Kaizen
Johnnetwork 
FMEAtableExam1.xlsxSheet1
| Process or Product Name: | Prepared by: | Page | of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Responsible: | FMEA Date (Orig): | (Rev): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Process Step | Key Process Input | Failure Modes - What can go wrong? | Effects | SEV Nancy Lunsford: How Severe is the effect to the customer? 10 = Hazardous without warning 9 = Hazardous with warning 8 = Loss of primary function 7 = Reduced primary function performance 6 = Loss of secondary function 5 = Reduced secondary function performance 4 = Minor defect noticed by most customers 3 = Minor defect noticed by some customers 2 = Minor defect noticed by discriminating customers 1 = No effect | Causes | OCC Nancy Lunsford: How often does cause or FM occur? 9 - 10 = Very high: Failure is almost inevitable 7 - 8 = High: Repeated failures 4 - 6 = Moderate: Occasional failures 2 - 3 = Low: Relatively few failures 1 = Remote: Failure is unlikely | Current Controls | DET Nancy Lunsford: How well can you detect cause or FM? 10 = Can not detect 9 = Very remote chance of detection 8 = Remote chance of detection 7 = Very low chance of detection 6 = Low chance of detection 5 = Moderate chance of detection 4 = Moderately high chance of detection 3 = High chance of detection 2 = Very high chance of detection 1 = Almost certain detection | RPN | Actions Recommended Nancy Lunsford: What are the actions for reducing the occurrence of the Cause, or improving detection? Should have actions only on high RPN's or easy fixes. | Resp. Nancy Lunsford: Who Is Responsible for the recommended action? | Actions Taken Nancy Lunsford: What are the completed actions taken with the recalculated RPN? Be sure to include completion month/year |
Nancy Lunsford: How Severe is the effect to the customer? 10 = Hazardous without warning 9 = Hazardous with warning 8 = Loss of primary function 7 = Reduced primary function performance 6 = Loss of secondary function 5 = Reduced secondary function performance 4 = Minor defect noticed by most customers 3 = Minor defect noticed by some customers 2 = Minor defect noticed by discriminating customers 1 = No effect |
Nancy Lunsford: How often does cause or FM occur? 9 - 10 = Very high: Failure is almost inevitable 7 - 8 = High: Repeated failures 4 - 6 = Moderate: Occasional failures 2 - 3 = Low: Relatively few failures 1 = Remote: Failure is unlikely |
Nancy Lunsford: How well can you detect cause or FM? 10 = Can not detect 9 = Very remote chance of detection 8 = Remote chance of detection 7 = Very low chance of detection 6 = Low chance of detection 5 = Moderate chance of detection 4 = Moderately high chance of detection 3 = High chance of detection 2 = Very high chance of detection 1 = Almost certain detection |
Nancy Lunsford: What are the actions for reducing the occurrence of the Cause, or improving detection? Should have actions only on high RPN's or easy fixes. |
Nancy Lunsford: Who Is Responsible for the recommended action? | SEV | OCC | DET | RPN | Step/Input | ||||
