logs assignment two deliverable s and 3 pages

FMJH Project Grading Rubric

Objective/ Criteria

Needed Improvement

Met Expectations

Developing

Exceptional

Did Not Meet Expectations

Reflection Paper: Overall Self Reflection &

Introspection

Student did not report that any of the activities had meaning or relevance to their life. (5 points)

Student identified only one activity and stated why this activity was helpful. (10 points)

Student was able to identify two or more activities that were beneficial to them and state why these were helpful. No explicit discussion related to holistic theory was offered. (15 points)

Student is able to identify two or more activities that were beneficial to them and state why these were helpful. Student showed evidence of understanding the holistic theory and concepts that undergird the activities. This can be showing areas for growth, showing a healthy habit or confirming a previous change. BE SPECIFIC!

(20 Points)

Did not meet expectations.

(0 points)

Reflection Paper: Relating concepts to life as a student or professional employee & in relationship to others

Student did not directly reference how these activities might influence their academic or professional life. (2 points)

Student showed awareness of how one of these activities might influence their academic or professional life. (5 points)

Student showed awareness of how several of these activities from the project might influence their success as a student, employee, and in current or future relationships with others.

(8 points)

Student drew relevant connections between the practice of certain holistic coping strategies and their success as a student and employee. The exceptional paper more than states this connection, relaying why these activities might support success in their personal and professional life. (10 points)

Did not meet expectations.

(0 points)

Reflection Paper: Development of a Behavior Change Plan

The plan is vague or otherwise confusing and several of the conditions for change were missing. (20 points)

Student identified a plan; however, two or more of the conditions for change are missing. (30 points)

Student identified a plan for change; however, the plan is not fully developed. One or more of the conditions for change are missing. (40 points)

Student stated what their plan for change would be and described how they might go about implementing this plan; sets goals to support the desired change. Plan is doable, modest, has goals, a timeline, and support mechanisms are acknowledged. Meets all the markers outlined in Chapter 1!

(50 point)

Did not meet expectations.

(0 points)

Structure

Student had multiple errors of grammar, spelling, structure, or format. Paper was difficult to understand, and overall points were lost to the reader. (5 points)

Paper had few grammatical, spelling, structural, or formatting errors. (10 points)

Paper had minimal grammatical, spelling, structural, or format errors. Paper had an introduction and conclusion.

(15 points)

Paper has minimal or no grammatical errors, spelling or format errors. There is flow between paragraphs, and paragraphs have a clear thesis followed by support. The paper has a clear introduction, thesis and summary.

(20 points)

Did not meet expectations.

(0 points)