|
Hi Funmi,
Please review video feedback and attached documents with detailed feedback.
Best regards,
Dr. Linda
Learning Objective LO 1.1: Create alignment between the goals of the community center and the goals of the PPACA, HP2020 and IOM.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Executive summary clearly and accurately explains how the goals of the Center for Diabetes Care align with the goals of the PPACA Community Health Center Fund, Healthy People 2020, and IOM aims for quality care.
Response references relevant academic/professional resources.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective LO 1.2: Explanation ofstakeholder perspectives that support business recommendations.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Executive summary clearly explains internal and external stakeholder perspectives that support the business recommendation presented in the case.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective1.3: Explain how the business recommendation fits within the continuum of care.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Executive summary is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete in explaining how the recommendation presented in the case fits within the continuum of care of the healthcare organization presented in the case.
|
|
Additional Comments:see detailed feedback attached
|
Learning Objective 2.1: Create vision and mission statements.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Vision and mission statements reflect accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 2.2: Create a value statement.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Value statement aligns with accrediting bodies’ benchmarks for quality healthcare.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 2.3: Conduct a SWOT analysis.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
SWOT analysis does not include at least four of the greatest strengths, four of the greatest weaknesses, four of the greatest opportunities, and four of the greatest threats for the development of the initiative recommended in the case presented.
Content of the SWOT analysis is vague, inaccurate, or not concise.
Analysis does not take into consideration the information and perspectives from all documentation provided with the case.
|
|
Additional Comments:need at least two more weaknesses and two more threats
|
Learning Objective 2.4: Develop strategies for launching and operationalizing a healthcare initiative.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Response clearly and concisely describes at least four strategies for launching and operationalizing the initiative recommended in the case presented.
Strategies align with the results of the SWOT analysis.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 2.5: Develop goals for a healthcare initiative.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response describes fewer than four short-term goals and/or fewer than four measurable long-term goals for the initiative recommended in the case presented, and/or the goals are not measurable, and/or they do not align with the mission, vision, and values statements.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Learning Objective3.1: Develop a timeline for implementing key activities.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Timeline identifies responsible parties for each item.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 3.2: Analyze financial data.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Analysis of the expected patient-generated revenue, grant funding, non-staff costs, staffing costs, and capital costs for the initiative presented in the case.
Chart summarizing the financial data is confusing, vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Learning Objective 4.1: Defend how the recommended healthcare initiative addresses unmet needs.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Defense of the recommended initiative does not address unmet needs, or the defense is weak or vague, or is not relevant to the initiative in the case presented.
Explanation does not reference relevant information provided in the needs-assessment documentation presented in the case.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Learning Objective 4.2: Explain how a healthcare initiative can help promote positive social change.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
The presentation explains how the healthcare initiative supports both short and long term positive social change.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 4.3: Create a culturally competent healthcare initiative.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Response demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2,” plus the following:
Explanation includes qualitative and quantitative data that underscore the importance of cultural competency with the patient population.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective 4.4: Explain how a healthcare initiative can become financially self-sustaining.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Explanation of how the healthcare initiative in the case presented can become financially self-sustaining within three years of opening is vague, inaccurate, or incomplete.
|
|
Additional Comments:Great organization and use of visuals. However, the conclusions are not accurate for the facts of the case scenario. Many revenue assumptions need to be reviewed and revised.
|
Learning Objective 4.5: Explain how the success of a healthcare initiative can be measured.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Explanation of how the success of the healthcare initiative in the case presented can be measured is vague or both qualitative and quantitative methods are not explained.
Methods of measurement are not appropriate for the initiative in the case presented.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Oral Communication PS 2.1: Use clear enunciation, correct pronunciation, comfortable pacing, and appropriate volume.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Presenter enhances audience engagement through consistently clear enunciation, correct pronunciation, comfortable pacing, and appropriate volume.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Oral Communication PS 2.2: Organize information to be presented.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Organization of information significantly enhances audience understanding of both general and specific concepts, and promotes audience engagement.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Technology PS 3.1: Use images and layout of presentations to effectively communicate content to a specific audience.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Images and design elements are used purposefully, and they effectively support audience engagement and understanding of key concepts.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Learning Objective LO 5.1: Identify business risks.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response identifies fewer than three business risks that could prevent the healthcare organization in the case presented from meeting its financial goals within three years, or the risks are not realistic, or response if vague.
|
|
Additional Comments:Risks need to include specific references to the facts of the case in addition to the broader "academic" perspective
|
Learning Objective LO 5.2: Develop strategies to manage business risks.:
|
NOT PRESENT
|
|
0
|
The strategies to manage business risks are missing.
|
|
Additional Comments:See feedback. The conclusion did not present any strategies in specific terms for the organization. This just needs to be revised to incorporate what you want to say to Dr. Novak
|
Written Communication Objective PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
Writing is consistently well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are used effectively to enhance clarity, cohesion, and flow.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.:
|
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
3
|
APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied correctly and consistently throughout the paper. Sources are consistently cited appropriately and accurately.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Written Communication PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.:
|
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
|
|
2
|
Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.
|
|
Additional Comments:
|
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument.
Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.
|
|
Additional Comments:This will be resolved once edits are made throughout your work to reflect specific and accurate realities of the case scenario
|
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.:
|
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
|
|
1
|
Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem.
|
|
Additional Comments: see detailed feedback attached
|
|
cutie123221
FM010FeedbackOriginal.docx
0
