cola- company/ (accessed October 2014). 72. McDonald’s USA, LLC. Happy meals. [WWW document]. URL http://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en/food/meal_bundles/happy _meals.html (accessed October 2014). 73. Council of the Better Business Bureaus. Children’s food and beverage advertising initiative. September 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bbb.org/council/the-national-partner -program/national-advertising-review-services/childrens-food-and -beverage-advertising-initiative/ (accessed October 2014). 74. DreamWorks Animation SKG. Characters. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://www.dreamworksanimation.com (accessed October 2014). 75. Viacom, Nickelodeon. Games, episodes, shows and charac- ters. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nick.com/ (accessed October 2014). 76. Sesame Workshop. Workshop at a glance. [WWW document]. URL http://www.sesameworkshop.org/about-us/workshop-at-a- glance/ (accessed October 2014). 77. The Walt Disney Company. Our businesses. [WWW docu- ment]. URL http://thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-companies (accessed October 2014). 78. Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. Company Overview. [WWW document]. URL http://www.warnerbros.com/studio/ about/company-overview (accessed October 2014). 79. The United States Patent and Trademark Office. Trademark, copyright or patent? 2010. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trade_defin.jsp (accessed October 2014). 80. US Copyright Office. Fair use. Washington, DC. June 2012. [WWW document]. URL http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html (accessed October 2014). 81. Richert RA, Robb MB, Smith EI. Media as social partners: the social nature of young children’s learning from screen media. Child Dev 2011; 82: 82–95. 82. Bond BJ, Calvert SL. A model and measure of U.S. parents’ perceptions of young children’s parasocial relationships. J Child Media 2014; 8: 286–304. 83. Hémar-Nicolas V, Gollety M. Using brand character when targeting children: what for? An exploration of managers’ and

children’s viewpoints. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers 2012; 13: 20–29. 84. Macklin MC. Pre-schooler learning of brand names from visual cues. J Consumer Res 1996; 23: 251–261. 85. Hoeffner C. Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. J Broadcast Elec- tron Media 1996; 40: 389–402. 86. de Droog SM, Valkenburg PM, Buijzen M. Using brand char- acters to promote young children’s liking of and purchase requests for fruit. J Health Commun 2011; 16: 79–89. 87. de Droog SM, Buijzen M, Valkenburg PM. Use a rabbit or a rhino to sell a carrot? The effect of character–product congruence on children’s liking of healthy foods. J Health Commun 2012; 17: 1068–1080. 88. Keller KL, Kuilema LG, Lee N et al. The impact of food branding on children’s eating behavior and obesity. Physiol Behav 2012; 106: 379–386. 89. Kotler JA, Schiffman JM, Hanson KG. The influence of media characters on children’s food choices. J Health Commun 2012; 17: 886–898. 90. Lapierre MA, Vaala SE, Linebarger DL. Influence of licensed spokescharacters and health cues on children’s ratings of cereal taste. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165: 229–234. 91. Neeley SM, Schumann DW. Using animated spokes-characters in advertising to young children. J Advert 2004; 33: 7–23. 92. Roberto CA, Baik J, Harris JL, Brownell KD. Influence of licensed characters on children’s taste and snack preferences. Pedi- atrics 2010; 126: 88–93. 93. Ülger B. Packages with cartoon trade characters versus adver- tising: an empirical examination of preschoolers’ food preferences. Journal of Food Products Marketing 2009; 15: 104–117. 94. Smits T, Vandebosch H. Endorsing children’s appetite for healthy foods: celebrity versus non-celebrity spokes-characters. Communication 2012; 37: 371–391. 95. Letona P, Chacon V, Roberto C, Barnoya J. Effects of licensed characters on children’s taste and snack preferences in Guatemala, a low/middle income country. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 38: 1466– 1469. 96. Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR. Can branding improve school lunches? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166: 967–968. 97. Lavidge RJ, Steiner GA. A model for predictive measurements of advertising effectiveness. J Marketing 1961; 25: 59–62. URL 98. Barry TE, Howard DJ. A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. Int J Advert 1990; 9: 121–131. 99. Irwin DA Selling a healthy campaign: the influence of trade characters on children’s food choice. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Arkansas, December 2008. URL http:// gradworks.umi.com/14/61/1461470.html (accessed September 2014). 100. Sesame Workshop. Beloved Sesame Street characters to promote fresh fruit and vegetable consumption to kids. October 30, 2013 [press release]. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.sesameworkshop.org/press-releases/beloved-sesame-street- characters-promote-fresh-fruit-vegetable-consumption-kids/ (accessed October 2014). 101. Evich HB. How the produce industry got Elmo. Politico November 4, 2013. [WWW document]. URL http://www.politico .com/story/2013/11/michelle-obama-sesame-street-obesity-99328 .html#.UnmGnZMwIvs.twitter (accessed October 2014). 102. Karst T. Cookie Monster helps kids, families ‘eat brighter!’. The Packer March 30, 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www .thepacker.com/fruit-vegetable-news/fresh-produce-retail/Cookie -Monster-helps-kids-families-eat-brighter-253109451.html ?view=all (accessed October 2014).

obesity reviews Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story 125

103. Harris JL, Brownell KD, Bargh JA. The food marketing defense model: integrating psychological research to protect youth and inform public policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev 2009; 3: 211– 271. 104. Auty S, Lewis C. Exploring children’s choice: the reminder effect of product placement. Psychol Market 2004; 21: 697–713. 105. Cornwell TB, McAlister AR. Contingent choice. Exploring the relationship between sweetened beverages and vegetable con- sumption. Appetite 2013; 62: 203–208. 106. Keller KL. The use of repeated exposure and associative conditioning to increase vegetable acceptance in children: explain- ing the variability across studies. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114: 1169–1173. 107. Berry B, McMullen T. Visual communication to children in the supermarket context: health protective or exploitive? Agric Human Values 2008; 25: 333–348.

108. Musicus A, Tal A, Wansink B. Eyes in the aisles: why is Cap’n Crunch looking down at my child? Environ Behav 2014; 1–19. 109. Velazquez CE, Pasch KE. Attention to food and beverage advertisements as measured by eye-tracking technology and the food preferences and choices of youth. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114: 578–582. 110. McAlister AR, Cornwell TB. Collectible toys as marketing tools: understanding preschool children’s responses to foods paired with premiums. J Public Policy Market 2012; 31: 195–205. 111. Calvert SL, Richards MN, Kent CC. Personalized interactive characters for toddlers’ learning of seriation from a video presen- tation. J Appl Dev Psychol 2014; 35: 148–155. 112. Leung MM, Tripicchio G, Agaronov A, Hou N. Manga comic influences snack selection in black and Hispanic New York City youth. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014; 46: 142–147.

126 Influence of characters on children’s diet V. I. Kraak & M. Story obesity reviews